Investigating the ease-of-retrieval effect in an eyewitness context

References

• Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90016-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. (2019, September 25). Judge allows eyewitness IDs based on altered photo with bank robbery suspect’s facial tattoos removed. Oregon Live. https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2019/09/judge-allows-eyewitness-ids-of-bank-robbery-suspect-based-on-altered-photo-with-mans-facial-neck-tattoos-removed.html
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, M., Beaudry, J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2007). Belief of eyewitness identification evidence. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 2. Memory for people (pp. 501–525). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bradfield, A. L., Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2002). The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N. (2006). Uses and abuses of eyewitness identification confidence. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X79672
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.1.44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence–accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410389169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busey, T. A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. G. B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2014). Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control: Has the evidence for ego depletion been overestimated? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Gervais, W. M., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
   Google Scholar
• Charman, S. D., Carlucci, M., Vallano, J., & Gregory, A. H. (2010). The selective cue integration framework: A theory of postidentification witness confidence assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(6), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., Macrae, C. N., & Haddock, G. (1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L. B., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L. F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., … Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data-collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic
   Google Scholar
• Faul, E., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behavioural Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C., & Heene, M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, S. G., & Walters, H. A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H. (2007). Relying on accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity. Social Cognition, 25(6), 853–881. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely affective and cognitive feelings in judgement? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310367640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, G. (2002). It’s easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favourability of attitude judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments or attitude certainty, intensity, and important: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horry, R., & Brewer, N. (2016). How target-lure similarity shapes confidence judgments in multiple-alternative decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1615–1634. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocence Project. (2020). http://www.innocenceproject.org/causes-wrongful-conviction/eyewitness-misidentification
   Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.10.0) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Juslin, P., Olsson, N., & Winman, A. (1996). Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1304–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnen, U. (2010). Manipulation checks as manipulation: Another look at the ease-of-retrieval heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D., Briggs, M. A., & Bowman, R. E. (1991). Need for cognition and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Eisenstadt, D. (2007). Eyewitness confidence and the confidence-accuracy relationship in memory for people. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 377–425). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Neil v. Biggers. (1972). 409 U.S. 188.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. (2013). Easy to retrieve but hard to believe: Metacognitive discounting of the unpleasantly possible. Psychological Science, 24(6), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612461359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2010). Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., Weber, N., & Nagesh, A. (2013). The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics. (2019). Qualtrics (Version July, 2019) [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder, M., & Bless, H. (2003). Mood and the reliance on the ease of retrieval heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraiva, R. B., Hope, H., Horselenberg, R., Ost, J., Sauer, J. D., & van Koppen, P. J. (2020). Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Memory (Hove, England), 28(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J. D., & Brewer, N. (2015). Confidence and accuracy of eyewitness identification. In T. Valentine, & J. Davis (Eds.), Forensic facial identification: Theory and practice of identification for eyewitnesses, composites and CCTV (pp. 185–208). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, J. D., Brewer, N., Zweck, T., & Weber, N. (2010). The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9192-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J. D., Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2019). Pitfalls in using eyewitness confidence to diagnose the accuracy of an individual identification decision. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(3), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, behaviour, and experience. Memory & Cognition, 39(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0066-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Douglass, A. B. (2011). Jurors believe eyewitnesses. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 185–209). APA Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. J., & Corty, E. (1984). Cognitive heuristics. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Sruli (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 189–286). Eribaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21-word solution. Dialogue: The Official Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588
   Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U. (2014, March 12). No-way interactions. Data Colada. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.142559.90552
   Google Scholar
• Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eye-witness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law & Human Behavior, 21(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024890732059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. M., Wells, G. L., & Douglass, A. L. (2014). The eyewitness post-identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1700–1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 20(5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90129-8
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tybout, A. M., Sternthal, B., Malaviya, P., Bakamitsos, G. A., & Park, S. (2005). Information accessibility as a moderator of judgments: The role of content versus retrieval ease. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/426617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2018). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2017. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cfoi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgements. Psychology and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/209502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease-of-retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologia, 89(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(93)E0072-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarten, E., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2018). Does ease mediate the ease-of-retrieval effect? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(3), 227–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect:” feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C. A., & Wixted, J. T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuensch, K. L. (2009). Placing a confidence interval on multiple R2. http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/StatHelp/CI-R2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2009). Big correlations in little studies: Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power-commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 4(3), 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01127.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yarkoni, T. (2019). The generalizability crisis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jqw35
   Google Scholar