Guess what? Different source-guessing strategies for old versus new information

References

• Arnold, N. R., Bayen, U. J., Kuhlmann, B. G., & Vaterrodt, B. (2013). Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: A test of the probability-matching account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 326–333. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0342-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Batchelder, E. (2008). Metacognitive guessing strategies in source monitoring. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 211–244). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source-item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring: Tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2015). Appearance-based first impressions and person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2017). Emotional memory: No source memory without old–new recognition. Emotion, 17(1), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2020). Source attributions for detected new items: Persistent evidence for schematic guessing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820911004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehm, U., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2018). On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1614–1631. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1054-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chechile, R. A. (2009). Pooling data versus averaging model fits for some prototypical multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(6), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. (2010). How many friends does one person need? Dunbar's number and other evolutionary quirks. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, K., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). Flexible use of source information: Processing components of the inconsistency effect in person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2019). Don't calculate post-hoc power using observed estimate of effect size. Annals of Surgery, 269(1), e9–e10. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. L., & Cockman, D. W. (2003). The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00537-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team (2019). JASP (Version 0.11.1)[Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & D. S. Lindsay (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, R. S. E., Arnold, M. C., Bayen, U. J., McEvoy, J. P., & Wilson, W. H. (2002). Source-monitoring deficits for self-generated stimuli in schizophrenia: Multinomial modeling of data from three sources. Schizophrenia Research, 57(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-9964(01)00306-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., & Meiser, T. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1074–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroneisen, M., & Bell, R. (2013). Sex, cheating, and disgust: Enhanced source memory for trait information that violates gender stereotypes. Memory, 21(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.713971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B. G., & Bayen, U. J. (2016). Metacognitive aspects of source monitoring. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 149–168). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B. G., Bayen, U. J., Meuser, K., & Kornadt, A. E. (2016). The impact of age stereotypes on source monitoring in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B. G., & Touron, D. R. (2011). Older adults' use of metacognitive knowledge in source monitoring: Spared monitoring but impaired control. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, B. G., Vaterrodt, B., & Bayen, U. J. (2012). Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: Support for a probability-matching account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küppers, V., & Bayen, U. J. (2014). Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(10), 2042–2059. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.904914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2014). Observed power, and what to do if your editor asks for post-hoc power analyses [Blog post]. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2014/12/observed-power-and-what-to-do-if-your.html
   Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meiser, T., Sattler, C., & von Hecker, U. (2007). Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: The role of perceived differences in item recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600875215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Z., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaper, M. L., Kuhlmann, B. G., & Bayen, U. J. (2019). Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(3), 470–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaniol, J., & Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer.
   Google Scholar