Updating and pre-existing semantic associations: testing can enhance or impair new learning

References

• Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659–701. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binks, S. (2018). Testing enhances learning: A review of the literature. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Meissner, C. A., & Davis, S. D. (2018). Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(11), 1111–1146. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. D., & Chan, J. C. K. (2015). Studying on borrowed time: How does testing impair new learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6), 1741–1754. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. D., Chan, J. C. K., & Wilford, M. M. (2017). The dark side of interpolated testing: Frequent switching between retrieval and encoding impairs new learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249–275). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenkraemer, R. E., Jaeger, A., & Stein, L. M. (2013). A systematic review of the testing effect in learning. Paidéia, 23(56), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272356201314
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, B. (2017). A framework of episodic updating: An account of memory updating after retrieval. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 67, pp. 173–211). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2013). Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1665–1681. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., Price, J., & Murray, R. (2020). Age differences in item selection behaviors and subsequent memory for new foreign language vocabulary: Evidence for a region of proximal learning heuristic. Psychology and Aging, 35(8), 1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Kelley, C. M. (2015). Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1282–1297. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastötter, B., & Bäuml, K.-H. T. (2014). Retrieval practice enhances new learning: The forward effect of testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00286
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. G. (2018). When to move on to new learning: Metacognition’s effects on updating with incorporation [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
   Google Scholar
• Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N., & Jacoby, L. L. (2013). Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N., Smith, W. G., & Delaney, P. F. (2019). Reminders can enhance or impair episodic memory updating: A memory-for-change perspective. Memory, 27(6), 849–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1582677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar