The effect of video playback speed on learning and mind-wandering in younger and older adults

References

• Arnicane, A., Oberauer, K., & Souza, A. S. (2021). Validity of attention self-reports in younger and older adults. Cognition, 206, 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8) (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, B. M., Vania, Y. Y., & Schneider, B. A. (2012). Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker? Hearing Research, 290(1–2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondé, P., Girardeau, J. C., Sperduti, M., & Piolino, P. (2021). A wandering mind is a forgetful mind: A systematic review on the influence of mind-wandering on episodic memory encoding. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 132, 774–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosowsky, N. P., DeGutis, J., Esterman, M., Smilek, D., & Seli, P. (2020). Mind wandering, motivation, and task performance over time: Evidence that motivation insulates people from the negative effects of mind wandering. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000263
   Google Scholar
• Cerella, J., & Hale, S. (1994). The rise and fall in information-processing rates over the life span. Acta Psychologica, 86(2–3), 109–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90002-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs, A. R., & Rule, B. G. (1989). Adult age differences in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 4(4), 500–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.4.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., Birney, D. P., & Walker, S. A. (2018). A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning. Memory, 26(6), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1404111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulke, E., & Sticht, T. G. (1969). Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin, 72(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., Nara, B., Zavagnin, M., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2015). Validating older adults’ reports of less mind-wandering: An examination of eye movements and dispositional influences. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giambra, L. M. (1989). Task-unrelated thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. L., Cowan, N., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Working memory capacity for spoken sentences decreases with adult ageing: Recall of fewer but not smaller chunks in older adults. Memory, 16(7), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802261124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, G. M. (1970). Listener comprehension of compressed speech as a function of the academic grade level of the subjects. Journal of Communication, 20(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(6), 1276–1285. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2001). Aging and temporal discrimination in auditory sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(6), 2955–2963. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1371760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, M., & Was, C. A. (2022). Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands. Consciousness and Cognition, 103, 103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Powell-Moman, A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Aging and monitoring associative learning: Is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, T. M. (2005). Memory and aging in context. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, R. B., & Was, C. A. (2014). Mind-wandering and online learning: How working memory, interest, and mind-wandering impact learning from videos. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36(36), 3084–3089. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7q14x97s
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, R. B., & Was, C. A. (2016). Mind-wandering, control failures, and social media distractions in online learning. Learning and Instruction, 42, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Shaner, J. L., & Strahm, S. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 49(5), 240–P249. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.5.P240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and Reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A. (2011). Participation in learning and wellbeing among older adults. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2011.570876
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., & Mostafa, T. (2015). The effects of learning on wellbeing for older adults in England. Ageing & Society, 35(10), 2053–2070. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14000762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordão, M., Ferreira-Santos, F., Pinho, M. S., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2019). Meta-analysis of aging effects in mind-wandering: Methodological and sociodemographic factors. Psychology and Aging, 34(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakulla, B. (2021). 2022 tech trends and adults 50-Plus. AARP Research. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00493.001
   Google Scholar
• Konkle, D., Beasley, D., & Bess, F. H. (1977). Intelligibility of time altered speech in relation to chronological aging. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2001.108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krawietz, S. A., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Aging and mind-wandering during text comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, D., Chen, G., Mirzaei, K., & Paepcke, A. (2020). Is faster better?: A study of video playback speed. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375466
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, D. S. Y., & Liu, B. C. P. (2011). Lifelong education, quality of life and self-efficacy of Chinese older adults. Educational Gerontology, 37(11), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2010.492732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, S. I., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillet, D., & Rajah, M. N. (2016). Assessing the neural correlates of task-unrelated thoughts during episodic encoding and their association with subsequent memory in young and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(6), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manheim, M., Lavie, L., & Banai, K. (2018). Age, hearing, and the perceptual learning of rapid speech. Trends in Hearing, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518778651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain, C., Vogels, E. A., Perrin, A., Sechopoulos, S., & Rainie, L. (2021, September 1). The Internet and the pandemic. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/09/01/the-internet-and-the-pandemic/.
   Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., Meier, M. E., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind-wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. H., Hoover, K. M., Agadzhanyan, K., Kuehn, J. C., & Castel, A. D. (2022). Learning in double time: The effect of lecture video speed on immediate and delayed comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagahama, T., & Morita, Y. (2017). Effect analysis of playback speed for lecture video including instructor images. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 11(1), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Narushima, M. (2008). More than nickels and dimes: The health benefits of a community-based lifelong learning program for older adults. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370802408332
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. B., Friedman, H. L., & Williams, J. C. C. (1965). Trainability of listening comprehension of speeded discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1/2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 72(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw066
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, R., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). Using time-compression to make multimedia learning more efficient: Current research and practice. TechTrends, 59(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0841-2
   Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning. In J. Dunlosky, & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, K. M., Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. A. (1993). Passage difficulty, speech rate, and age differences in memory for spoken text: Speech recall and the complexity hypothesis. Experimental Aging Research, 19(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739308253926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind-wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, M. K., Miller, A. L., & Unsworth, N. (2019). Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01212-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710000706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. F., & Moore, J. R. (1989). Natural alteration of speaking rate: The effect on passage comprehension by listeners over 75 years of age. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 32(2), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3202.445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., Murphy, D. R., & See, S. K. (2000). Listening to discourse in distracting settings: The effects of aging. Psychology and Aging, 15(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, A. L., Frischkorn, G. T., & Rummel, J. (2020). The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing. Psychological Research, 84(7), 1846–1856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01194-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., Levene, M., & Smilek, D. (2013). How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(2013), 430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., Wammes, J. D., Risko, E. F., Schacter, D. L., & Smilek, D. (2018). On the clock: Evidence for the rapid and strategic modulation of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli, P., Maillet, D., Smilek, D., Oakman, J. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli, P., O'Neill, K., Carriere, J., Smilek, D., Beaty, R. E., & Schacter, D. L. (2021). Mind-wandering across the age gap: Age-related differences in mind-wandering are partially attributable to age-related differences in motivation. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 76(7), 1264–1271. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli, P., Schacter, D. L., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2019). Increasing participant motivation reduces rates of intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychological Research, 83(5), 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0914-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., Chakraborty, A., Dawson, M., Dugan, A., Adkins, B., & Doty, C. (2018). Does the podcast video playback speed affect comprehension for novel curriculum delivery? A randomized trial. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.10.36027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stine, E. A. L., Wingfield, A., & Myers, S. D. (1990). Age differences in processing information from television news: The effects of bisensory augmentation. Journal of Gerontology, 45(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.1.P1
   Google Scholar
• Stine, E. L., & Wingfield, A. (1987). Process and strategy in memory for speech among younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 2(3), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.3.272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In Cognitive load theory. Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies (vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K. (2017). Directing the wandering mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416670320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K., Khan, N. Y., & Schacter, D. L. (2013a). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind-wandering and improve learning of online lectures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313–6317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221764110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013b). Mind-wandering and education: From the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1589–1625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A., & Mecsas, C. (1992). Rapid speech processing and divided attention: Processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects. Psychology and Aging, 7(4), 546–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2014). Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities. Acta Psychologica, 150, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. E., & Letowski, T. (1997). Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(5), 1192–1200. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4005.1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vemuri, S., DeCamp, P., Bender, W., & Schmandt, C. (2004, April). Improving speech playback using time-compression and speech recognition. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 295–302). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985730
   Google Scholar
• Ward, G., Woodward, G., Stevens, A., & Stinson, C. (2003). Using overt rehearsals to explain word frequency effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiemers, E. A., & Redick, T. S. (2019). The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(1), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1529-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. E., Martin, L., Smilek, D., & Risko, E. F. (2018). The benefits and costs of speed watching video lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000127
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., & Ducharme, J. L. (1999). Effects of age and passage difficulty on listening-rate preferences for time-altered speech. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54(3), P199–P202. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.3.P199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Poon, L. W., Lombardi, L., & Lowe, D. (1985). Speed of processing in normal aging: Effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. Journal of Gerontology, 40(5), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/40.5.579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., Koh, C. K., & Rosen, M. J. (1999). Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging, 14(3), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar