Can synchronised tones facilitate immediate memory for printed lists?

References

• Almutairi, M., & Shukri, N. (2016). Using songs in teaching oral skills to young learners: Teachers’ views and attitudes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(6), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i6.10464
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2014). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 206–226). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., & Camos, V. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blain, S., Talamini, F., Fornoni, L., Bidet-Caulet, A., & Caclin, A. (2022). Shared cognitive resources between memory and attention during sound-sequence encoding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(3), 739–759. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02390-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Cowan, N. (2005). Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: A reconciliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1235–1249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00899.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1984). On short and long auditory stores. Psychological Bulletin, 96(2), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.2.341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etz, A., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Introduction to Bayesian inference for psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1262-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanuel, L., Portrat, S., Dalla Bella, S., Tillmann, B., & Plancher, G. (2020). Do temporal regularities during maintenance benefit short-term memory in the elderly? Inhibition capacities matter. Experimental Aging Research, 46(5), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2020.1776572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanuel, L., Portrat, S., Tillmann, B., & Plancher, G. (2018). Temporal regularities allow saving time for maintenance in working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424, 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreri, L., & Verga, L. (2016). Benefits of music on verbal learning and memory: How and when does it work? Music Perception, 34, 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2016.34.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & McDonald, N. (2001). The intersection between music and early literacy instruction: Listen to literacy! Reading Improvement, 38(Fall), 106–115. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4536d7cedb49523efac40815d05310c3/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=2030479
   Google Scholar
• Glanzer, M., & Schwartz, A. (1971). Mnemonic structure in free recall: Differential effects on STS and LTS. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(2), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80013-0
   Google Scholar
• Guérard, K., Hughes, R. W., & Tremblay, S. (2008). An isolation effect in serial memory for spatial information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(5), 752–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701402331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérard, K., Neath, I., Surprenant, A. M., & Tremblay, S. (2010). Distinctiveness in serial memory for spatial information. Memory & Cognition, 38(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2011). Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1580–1592. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.564636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Chamberland, C., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2016). Perceptual-motor determinants of auditory-verbal serial short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Marsh, J. E., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Perceptual-gestural (mis)mapping in serial short-term memory: The impact of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1411–1425. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Marsh, J. E., & Jones, D. M. (2011). Role of serial order in the impact of talker variability on short-term memory: Testing a perceptual organization-based account. Memory & Cognition, 39(8), 1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0116-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, L. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (1979). Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 1–21). LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T. A., Cowan, N., & Saults, J. S. (1995). Can auditory memory for tone pitch be rehearsed? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. A. (2016). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments (R package Version 4.4-0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ez
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Campbell, T. A., Vachon, F., Taylor, P. J., & Hughes, R. W. (2020). How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(1), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2004). When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
   Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2022). Package 'BayesFactor'. Computer software manual. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/BayesFactor.pdf. Downloaded from the worldwide web 4 July, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, D. J. (2015). Learning statistics with R: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners (Version 0.5). University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/559.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, C. E. (2003). A comparison of Bible verse memorization using traditional techniques versus using song [Doctoral dissertation]. Johnson Bible College. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480896.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Orlova, N. (2003). Helping prospective EFL teachers learn how to use songs in teaching conversation classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Orlova-Songs.html
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F.B.R., & Beaman, C.P. (2015). Contrasting effects of changing rhythm and content on auditory distraction in immediate memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 69(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretz, I., & Coltheart, M. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peynircioğlu, Z. F. (1995). Covert rehearsal of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plancher, G., Lévêque, Y., Fanuel, L., Piquandet, G., & Tillmann, B. (2018). Boosting maintenance in working memory with temporal regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(5), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povel, D. J., & Essens, P. (1985). Perception of temporal patterns. Music Perception, 2(4), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purnell-Webb, P., & Speelman, C. P. (2008). Effects of music on memory for text. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(3), 927–957. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.3.927-957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, C. K., & Taylor, T. L. (2019). Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 73(4), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reisberg, D., Smith, J. D., Baxter, D. A., & Sonenshine, M. (1989). “Enacted” auditory images are ambiguous; “Pure” auditory images are not. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41(3-A), 619–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748908402385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2014). Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 42(4), 609–621. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7
   Google Scholar
• Schendel, Z. A., & Palmer, C. (2007). Suppression effects on musical and verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, M. J. (2012). Effects of melodic complexity and rhythm on working memory as measured by digit recall performance. Music and Medicine, 4(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943862111424415
   Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G. (2017). PsyToolKit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, K.A., & Arnell, K.M. (2012). New considerations for the cognitive locus of impairment in the irrelevant-sound effect. Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0194-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37–76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann, B., & Dowling, W. J. (2007). Memory decreases for prose, but not for poetry. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, M., & Rostron, A. B. (1972). Brief auditory storage: A modification of Sperling's paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 36, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(72)90021-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representation of unattended sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.25.4.1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., & Jones, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1750–1754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld [The effects of field formation in the trace field]. Psychologische Forschung [Psychological Research] (in German), 18(1), 299–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02409636
   Google Scholar
• Yeni, M., & Amelia, R. (2020). Teaching alphabet for young learners through song. Journal of English Language and Education, 5, 12–22. https://jele.or.id/index.php/jele/index
   Google Scholar