Do adult ESL learners’ and their teachers’ goals for improving grammar in writing correspond?

References

• Barkhuizen, G. (1998). Discovering learners’ perceptions of ESL classroom teaching/learning activities in a South African context. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., & Lewis, M. (2002). Learner perspectives of success in an EAP writing course. Assessing Writing, 8, 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D.R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writingJournal of Second Language Writing,14(3), 191–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, J. (2010). A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 219–244.
   Google Scholar
• Block, D. (1994). A day in the life of a class: Teacher/learner perceptions of task purpose in conflict. System, 22, 473–486.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, M.W. (2006). The language of intentions for writing improvement: A systemic functional analysis. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors (pp. 108–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. (2009). Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 57–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. (1998). Learning the literacies of primary and secondary schooling. In F. Christie & R. Mission (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 47–73). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (2006). Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, A., Busch, M., & Zhou, A. (2002). Investigating learners' goals in the context of adult second-language writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam & S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 11. New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 189–208). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. (2007). An activity theory analysis of three instructors’ knowledge about teaching writing in a pre-university English-for-Academic-Purposes course: Teacher mind as mediated action (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J., Erdosy, U., & Cumming, A. (2006). A study of contrasts: ESL and university instructors' goals for writing improvement. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors (pp. 50–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Basturkmenm, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 165–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D.R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645–672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frodesen, J. (2001). Grammar in writing. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed., pp. 233–248). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Frodesen, J., & Holten, C. (2003). Grammar and the ESL writing class. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 141–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gatbonton, E. (1999). Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Modern Language Journal, 83, 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A. (1998). An exploratory study of goal setting and the nature of articulated goals in second language writing development. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 4, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, S.A.A. (2010). ESP students’ views of ESL grammar learning. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 10(3), 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429–448.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. (2009). Grammar and writing – The international debate. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley & M. Nystrand (Eds.), Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 182–193). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. (Ed.). (2010). Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2005). Ways of knowing: Writing with grammar in mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34–51.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, S. (1984). The idea of a writing center. College English, 46, 433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do when they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, T. (2005). The role of grammar in TESL and composition. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 153–162). Boston: Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistic perspective. Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (1994). Think-aloud protocol analysis beyond the black box. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N., & Lightbown, P.M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 59–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (2010). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton's critique of the correction debate. System, 38(4), 626–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J., & Hsu, Y.P. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelderen, A. (2010). Does explicit teaching of grammar help students to become better writers? Insights from empirical research. In T. Locke (Ed.), Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom (pp. 109–128). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, A. (2009). What adult ESL learners say about improving grammar and vocabulary in their writing for academic purposes. Language Awareness, 18(1), 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, A., Busch M., Gentil G., Eouanzoui K., & Cumming, A. (2006). Students' goals for ESL and university courses. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors (pp. 29–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar