Talking, tuning in and noticing: exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction

References

• Adams , R. 2003 . L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development . Language Teaching Research , 7 : 347 – 376 . doi: 10.1191/1362168803lr127oa
   Google Scholar
• Adams , R. 2007 . “ Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? ” . In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies , Edited by: Mackey , A. 29 – 51 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Anderson , J. 1983 . “ The architecture of cognition ” . Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University .
   Google Scholar
• Bygate , M. and Samuda , V. 2009 . “ Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose and involvement within the interaction approach ” . In Multiple perspectives on interaction in SLA: Research in honor of Susan M. Gass , Edited by: Mackey , A. and Polio , C. 90 – 116 . New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Cao , Y. 2009 . Understanding the notion of interdependence, and the dynamics of willingness to communicate, Unpublished doctoral dissertation , New Zealand : University of Auckland .
   Google Scholar
• Cao , Y. and Philp , J. 2006 . Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behaviour in whole class, group and dyadic interaction . System , 34 : 480 – 493 . doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
   Google Scholar
• de Bot , K. 1996 . The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis . Language Learning , 46 : 529 – 555 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser , R. M. 2007 . Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology , New York : Cambridge University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente , M. J. 2002 . Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 24 : 81 – 112 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263102001043
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , R. 1991 . “ The interaction hypothesis: A critical evaluation ” . In Language acquisition in the second/foreign language classroom , Edited by: Sadtono , E. 179 – 114 . Singapore : SEAMEO Regional Language Centre .
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , R. and He , X. 1999 . The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21 : 285 – 301 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263199002077
   Google Scholar
• Ellis , R. , Tanaka , Y. and Yamazaki , A. 1994 . Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings . Language Learning , 44 : 449 – 491 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlam , R. and Loewen , S. 2009 . Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction . The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes , 66 : 877 – 905 . doi: 10.3138/cmlr.66.6.877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii , A. 2005 . “ Individual differences in task performance: Aptitude profiles, orientation to form, and second language production in the EFL classroom ” . In (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) , Georgetown University .
   Google Scholar
• Fujii , A. and Mackey , A. 2009 . Interactional feedback in learner–learner interactions in a task-based EFL classroom . IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching , 47 : 267 – 301 .
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mayo , M.D.P. and Pica , T . 2000 . L2 learner interaction in a foreign language setting: Are learning needs addressed? . International Review of Applied Linguistics , 38 : 35 – 58 . doi: 10.1515/iral.2000.38.1.35
   Google Scholar
• Gass , S. M. 1997 . Input, interaction, and the second language learner , Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Gass , S. M. 2003 . “ Input and interaction ” . In Handbook of second language acquisition , Edited by: Doughty , C. and Long , M. 224 – 255 . Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Gass , S. M. and Varonis , E. 1985 . “ Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning ” . In Input in second language acquisition , Edited by: Gass , S. and Madden , C. 149 – 161 . Rowley , MA : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita , N. 2001 . The effect of learner proficiency on corrective feedback and modified output in non-native–non-native interaction . System , 29 : 267 – 287 . doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00015-X
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita , N. 2003 . Positive and negative input in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 25 : 1 – 36 . (1), doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000019
   Google Scholar
• Izumi , S. , Bigelow , M. , Fujiwara , M. and Fearnow , S. 1999 . Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21 : 421 – 452 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263199003034
   Google Scholar
• Izumi , S. and Bigelow , M. 2000 . Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? . TESOL Quarterly , 34 : 239 – 278 . doi: 10.2307/3587952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izumi , S. 2002 . Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 24 : 541 – 577 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263102004023
   Google Scholar
• Kowal , M. and Swain , M. 1994 . Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students’ language awareness . Language Awareness , 3 : 73 – 93 . doi: 10.1080/09658416.1994.9959845
   Google Scholar
• Kowal , M. and Swain , M. 1997 . “ From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote metalinguistic awareness in the French immersion classroom? ” . In Immersion education: International perspectives , Edited by: Johnson , R. and Swain , M. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press . (chap. 14).
   Google Scholar
• Krashen , S. 1998 . Comprehensible output? . System , 26 : 175 – 182 . doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00002-5
   Google Scholar
• Linnell , J. 1995 . Can negotiation provide a context for learning syntax in a second language? . Working Papers in Educational Linguistics , 11 : 83 – 103 .
   Google Scholar
• Long , M. H. 1996 . “ The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition ” . In Handbook of language acquisition: Second language acquisition , Edited by: Ritchie , W.C. 413 – 468 . New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Long , M. H. 2005 . Second language needs analysis , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. 1999 . Input, interaction, and second language development . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 21 : 557 – 587 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263199004027
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. 2002 . Beyond production: Learners’ perceptions about interactional processes . International Journal of Educational Research , 37 : 379 – 394 . doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00011-9
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. 2006 . Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning . Applied Linguistics , 27 : 377 – 404 . doi: 10.1093/applin/ami051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. , Adams , R. , Stafford , C. and Winke , P. 2010 . Exploring the relationships between modified output and working memory capacity . Language Learning , 60 : 501 – 533 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. , Gass , S. and McDonough , K. 2000 . How do learners perceive interactional feedback? . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 22 : 471 – 497 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004022
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. and Goo , J. 2007 . “ Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis ” . In Conversational interaction and second language acquisition , Edited by: Mackey , A. 407 – 450 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. , McDonough , K. , Fujii , A. and Tatsumi , T. 2001 . Investigating learners’ reports about the L2 classroom . International Review of Applied Linguistics , 39 : 285 – 308 . doi: 10.1515/iral.2001.006
   Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. , Oliver , R. and Leeman , J. 2003 . Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads . Language Learning , 53 : 35 – 66 . doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey , A. , Philp , J. , Fujii , A. , Egi , T. and Tatsumi , T. 2002 . “ Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development ” . In Individual differences and instructed language learning , Edited by: Robinson , P. 181 – 208 . Amsterdam : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• McDonough , K. 2004 . Learner–learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context . System , 32 : 207 – 224 . doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003
   Google Scholar
• McDonough , K. 2005 . Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 27 : 79 – 103 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263105050047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muranoi , H. 2007 . “ Output practice in the L2 classroom ” . In Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology , Edited by: DeKeyser , R.M. 51 – 84 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nobuyoshi , J. and Ellis , R. 1993 . Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition . ELT J , 47 : 203 – 210 . doi: 10.1093/elt/47.3.203
   Google Scholar
• Ogino , M. 2008 . Modified output in response to clarification requests and second language Waikato , The University of Waikato Unpublished doctoral thesis
   Google Scholar
• Philp , J. 2003 . Constraints on noticing the gap: Non-native speakers. noticing of recasts in NS.NNS interaction . Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 25 : 99 – 126 . doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000044
   Google Scholar
• Pica , T. , Lincoln-Porter , F. , Paninos , D. and Linnell , J. 1996 . Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output and feedback needs of L2 learners? . TESOL Quarterly , 30 : 59 – 83 . doi: 10.2307/3587607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato , M. and Lyster , R . 2007 . “ Modified output of Japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor versus feedback types ” . In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies , Edited by: Mackey , A. Oxford : Oxford University Press . (chap. 5).
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , R. 2001 . “ Attention ” . In Cognition and second language instruction , Edited by: Robinson , P. 3 – 32 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt , R. and Frota , S. 1986 . “ Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese ” . In Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition , Edited by: Day , R. 237 – 322 . Rowley , MA : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Seliger , H. 1983 . “ Learner interaction in the classroom and its effect on language acquisition ” . In Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition , Edited by: Seliger , H. W. and Long , M. H. 89 – 107 . Massachussetts : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Shehadeh , A. 2002 . Comprehensible output, from occurrence to acquisition: An agenda for acquisitional research . Language Learning , 52 : 597 – 647 . doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehadeh , A. 2003 . Learner output, hypothesis testing, and internalizing linguistic knowledge . System , 31 : 155 – 171 . doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00018-6
   Google Scholar
• Skehan , P. 1998 . A cognitive approach to language learning , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Storch , N. 2002 . Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work . Language Learning , 52 : 119 – 158 . doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 1985 . “ Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development ” . In Input in second language acquisition , Edited by: Gass , S. and Madden , C. 235 – 253 . Rowley , MA : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 1993 . The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough . Canadian Modern Language Review , 50 : 158 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 1995 . “ Three functions of output in second language learning ” . In For H.G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language. A festschrift on the occasion of his 60th birthday , Edited by: Cook , G. and Seidhofer , B. 125 – 144 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 1998 . “ Focus on form through conscious reflection ” . In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition , Edited by: Doughty , C. and Williams , J. 64 – 82 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 2000 . “ The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue ” . In Sociocultural theory and second language learning , Edited by: Lantolf , J. P. 97 – 114 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 2005 . “ The output hypothesis: Theory and research ” . In Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning , Edited by: Hinkel , E. 471 – 484 . Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. and Lapkin , S. 1995 . Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning . Applied Linguistics , 16 : 371–391. doi: 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. and Lapkin , S. 1998 . Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together . Modern Language Journal , 82 : 320 – 337 . doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima , H. and Ellis , R. 1999 . “ Output enhancement and the acquisition of the past tense ” . In Learning a second language through interaction , Edited by: Ellis , R. 173 – 188 . Amsterdam : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Tognini , R. , Philp , J. and Oliver , R. 2010 . Rehearsing, conversing, working it out: Second language use and peer interaction . Australian Review of Applied Linguistics , 33 : 28.1–28.25 doi: 10.2104/aral1028
   Google Scholar
• Van den Branden , K . 1997 . Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output . Language Learning , 47 : 589 – 636 . doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten , B. 2004 . “ Input processing in second language acquisition ” . In Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary , Edited by: VanPatten , B. Mahwah , NJ : Laurence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Varonis , E. and Gass , S. 1985 . Non-native/non-native conversation: A model for negotiation of meaning . Applied Linguistics , 6 : 71 – 90 . doi: 10.1093/applin/6.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe , Y. and Swain , M. 2007 . Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners . Language Teaching Research , 11 : 121 – 142 . doi: 10.1177/136216880607074599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , J. 1999 . Learner-generated attention to form . Language Learning , 51 : 303 – 346 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , J. 2001 . The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form . System , 29 : 325 – 340 . doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7
   Google Scholar