Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context

References

• Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: A protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal, 41(4), 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• ATLAS.ti (Version 5) [Computer software]. (2004). Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Casanave, C.P. (2009). Training for writing or training for reality? Challenges facing EFL writing teachers and students in language teacher education programs. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 256–280). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2010). Raising L2 listeners’ metacognitive awareness: A sociocultural theory perspective. Language Awareness, 19(4), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (Ed.). (2006). Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J., Railey, K., & Boshoff, P. (1993). The implication of cognitive modes in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 203–225.
   Google Scholar
• Durst, R.K. (2006). Writing at the postsecondary level. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change (pp. 78–107). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. (1983). The web of meaning: Essays on writing, teaching, learning, and thinking. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 960–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L. (1990). The role of task representation in reading to write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, & M. Kantz (Eds.), Reading to write: Exploring a cognitive and social process (pp. 35–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing. Learning and Instruction, 9, 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (2004). What triggers revision? In L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Revision: Cognitive and instructional process (pp. 9–21). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (2006). New directions in writing theory. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 28–40). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• He, T. (2005). Effects of mastery and performance goals on the composition strategy use of adult ESL writers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 407–431.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, L. (1997). Assessing the metacognitive growth of ESL student writers. TESL-EJ, 3(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R.T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I. (2001). Hearing voices: L2 students’ experiences in L2 writing course. In T. Silva & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 17–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlhaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). ‘Completely different worlds’: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 39–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2006). Second-language composition teaching and learning. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change (pp. 141–169). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manchón, R., Roca, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. (1998). The arts of complicity: Pragmatism and the culture of schooling. College English, 61(1), 10–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs and motivation in writing development. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 158–170). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, D. (1998). An inquiry into language-switching in second language composing processes. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 413–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalisability of writing scores. An application of structural equation modelling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, T. (1992). L1 vs. L2 writing: ESL graduate students’ perceptions. TESL Canada Journal, 10(1), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 67–82). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G.A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 324–336). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. (1996). Learning how to teach ESL writing. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 97–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27(4), 537–556.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2003). Switching to first language among writers with differing second-language proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 347–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(3), 225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in SLA: The neglected variable. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 44–64). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. (2005). Writers’ mental representations of the intended audience and of the rhetorical purpose for writing and the strategies that they employed when they composed. System, 33(1), 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. (2006). Nine Chinese students writing in Canadian university courses. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors (pp. 73–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• You, X. (2004). ‘The choice made from no choice’: English writing instruction in a Chinese University. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268–288.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar