From the field, to the Web, and back again: incorporating Internet methods into language ideology research

References

• Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A., & Fitzsimons, G.M. (2002). Can you see the real me?: Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. DOI: 10.1111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, R.D., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347–367. DOI: 10.1177/152582202237725
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, M.D. (2010). Online data research: A methodological overview. Psychology Review, 15(4), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (1985). The grammar of consciousness and the consciousness of grammar. American Ethnologist, 12(4), 725–737. DOI: 10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J.H. (1998). ‘Today there is no respect’: Nostalgia, ‘respect,’ and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P.V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 68–86). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. (2003). Misrecognition unmasked? ‘Polynomic’ language, expert statuses and orthographic practices in Corsican schools. Pragmatics (IPrA), 13, 515–537.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Contexts and consequences of essentializing discourses. In A. Duchene & M. Heller (Eds.), Discourses of endangerment (pp. 57–75). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192.DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joinson, A.N. (2005). Internet behaviour and the design of virtual methods. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 21–34). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, P.V. (1998). Arizona tewa kiva speech as manifestation of a dominant language ideology. In B. Schieffelin, K. Wooldard, & P.V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 103–122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroskrity, P.V. (2009). Embodying the reversal of language shift: Agency, incorporation, and language ideological change in the western mono community of central California. In P.V. Kroskrity & M.C. Field (Eds.), Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian country (pp. 190–210). Tucson: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The discursive construction of European identities: A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: The European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU's language and multilingualism policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136. DOI: 10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, R., & Beckman, S.C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 189–203. DOI: 10.1108/13522750510592454
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M.P. (Ed.). (2009). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. (16th ed.). SIL International. Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.org/ethno_docs/distribution.asp?by=size
   Google Scholar
• Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mar-Molinero, C. (2000). The politics of language in the Spanish-speaking world: From colonisation to globalisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson, K., & Zanna, M.P. (1988). The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 221–233. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(88)90015-5
   Google Scholar
• Messing, J. (2007). Multiple ideologies and competing discourses: Language shift in Tlaxcala, Mexico. Language in Society, 36, 555–577. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404507070443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, T.M. (2008). Language testing and citizenship: A language ideological debate in Sweden. Language in Society, 37, 27–59. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404508080020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi, C. (2004). Contacto de dialectos en Los Ángeles: Español chicano y español salvadoreño. In M. del Carmen, M. Leyva, & R.M.O. Ciscomani (Eds.), VII encuentro internacional de lingüística en el noroeste [7th international meeting of linguistics in the northwest] (pp. 277–293). Hermosillo: Editorial UniSon.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi, C. (2009). Normatividad y diglosia en Los Ángeles: Un modelo de contacto lingüístico. In F. Colombo Airoldi & A. Soler Arrechalde (Eds.), Normatividad y dialectología [Normativity and dialectology] (pp. 160–183). Mexico: UNAM.
   Google Scholar
• Parodi, C. (2011). El otro méxico: Español chicano, koineización y diglosia en los ángeles, California. In R.B. Villanueva & P.M. Butragueño (Eds.), Realismo en el análisis de corpus orales: Primer coloquio de cambio y variación lingüística [Realism in the analysis of oral corpora: 1st meeting on change and linguistic variation] (pp. 217–243). Mexico: El Colegio de México.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.W. (2012a). Generational divisions: Dialect divergence in a Los Angeles-Salvadoran household. Hispanic Research Journal, 13(4), 297–316. DOI: 10.1179/1468273712Z.00000000017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C.W. (2012b). Reallocation of pronouns through contact: In-the-moment identity construction amongst southern California Salvadorans. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(5), 669–690. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsey, A. (1990). Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist, 92, 346–361. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, W.S. (2001). In the flesh or online? Exploring qualitative research methodologies. Qualitative Research, 1(2), 147–168. DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100203
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P.R. Clyne, W. Hanks, & C.L. Hoftbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on units and levels (pp. 193–247). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1996). Monoglot standard in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In R.K.S. Macauly & D. Brenneis (Eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology (pp. 284–306). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (2010). Society, polity, and language community: An enlightenment trinity in anthropological perspective. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(3), 339–363. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.9.3.01sil
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloman, M.B. (1996). Targeting trendsetters. Marketing Research Forum, 8(2), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B. (Ed.). (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spolsky, B., & Shohamy, E. (1999). The Languages of Israel: Policy, ideology, and practice. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Swigart, L. (2000). The limits of legitimacy: Language ideology and shift in contemporary Senegal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10, 90–130. DOI:10.1525/jlin.2000.10.1.90
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Language in political institutions of multilingual states and European Union. In B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe (pp. 625–641). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., Krzyżanowski, M., & Forchtner, B. (2012). The interplay of language ideologies and contextual cues in multilingual interactions: Language choice and code-switching in European Union institutions. Language in Society, 41, 157–186. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404512000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentella, A.C. (2001). English-only on the job: A comparison of racial and ethnic attitudes toward the right of employers to restrict employee language rights. Paper delivered at the American Anthropological Association (AAA) Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar