L2 learners’ recognition of unfamiliar idioms composed of familiar words

References

• Alali, F.A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same as or different from teaching single words? TESOL Journal, 3, 153–180.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, H. (2004). The effect of typographic salience on the look up and comprehension of unknown formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). Is alliteration mnemonic without awareness-raising? Language Awareness, 23, 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortfeld, H. (2002). What native and non-native speakers' images for idioms tell us about figurative language. In R.R. Heredia, & J. Altarriba ( Eds.), Advances in psychology: Vol. 134. Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 275–295). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, T., & Yazici, I. (2004). Idiom processing in L2: Through rose-colored glasses. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 4, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Lai, H. (2013). EFL learners' awareness of metonymy-metaphor continuum in figurative expressions. Language Awareness, 21, 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślicka, A. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22, 115–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślicka, A. (2010). Formulaic language in L2: Storage, retrieval and production of idioms by second language learners. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner's mind (pp. 149–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cieślicka, A.B. (2011). Suppression of literal meanings in L2 idiom processing: Does context help? Studies in Second Language Learning & Teaching, 1, 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29, 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T.C. (1999). Process of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 233–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285–301.
   Google Scholar
• Flores d'Arcais, B.B. (1993). The comprehension and semantic interpretation of idioms. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 79–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R.W. (1980). Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory and Cognition, 8, 148–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., & Blanchet, J. (2014). Language awareness and perception of connected speech in a second language. Language Awareness, 23, 91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1989). A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: Deceptive transparency. AILA Review, 6, 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess. In J. Coady, & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: Teacher Training Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008a). The mnemonic effect of noticing alliteration in lexical chunks. Applied Linguistics, 29, 200–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F. (2008b). Phonemic repetition and the learning of lexical chunks: The power of assonance. System, 36, 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 671–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. (2008). Idioms: Description, comprehension, acquisition, and pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, M., & Andrade, A.I. (2014). Promoting phonological awareness in pre-primary education: Possibilities of the ‘awakening to languages’ approach. Language Awareness, 23, 304–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Malt, B.C., & Eiter, B. (2004). Even with a green card, you can be put out to pasture and still have to work: Non-native intuitions of the transparency of common English idioms. Memory and Cognition, 32, 896–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, R., & Murphy, V.A. (2011). Effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 267–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., & Nordie, J. (1999). Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicoll, J., & Lee, J. (2011). Collaborative consciousness-raising tasks in EAL classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nattinger, J.R., & DeCarrico, J.S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paribakht, T.S., & Wesche M. (1999). Reading and ‘incidental’ L2 vocabulary acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 195–224.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Underwood, G. (2004). Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 173–189). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 153–172). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principles and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21, 463–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 250–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyzik, E. (2011). Second language idiom learning: The effects of lexical knowledge and pedagogical sequencing. Language Teaching Research, 15, 413–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar