An explicit-inductive approach to grammar in Irish-medium immersion schools

References

• Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2002). The PACE model: A story-based approach to meaning and form for standards-based language learning. The French Review, 76(2), 265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., & Tenenbaum, H.R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Office. (2012). This is Ireland: Highlights from census 2011: Part 1. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Mannion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2007). Language education policy profile Ireland. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A frameworks for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671–684.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentik.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, L. (2000). Why focus on learning rather than teaching: From theory to practice. Paper presented at the IATEFL conference on learner independence, Kraków.
   Google Scholar
• Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1996). Studies in immersion education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Decco, W. (1996). The induction-deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities of the didactic reality. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34(2), 95–118. doi:10.1515/iral.1996.34.2.95
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R.M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & H.M. Long ( Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C., & Williams, J. ( Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. doi:10.1017/S027226310505014X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2001). Form-focused instruction and second language learning. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2002a). Grammar teaching-practice or consciousness raising. InJ. C. Richards & W. Renandja (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp.167–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2002b). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos ( Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17–34). Mahwah, NJ, and London: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and pedagogy. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 242–260. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaelscoileanna (2014). Staitisticí [Statistics]. Retrieved from http://www.gaelscoileanna.ie/en/about/statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, K. (2013). The neglected combination: A case for explicit-inductiveinstruction in teaching pragmatics in ESL. TESL Canada Journal, 30(SI 7), 150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, K. (2014). Inductive or deductive? The impact of method of instruction on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in EFL. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (1937). Constitution of Ireland- Bunreacht na hÉireann. Dublin: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Haight, C.E., Herron, C., & Cole, S.P. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 288–310. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb03202.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerly, H. (1991). Fluency and accuracy: Toward balance in language teaching and learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, B. (1993). Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245–259.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Forde, P., Nic Fhearaile, S., & O'Gorman, M. (2006). An Ghaeilge sna bunscoileanna: Treochtaí náisiúnta fadtéarmacha in inniúlacht [Irish in the primary schools: Long-term national trends in achievement]. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A., Andrews, Á., & Ó Cainín, P. (2002). Developing linguistic accuracy in Irish medium primary schools. Bangor, ME: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. The French Review, 65(5), 708–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P.M. and Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–181. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2006). Language and literacy in Irish-medium primary schools: Descriptions of practice. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2015). Primary language curriculum: Irish-medium schools. Retrieved from http://www.curriculumonline.ie/Primary/Curriculum-Areas/Language-New-Junior-infants-2nd-class
   Google Scholar
• Nic Pháidín, C. (2003). “Cén fáth nach?” - Ó chanúint go criól [“Why not?” – from dialect to creole]. In R. Ní Mhianáin ( Ed.), Idir lúibíní: Aistí ar an léitheoireacht agus ar an litearthacht [ Between brackets: Essays on reading and literature] (pp. 113–130). Dublin: Cois Life.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Dhiorbháin, A. (2010). FFI agus an fheasacht teanga [FFI and language awareness] ( Unpublished MA). National University of Ireland Galway.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Dhiorbháin, A., & O Duibhir, P. (2012). Múineadh na gramadaí sna hardranganna i mbunscoileanna Gaeltachta/lán-Ghaeilge: Cur chuige rathúil taitneamhach [Teaching of grammar in senior classes in Gaeltacht/all-Irish primary schools]. Cur i láthair ag Comhdháil Bhliantúil Ghaelscoileanna, Gaillimh [Presentation at Gaelscoileanna Annual Conference, Galway].
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Baoill, D. (1981). Earráidí scríofa Gaeilge - cuid III, réamhfhocail agus comhréir [ Written errors in Irish – part III, prepositions and syntax]. Baile Átha Cliath: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Duibhir, P. (2009). The spoken Irish of sixth class pupils in Irish immersion schools (Unpublished PhD). Dublin: Trinity College.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Duibhir, P. (2011). I thought that we had good Irish’: Irish immersion students’ insights into their target language use. In D.J. Tedick, D. Christian, & T. Williams Fortune ( Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp. 145–165). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Duibhir, P., Ní Dhiorbháin, A., & Cosgrove, J. (2016). An inductive approach to grammar teaching in grade 5 & 6 Irish immersion classes. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4(1), 33–58. doi:10.1075/jicb.4.1.02dui
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Duibhir, P., Ó Cathalláin, S., NigUidhir, G., Ní Thuairisg, L., & Cosgrove, J. (2015). Anailís ar mhúnlaí soláthair Gaelscolaíochta [Analysis of models of Irish-medium school provision]. Dublin: North/South Committee on Irish Medium Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Giollagáin, C., & Charlton, M. (2015). Nuashonrú ar an staidéar cuimsitheach teangeolaíoch ar úsáid na Gaeilge sa Ghaeltacht: 2006–2011 [Update of the comprehensive linguistic survey of the use of Irish in the Gaeltacht: 2006–2011]. Gaillimh: Údarás na Gaeltachta.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Riagáin, P. (1997). Language policy and social reproduction Ireland 1893-1993. Oxford: Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 27–67. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014674
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M.D. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511–556. doi:10.1017/S0272263199004015
   Google Scholar
• Salaberry, R. ( n.d.). Lesson three: Induction on a continuum. Retrieved from: https://coerll.utexas.edu/methods/modules/grammar/03/
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis ( Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. In R. Day ( Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson ( Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seliger, H. (1975). Inductive method and deductive method in language teaching: A re-examination. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 13, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395–403. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simard, D., French, L., & Fortier, V. (2007). Elicited metalinguistic reflection and second language learning: Is there a link? System, 35(4), 509–522. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, H.H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 93–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, H.H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 93–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A.M. (2009 ). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. doi:10.1080/09658410903197264
   Google Scholar
• Svalberg, A.M. (2016). Language awareness research: Where we are now. Language Awareness, 25(1–2), 4. doi:10.1080/09658416.2015.1122027.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.M. Gass & C.G. Madden ( Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. William ( Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, P.D., Wagner, E., & Moranski, K. (2013). ‘Co-constructing’ explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 279–303. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S., & Engelhard, G., Jr. (2011). Using Rasch measurement theory to examine two instructional approaches for teaching and learning of French grammar. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 267–282. doi:10.1080/00220671003733815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, S., Herron, C., Cole, S.P., & York, H. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate-level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 353–380. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2007). Cruinneas na Gaeilge scríofa sna hiar-bhunscoileanna lán-Ghaeilge i mBaile Átha Cliath [ Irish written accuracy in all-Irish post-primary schools in Dublin]. Dublin: An Chomhairle um Oideachas Gaeltachta agus Gaelscolaíochta.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, H.P. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122–141.
   Google Scholar