‘Let's think about it together:’ how teachers differentiate discourse to mediate collaboration among linguistically diverse students

References

• Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. (Ed.). (1996). Differentiation and diversity in the primary school. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L., Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Knouzi, I. (2010). Mediating between scientific and spontaneous concepts through languaging. Language Awareness, 19(2), 89–110. doi: 10.1080/09658410903440755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, B.E., & Toribio, A.J. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A.S. (2006). The place of World Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57, 586–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (2003). Language awareness. ELT Journal, 57(1), 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C.B., & Beck, S.W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In A.C. Graesser, M.A. Gernsbacher, & S.R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165–197). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V.J. (2012). Multi-competence. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3768–3774). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: Pedagogy for learning and teaching? Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais, D., Walsh, N., Armand, F., & Maraillet, E. (2008). Collaboration and co-construction of knowledge during language awareness activities in Canadian elementary school. Language Awareness, 17(2), 139–155. doi:10.1080/09658410802146685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition (Vol. 24). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284–302.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A.D., & Westgate, D.P. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Re-conceptualizing ‘Scaffolding’ and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gánem-Gutiérrez, G.A., & Harun, H. (2011). Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: An application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness, 20(2), 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, O. (2008). Multilingual language awareness and teacher education. In P. Duff & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2130–2145). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2010.551125
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, M. (2005). Cultural diversity, motivation, and differentiation. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 218–225. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 193–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1016209010120
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. (2013). Classroom code-switching: Three decades of research. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T., Villegas, A.M., & Freedson-Gonzalez, M. (2008). Linguistically responsive teacher education preparing classroom teachers to teach English language learners. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 361–373. doi: 10.1177/0022487108322110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luria, A.R. (1982). Language and cognition. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• MacSwan, J. (Ed.). (2014). Grammatical theory and bilingual codeswitching. Linguistics series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2012). How do teachers participate, mediate, and intervene in the co-construction of language knowledge during learner interactions? In B. Yoon & H.K. Kim (Eds.), Teachers' roles in second language learning: Classroom applications of sociocultural theory (pp. 103–122). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2013). “I don't feel as embarrassed because we're all learning”: Discursive positioning among adolescents becoming multilingual. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014). “What do you want to say?” How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Journal of Multilingual Research, 8, 208–230.
   Google Scholar
• Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2015). Multilingual awareness and heritage language education: Children's multimodal representations of their multilingualism. Language Awareness, 24(3), 197–215. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2015.1072208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Bristol: Multilingual matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analyzing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C.J. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. F. Ellens (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 238–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. (2010). Mobilizing culture, language, and educational practices: Fulfilling the promises of Mendez and Brown. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 451–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M.C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta, A.S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93–121.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, I. (2004). Functions of code switching in schoolchildren's conversations. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. (2012). Good questions: Great ways to differentiate mathematics instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, B., & Saunders, L. (1993). Differentiation in practice: Responding to the needs of all pupils. Educational Research, 35, 127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). ‘New’ mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 820–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2013). A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 101–129.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational leadership, 57, 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). This issue: Differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 183–184. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4403_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). Differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C.A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C.M., Moon, T.R., Brimijoin, K., … Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2013). Group dynamics in the language classroom: embodied participation as active reception in the collective Zone of Proximal Development. Classroom Discourse, 4(1), 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, L. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L. (2014). Negotiating funds of knowledge and symbolic competence in the complementary school classrooms. Language and Education, 28(2), 161–180. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2013.800549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar