Bridging ‘what I said’ and ‘why I said it’: the role of metapragmatic awareness in L2 request performance

References

• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2014). Awareness of meaning of conventional expressions in second-language pragmatics. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2015). Operationalizing conversation in studies of instructional effect in L2 pragmatics. System, 48, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. P. (2016). Authentic L2 interaction as material for a pragmatic awareness-raising activity. Language Awareness, 25(3), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2016). The teaching of pragmatics by native and nonnative language teachers: What they know and what they report doing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 561–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 33–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. J. (2016). Request modification in synchronous computer-mediated communication: The role of focused instruction. Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 484–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. G. H. (2015). Hong Kong English: Attitudes, identity, and use. Asian Englishes, 17(3), 184–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinart & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gal'perin, P. (1992). Linguistic consciousness and some questions of the relationship between language and thought. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4), 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, M. (2017). Symbolic competence in multilingual interactions in a university setting: A complexity analysis. Multilingua, 36(1), 59–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henery, A. (2015). On the development of metapragmatic awareness abroad: Two case studies exploring the role of expert-mediation. Language Awareness, 24(4), 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara, N. (2010). Maintaining an optimal distance: Nonnative speakers’ pragmatic choice. In A. Mahboob (Ed.), Non-native speakers of English in TESOL: Identity, politics, and perceptions (pp. 35–53). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, N., & Tarone, E. (2009). Emulating and resisting pragmatic norms: Learner subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 101–128). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1992). Models for non-native Englishes. In B. Braj (ed.), The other tongue: English across cultures (pp. 48–74). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J., & Taguchi, N. (2016). Learner–learner interaction during collaborative pragmatic tasks: The role of cognitive and pragmatic tasks. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jorda, M. P. S. (2003). Metapragmatic awareness and pragmatic production of third language learners of English: A focus on request acts realizations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2006). Assessing EFL learners’ interlangauge pragmatic knowledge: Implications for testers and teachers. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McConachy, T. (2013). Exploring the meta-pragmatic realm in English language teaching. Language Awareness, 22(2), 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla Cruz, M. (2015). Fostering EF/SL learners’ meta-pragmatic awareness of complaints and their interactive effects. Language Awareness, 24(2), 123–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, T. T. (2003). Hong Kong English: A stillborn variety? English Today, 19(2), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, W. (2014). A longitudinal investigation into L2 learners’ cognitive processes during study aboard. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 575–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Riddiford, N., & Holmes, J. (2015). Assisting the development of sociopragmatic skills: Negotiating refusals at work. System, 48, 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roever, C., & Al-Gahtani, S. (2015). Multiple requests in Arabic as a second language. Multilingua, 34(3), 405–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2010). Longitudinal studies in interlanguage pragmatics. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (pp. 333–362). Berlin: De Gruyer Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, individual differences, and pragmatic competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a Chinese study abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 775–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thi, N., Thi, D., Anh, N., & Thi, P. (2015). Teaching email requests in the academic context: A focus on the role of corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 24(2), 169–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64(3), 549–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A., & Kinginger, C. (2013). Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 282–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A., Weber, A., & Gomez-Laich, M. P. (2016). Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verscheuren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Verscheuren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439–456.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2015). Teaching English as an international language in China: Investigating university teachers' and students' attitudes towards China English. System, 53, 60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodfield, H. (2010). What lies beneath? Verbal report in interlanguage requests in English. Multilingua, 29, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyner, L., & Cohen, A. D. (2015). Second language pragmatic ability: Individual differences according to environment. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 519–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. Y. (2014). A phantom to kill: The challenges for Chinese learners to use English as a global language. English Today, 30(4), 34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar