Metalinguistic awareness in L2 vocabulary acquisition: which factors influence learners’ motivations of form-meaning connections?

References

• Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52(2), 323–363. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcroft, J. (2003). Effects of questions about word meaning during Spanish L2 lexical acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 546–561. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. (2016). Model selection and model averaging based on information criteria (AICc and alike). R package version 1.15.6. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Beréndi, M., Csábi, S., & Kövecses, Z. (2008). Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg ( Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 65–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2006). Motivating multiword units: Rationale, mnemonic benefits, and cognitive style variables. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Medved Krajnovic, & J. Mihaljevic Djigunovic ( Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 169–190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008a). How cognitive linguistics can foster effective vocabulary teaching. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg ( Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 1–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008b). Structural elaboration by the sound (and feel) of it. In Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 329–353). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, H. W., Sanz, C., & Stafford, C. A. (2005). Individual differences: Age, sex, working memory and prior knowledge. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind & context in adult second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Deconinck, J., Boers, F., & Eyckmans, J. (2010). Helping learners engage with L2 words: The form–meaning fit. AILA Review, 23, 95–114. doi:10.1075/aila.23.06dec
   Google Scholar
• Deconinck, J., Boers, F., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). Looking for form-meaning motivation in new L2 words: A think-aloud study among proficient learners of English. English Text Construction, 7(2), 249–280. doi:10.1075/etc.7.2.04dec
   Google Scholar
• Deconinck, J., Boers, F., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). ‘Does the form of this word fit its meaning?’ The effect of learner-generated mapping elaborations on L2 word recall. Language Teaching Research, 21, 31–53. doi:10.1177/1362168815614048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long ( Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256–310). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Elgort, I., Candry, S., Boutorwick, T. J., Eyckmans, J., & Brysbaert, M. (2016). Contextual word learning with form-focused and meaning-focused elaboration: A comparative study. Applied Linguistics, advance online publication. doi:10.1093/applin/amw029
   Google Scholar
• Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282–295.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. J. (2002). The automatic cognate form assumption: Evidence for the parasitic model of vocabulary development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 69–87. doi:10.1515/iral.2002.008
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson ( Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (3 ed., pp. 258–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S. (2015). Influences of previously learned languages on the learning and use of additional languages. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera ( Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 69–86). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jessner, U. (1999). Metalinguistic awareness in multilinguals: Cognitive aspects of third language learning. Language Awareness, 8, 201–211. doi:10.1080/09658419908
   Google Scholar
• Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussmaul, P., & Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1995). Think-aloud protocol analysis in translation studies. TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction, 8(1), 177–199. doi:10.7202/037201ar
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer-Dvorkin, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 63(1), 149–166. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51. doi:10.1177/026553229901600103
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behav Res Methods, 44(2), 325–343. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2005). MCWord: An on‐line orthographic database of the English language. Retrieved from www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
   Google Scholar
• Morin, R. (2003). Derivational morphological analysis as a strategy for vocabulary acquisition in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 202–221. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, H. (1989). Using etymology in the classroom. ELT Journal, 43(1), 57–63. doi:10.1093/elt/43.1.57
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U. (2004). Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon, PH: Multlilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Roehr, K. (2008). Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(1), 67–106. doi:10.1515/cog.2008.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. doi:10.1177/1362168808089921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language and Education, 28, 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301. doi:10.1017/S027226310000917
   Google Scholar
• White, T. G., Power, M. A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 283–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar