Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: a large-scale survey

References

• Agudo, J. (2015). How do Spanish EFL learners perceive grammar instruction and corrective feedback? Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33(4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(31), 36–57. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000122
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2003). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs regarding aspects of language learning. Evaluation & Research in Education, 17(4), 207–222. doi: 10.1080/09500790308668303
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Abingdon, UK: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10 (4), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1978.tb02409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosenfeld, C. (1978). Students’ mini-theories of second language learning. Association Bulletin, 29(2), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students’ and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 44(4), 465–492.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartchava, E. (2012). Noticeability of corrective feedback, L2 development and learner beliefs (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Montreal University.
   Google Scholar
• Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86–109. doi: 10.1002/tesq.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama, A. (2007). Students’ perceptions of oral error correction. Japanese Language and Literature, 41(1), 61–92.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, R. G. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1995.tb00770.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41(2), 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. doi: 10.1111/modl.12315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. In Z. H. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 27–44). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004363
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54(1), 153–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382. doi: 10.2307/3586253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167–184. doi: 10.1017/S027226311200071X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109990520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40. doi: 10.1017/S0261444812000365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., Perdue, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004022
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• MOE of China (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China). (2007). College English curriculum requirements. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOE of China (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China). (2011). English curriculum for compulsory education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOE of China (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China) (2013). Education statistics for 2013. Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/s78/A03/moe_560/s8492/
   Google Scholar
• MOE of China (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China) (2016). Statistical bulletin of national education development in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A03/s180/moe_633/201607/t20160706_270976.html
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416–434. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn/
   Google Scholar
• Oladejo, J. (1993). Error correction in ESL: Learners’ preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10(2), 71–89. doi: 10.18806/tesl.v10i2.619
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, M., & Tomczyk, E. (2013). Differential effects of input-providing and output-inducing corrective feedback on the acquisition of english passive voice. In Language in cognition and affect (pp. 133–149). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The awareness-practice-feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakui, K., & Gaies, S. J. (1999). Investigating Japanese learners’ beliefs about language learning. System, 27(4), 473–492. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00046-9
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Feedback training in classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68(2), 507–545. doi: 10.1111/lang.12283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 147–163. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011931
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA–Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 593–610). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437–456. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N. E. (1998). The effect of common variance and structure pattern on random data eigenvalues: Implications for the accuracy of parallel analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(4), 541–568. doi: 10.1177/0013164498058004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., & Harvey, J. (2010). Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 421–443. doi: 10.1177/1362168810375365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnosfadrani, A. D. (2006). A comparison of the effects of implicit/explicit and immediate/delayed corrective feedback on learners’ performance in tailor-made tests. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1973). Opinions of university students about language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 7(1), 102–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1974.tb00088.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Q. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526–540. doi: 10.1017/S026144481600001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Q., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in china. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 27–48. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesely, P. M. (2012). Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), 98–117.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. (2008). Learners’ perception of corrective feedback in pair work. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 525–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. (2016). Voices from tertiary EFL classrooms in China: Investigating learner beliefs about oral corrective feedback. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching. [外语与外语教学], 2016 (1), 33–40.
   Google Scholar