Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning

References

• Amenós-Pons, J., Ahern, A., & Fuentes, P. G. (2017). L1 French learning of L2 Spanish past tenses: L1 transfer versus aspect and interface issues. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 489–515. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) (2014). The Language Educator, 9(5), 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ammar, A., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2010). Awareness of L1/L2 differences: Does it matter? Language Awareness, 19(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1080/09658411003746612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. W. (1984). The one to one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34(4), 77–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the Passé Composé and Imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 226–243. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoun, D. (2013). The second language acquisition of French tense, aspect, mood and modality. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bartning, I. (2009). The advanced learner variety: Ten years later. In E. Labeau & F. Myles (Eds.), The advanced learner varieties: The case of French (pp. 11–40). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195–221. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197002040
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164–194. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4), 553–580. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 277–305. doi: 10.1017/S0272263108080467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied ­Linguistics, 10(3), 331–360.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, L.-F. (1995). L’essentiel de la grammaire française. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, M., White, J., & Bell, P. (2010). First and second language knowledge in the language classroom. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(3), 331–349. doi: 10.1177/1367006910367848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. (2005). Les contextes prototypiques et marqués de l’emploi de l’imparfait par l’apprenant du français langue étrangère. In E. Labeau & P. Larrivée (Eds.), Nouveaux développements de l’imparfait (pp. 175–197). New York: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, J. (2014). Multimedia instruction in foreign language classrooms: Effects on the acquisition of the French perfective and imperfective distinction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 188–219. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.1697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, J., & Collins, L. (2008). The facilitative role of L1 influence in tense–aspect marking: A comparison of Hispanophone and Anglophone learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 350–368. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00751.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. N. (2007). The use and non‐use of semantic information, word order, and case markings during comprehension by L2 learners of German. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 418–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlstedt, M. (1998). La référence au passé dans le dialogue: Etude de l’acquisition de la temporalité chez des apprenants dits avancés de français. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Akademitryk.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstedt, M. (2015). Acquisition of the imparfait in L2 French in adults and children: The same or different? A comparative case study of Swedish adults and children in an immersion setting. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 6(1), 74–106.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, G. D., & Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research: A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupferberg, I. (1999). The cognitive turn of contrastive analysis: Empirical evidence. Language Awareness, 8(3–4), 210–222. doi: 10.1080/09658419908667130
   Google Scholar
• Kupferborg, I., & Olshtain, E. (1996). Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. Language Awareness, 5(3–4), 149–165. doi: 10.1080/09658416.1996.9959904
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., & Kim, H. Y. (2007). On crosslinguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean. Language Learning, 57(4), 651–685. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• L’Huillier, M. (1999). Advanced French grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y. (2009). A frequency dictionary of French: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S.M. (Eds.), Tasks and language learning. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–167). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Gass, S.M. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K. (2015). L1–L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(2), 51–77. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.2070.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K. (2013). Prototypical influence in second language acquisition: What now for the Aspect Hypothesis? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51(3), 299–322. doi: 10.1515/iral-2013-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019a). Signatures of automaticity during practice. Explicit instruction about L1 processing routines can improve L2 grammatical processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 205–234. doi: 10.1017/S0142716418000553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019b). Using explicit instruction about L1 to reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammar learning. Evidence from oral production in L2 French. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2018). Online and offline effects of L1 practice in L2 grammar learning. A partial replication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 459–475. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2017). L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 459–492. doi: 10.1017/S027226311600022X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, B., & Turnbull, M. (2009). Teachers’ use of the first language in French immersion: Revisiting a core principle. In Turnbull, M. & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (Eds.), First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp. 15–34). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. F., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships and language learning. New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Mifka-Profozic, N. (2015). Effects of corrective feedback on L2 acquisition of tense-aspect verbal morphology. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 6(1), 149–180.
   Google Scholar
• National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (2015). World‐readiness standards for learning languages. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: A “back-to-basics” approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 43–65). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. doi: 10.1111/lang.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polio, C. G., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 313–326. doi: 10.2307/330110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626. doi: 10.1111/lang.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P. (Ed.). (2015). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Roehr-Brackin, K. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salaberry, R. M. (2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. New York. NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C.A. & Slobin, D.I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2012). E-Prime 2.0: User’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & White, J. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. In Housen, A. & Pierrard, M. (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 199–234). New York: Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliamonte, S., & Lawrence, H. (2000). “I Used to Dance, but I Don’t Dance Now” The habitual past in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 28(4), 324–353. doi: 10.1177/007542420002800402
   Google Scholar
• Tolentino, L. C., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Cross‐language similarity modulates effectiveness of second language grammar instruction. Language Learning, 64(2), 279–309. doi: 10.1111/lang.12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. (2012a). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. (2012b). Spatial language, polysemy, and cross-linguistic semantic mismatches: Cognitive linguistics insights into challenges for second language learners. Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(4), 305–335. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2012.698670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Tyler, A., Ortega, L., Uno, M., & Park, H. I. (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. Amsterdam, Netherlans: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. (2015). Foundations of processing instruction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53(2), 91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanek, N., & Hendriks, H. (2015). Convergence of temporal reference frames in sequential bilinguals: Event structuring unique to second language users. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 753–768. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The instructed learning of form–function mappings in the English article system. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 99–119. doi: 10.1111/modl.12449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar