Metalinguistic terms, teacher feedback, and learner uptake in ESL classrooms

References

• Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667042
   Google Scholar
• Berman, R. (1979). Rule of grammar or rule of thumb? IRAL, 17(4), 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (1998). Talking about grammar in the foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 7(4), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667107
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: A quality study of teachers’ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callow, J., & Buch, B. (2020). Making meaning using a metalanguage: Grammar and international curricula. The Reading Teacher, 73(5), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., & Li, S. (2012). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a child ESOL classroom. RELC Journal, 43(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212463274
   Google Scholar
• Corder, S. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Daffern, T. (2017). What happens when a teacher uses metalanguage to teach spelling?The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51(2), 281–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, F., & Behnam, B. (2014). A study of corrective feedback and learner’s uptake in classroom interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(4), 204–212.
   Google Scholar
• Faech, C. (1985). Meta talk in FL classroom discourse. SSLA, 7, 184–199.
   Google Scholar
• Forey, G. (2020). A whole school approach to SFL metalanguage and the explicit teaching of language for curriculum learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, T., & Nassaji, H. (2016). Corrective feedback, learner uptake, and feedback perception in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., Chen, I., & Britton, L. (2014). “Miss, nominalization is a nominalization:” English language learners’ use of SFL metalanguage and their literacy practices. Linguistics and Education, 26, 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami, L., & Gholami, J. (2020). Uptake in incidental focus-on-form episodes concerning formulaic language in advanced adult EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 24(2), 189–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, X. (2016). Analyzed knowledge, metalanguage, and second language proficiency. System, 60, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliwell, S. (1993). Grammar matters. CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Hardman, W., & Bell, H. (2019). “More fronted adverbials than ever before”. Writing feedback practices and grammatical metalanguage in an English primary school. Language and Education, 33(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1488864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harun, H., Abdullah, N., Wahab, N., & Zainuddin, N. (2017). The use of metalanguage among second language learners to mediate L2 grammar learning. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14 (2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G. (2010). Revisiting the role of metalanguage in L2 teaching and learning. EA Journal, 26(1), 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nassaji, H. (2018). Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 698–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817699642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lado, B., Bowden, H., Stafford, C., & Sanz, C. (2014). A fine-grained analysis of the effects of negative evidence with and without metalinguistic information in language development. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2014). The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target. Language Teaching Research, 18(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., & Lyster, R. (2014). The influence of context on patterns of corrective feedback and learner uptake: A comparison of CLIL and immersion classrooms. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889509
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-based ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54(1), 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. SSLA, 27, 361–386.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Milla, R., & Garcia Mayo, M. P. (2014). Corrective feedback episodes in oral interaction: A comparison of a CLIL and an ESL classroom. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/14/1/151841
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A. (1996). Informal pedagogical grammar. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 34(4), 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2011). Explaining how language works: Is there a place for terminology?Literacy Today, 67, 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payant, C., & Kim, Y. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1292999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D., Cimasko, T., & Yi, Y. (2020). Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirani, R. (2019). Patterns of uptake and repair following recasts and prompts in an EFL context: Does feedback explicitness play a role? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(4), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, C., Bowden, H., & Sanz, C. (2012). Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning, 62, 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00648.x
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B., & Benati, A. (2010). Key terms in second language acquisition. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2015). Factors affecting learners’ attention to teacher talk in nine ESL classrooms. TESL-EJ, 19(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in communicative EFL classrooms. Xiamen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Myhill, D. (2012). Ways with words: Teachers’ personal epistemologies of the role of metalanguage in the teaching of poetry writing. Language and Education, 26(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.669768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The instructed learning of form-function mappings in the English article system. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar