Metatalk and metalinguistic knowledge: the interplay of procedural and declarative knowledge in the classroom discourse of first-language grammar teaching

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H. (2016). Teacher knowledge and beliefs about grammar: A case study of an English primary school. English in Education, 50(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R. (1997). Teachers’ awareness of learners’ knowledge: The case of metalinguistic terminology. Language Awareness, 6(2-3), 136–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1997.9959923
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. (2005). Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668817
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P. (2015). Relations between teacher questioning and student talk in one elementary ELL classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3), 370–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X16632451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camps, A., & Milian, M. (Eds.) (1999). Metalinguistic activity in learning to write. Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (Ed.) (1990). Knowledge about language and the curriculum: The LINC reader. Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Jones, P. (2013). Understanding metalinguistic development in beginning writers: A functional perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 9(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v9i1.81
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Myhill, D. (2016). Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguistics and Education, 35, 100–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppen, P. A. J. M., van Rijt, J. H. M., Wijnands, A., & Dielemans, R. C. (2019). Educational research on grammar education in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal-en Letterkunde, 135, 85–99. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culioli, A. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation: Opérations et représentations (Vol. 1). Editions Ophrys.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). (2013). English programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2 National curriculum in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335186/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_220714.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fontich, X. (2014). Grammar and language reflection at school: Checking out the whats and the hows of grammar instruction. In T. Ribas, X. Fontich, & O. Guasch (Eds.), Grammar at school: Research on metalinguistic activity in language education (pp. 255–284). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fontich, X. (2016). L1 grammar instruction and writing: Metalinguistic activity as a teaching and research focus. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(5), 238–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontich, X., & Camps, A. (2014). Towards a rationale for research into grammar teaching in schools. Research Papers in Education, 29(5), 598–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.813579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, E. P., Stude, J., & Uccelli, P. (2015). Adolescents’ metalinguistic reflections on the academic register in speech and writing. Linguistics and Education, 31, 221–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, C., & Kolln, M. (2010). Blowin’in the wind: English grammar in United States schools. In T. Locke (Ed.), Beyond the grammar wars (pp. 31–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J. (2017). Affronted adverbials: The debate on grammar. Teaching English, (13), 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 462–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Explaining phenomena of first and second language acquisition with the constructs of implicit and explicit learning. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 25–46). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H., & De Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. Aila Review, 11, 97–112. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.428191
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. Y., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kolln, M. J., & Gray, L. S. (2016). Rhetorical grammar: Grammatical choices, rhetorical effects (8th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Jesson, R., Fontich, X., & Myhill, D. (2016). Creating dialogic spaces: Talk as a mediational tool in becoming a writer. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 155–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. T., & Chen, H. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge about language: Issues of pedagogy and expertise. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(2), 147–172. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/1224
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K., & Sandiford, C. (2016). Teachers’ and students’ meta-reflections on writing choices: An Australian case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 204–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. (2012). Why school English needs a ‘good enough’grammatics (and not more grammar). Changing English, 19(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2012.680760
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M., Sandiford, C., Love, K., & Unsworth, L. (2015). New ways of working ‘with grammar in mind’ in School English: Insights from systemic functional grammatics. Linguistics and Education, 31, 145–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., & Horarik, S. (2018). Rethinking grammar in language arts: Insights from an Australian survey of teachers’ subject knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(3), 288–316. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/rethinking-grammar-language-arts-insights/docview/2007454310/se-2?accountid=10792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A socio-cultural approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2000). Misconceptions and difficulties in the acquisition of metalinguistic knowledge. Language and Education, 14(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780008666787
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2005). Ways of knowing: Writing with grammar in mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 77–96. http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/2005v4n3art5.pd
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2011). The ordeal of deliberate choice: Metalinguistic development in secondary writers. In V. Berninger (Ed.) Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 247–274). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2018). Grammar as a meaning-making resource for improving writing. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.04.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2019). Linguistic choice as empowerment: Teaching rhetorical decision-making in writing. Utbildning & Demokrati – Tidskrift för Didaktik och Utbildningspolitk, 28(2), 55–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48059/uod.v28i2.1121
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Wilson, A. (2016). Writing conversations: Fostering metalinguistic discussion about writing. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1106694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. A., Jones, S. M., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, R., & Watson, A. (2020). Shaping spaces: Teachers’ orchestration of metatalk about written text. Linguistics and Education, 60, 100860. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safford, K. (2016). Teaching grammar and testing grammar in the English primary school: The impact on teachers and their teaching of the grammar element of the statutory test in spelling, punctuation and grammar (SPaG). Changing English, 23(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2015.1133766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The meaning in grammar. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonne, I. O., & Sakshaug, L. (2007). Grammar and developing writing skills – What does the British EPPI Review Study tell us? In S. Matre & T. L. Hoel (Eds.), Skrive for nåtid og framtid. Skriving i arbeidsliv og skole (pp. 167–179). Tapir Akademisk Forlag. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-54138
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141–178). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. M. (2015a). Conceptualisations of ‘grammar teaching’: L1 English teachers’ beliefs about teaching grammar for writing. Language Awareness, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.828736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (2015b). The problem of grammar teaching: A case study of the relationship between a teacher’s beliefs and pedagogical practice. Language and Education, 29(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1016955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. M., & Newman, R. M. C. (2017). Talking grammatically: L1 adolescent metalinguistic reflection on writing. Language Awareness, 26(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. E., Hoy, A. W., Hughes, M., & Walkup, V. (2008). Psychology in education. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., & Torgerson, C. (2017). Experimental trials and ‘what works?’in education: The case of grammar for writing. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1019–1047. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar