Contextualizing feedback in L2 writing: the role of teacher scaffolding

References

• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, M. S., & Evans, N. W. (2013). Principles and practices for response in second language writing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2007). Argumentation, critical thinking and the postgraduate dissertation. Educational Review, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600796777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., & Philp, J. (2018). The role of collaborative tasks and peer interaction in the development of second language awareness. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 290–306). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisk, M. E., Kaveh, Y. M., Scialoia, P., & Timothy, B. (2016). Writing arguments: The experience of two mainstream teachers working with multilingual students. In C. P. Proctor, A. Boardman, & E. H. Hiebert (Eds.), Teaching emergent bilingual students: Flexible approaches in an era of new standards (pp. 138–156). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, L., Swain, M., Lapkin, S., & Knouzi, I. (2010). Mediating between scientific and spontaneous concepts through languaging. Language Awareness, 19(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903440755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanave, C. P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Research, designing and conducting mixed methods reserach. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davin, K. J., Herazo, J. D., & Sagre, A. (2017). Learning to mediate: Teacher appropriation of dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019). Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective?Language Awareness, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 185–205). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. M. (2016). Making use of teacher written feedback. In R. M. Manchón, Matsuda, & P. Kei (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2000). An introduction to functional grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, M. (2013). Examining the effect of written languaging: The role of metanotes as a mediator of second language learning. Language Awareness, 22(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.683435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C. (1999). Language awareness: Implications for the language curriculum. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 12(1), 94–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908319908666571
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentative competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688209
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1997). Language awareness and the autonomous language learner. Language Awareness, 6(2–3), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1997.9959920
   Google Scholar
• Lv, Y. (2019). Investigating EFL learners’ engagement with written corrective feedback: The constructs and influencing factors. Master of Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, W. (2018). Role reversals: A case study of dialogic interactions and feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2015). ZPD-activated languaging and collaborative L2 writing. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2019). Collaborative output: A review of theory and research. In M. Haneda & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Perspectives on language as action (pp. 119–133). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., Turner, J. C., & Meyer, D. K. (2006). Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 327–348). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (2009). Texts in contexts: Theorizing learning by looking at genre and activity. In R. Edwards & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks (pp. 17–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Centre For Language Studies International Conference. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. Chan (Ed.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (Studies in second and foreign language education (pp. 6). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00007-7
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–115). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–8). John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y. (2019). The role of languaging in collaborative and individual writing: When pairs outperform individuals. In M. Haneda & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Perspectives on language as action (pp. 63–80). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Weissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 246–265). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werani, A. (2018). Inner speech and its impact on teaching and learning. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 136–152). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–99). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. (2016). Languaging in story rewriting tasks by Chinese EFL students. Language Awareness, 25(3), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1197230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 464–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar