Educating L2 learners about collaborative writing: exploring the relationship between knowledge of collaborative writing and writing products

References

• Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2009). Collaborative writing in wikis: Insights from a culture project in a German class. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 115–144). CALICO.
   Google Scholar
• Arslanyilmaz, A., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Improving language production using subtitled similar task videos. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp.77–165). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Hapgood, S. (2021). Understanding knowledge, participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A metacognitive theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 256–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019a). Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: Student beliefs and perceptions. Language Awareness, 28(4), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1675680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019b). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Guerrero, M. C. G., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14, 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Dobao, A. (2014). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 158–187. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90006-B
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, L. F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitive growth of ESL student writers. TESL-EJ, 3, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pre-task modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Dean, D.Jr.(2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGroarty, M. E., & Zhu, W. (1997). Triangulation in classroom research: A study of peer revision. Language Learning, 47(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.11997001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816641703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, H., & McDonough, K. (2014). Exploring the relationships among student preferences, prewriting tasks, and text quality in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, W. (2014). A Longitudinal Investigation into L2 Learners’ Cognitive Processes during Study Abroad. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Metacognition in learning and instruction. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehadeh, L. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99–118). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, F., & Huang, J. (2019). Predictive effects of writing strategies for self-regulated learning on secondary school learners’ EFL writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (1993). Strategic interaction and task knowledge. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–101). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Liu, T., & Lee, C. (2021). Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar