Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: an eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study

References

• Bax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212473244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax, S., & Weir, C. (2012). Investigating learners’ cognitive reading processes during a computer-based CAE reading test. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations Research Notes, 47, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012857
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Durik, A. M. (2017). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brunfaut, T., & McCray, G. (2015). Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processes whilst completing reading tasks: a mixed-method eye-tracking and stimulated recall study. ARAGs Research Reports Online, AR/2015/001. British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727–752. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K. (2016). When language comprehension goes wrong for the right reasons: Good-enough, underspecified, or shallow language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 69(5), 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1134603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., & Ferreira, F. (2010). Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 538–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2014). Pauses in spontaneous written communication: A keystroke logging study. Journal of Writing Research, 6(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.01.3
   Google Scholar
• Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., Feng, H.-H., Saricaoglu, A., & Torrance, M. (2019). Combined deployable keystroke logging and eyetracking for investigating cognitive processes that underlie L2 writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 583–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900007X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-tracking: A guide for applied linguistics research. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M., & Criado-Sánchez, R. (2012). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 323–331). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dirix, N., Vander Beken, H., De Bruyne, E., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2020). Reading text when studying in a second language: An eye-tracking study. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egi, T. (2008). Investigating stimulated recall as a cognitive measure: Reactivity and verbal reports in SLA research methodology. Language Awareness, 17(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A. (2019). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 223–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (2013). Task-induced strategic processing in L2 text comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 98–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4003_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007). Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1323–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J., & Révész, A. (2018). The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Jung, J. (2021). Effects of textual enhancement and task manipulation on L2 learners’ attentional processes and grammatical knowledge development: A mixed methods study. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211034640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication, 30(3), 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, J., Moreno, J. D., Escudero, I., Olmos, R., Ruiz, M., & Lorch, R. F. Jr., (2019). Specific relevance instructions promote selective reading strategies: Evidences from eye tracking and oral summaries. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P., Grey, S., Marijuan, S., & Moorman, C. (2014). Concurrent data elicitation procedures, processes, and the early stages of L2 learning: A critical overview. Second Language Research, 30(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313511979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 778–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, 48(2), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638531003694561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G. (2005). The effect of relevance instructions on reading time and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., Feng, D. G., Sabatini, D. J., Wang, D. Z., & Gorin, D. J. (2018). How do people read the passages during a reading comprehension test? The effect of reading purpose on text processing behavior. Educational Assessment, 23(4), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2018.1513787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, C., & Atkins, A. (2019). Selective attention of L2 learners in task-based reading online. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(2), 269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72(6), 675–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, G. E., Campbell, S. J., & Bovee, J. C. (2014). Using eye movements to evaluate the cognitive processes involved in text comprehension. Journal of Visual Experimentation, 83, e50780.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviors: A mixed-methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900024X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelman Miller, K., Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2008). The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillefer, G. E. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insight into the short-circuit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Development of reading comprehension. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of Reading Development (pp. 283–306). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects of questioning on narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: a modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, F. (2006). Does manipulating foreknowledge of output tasks lead to differences in reading behavior, text comprehension and noticing of language form? Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr204oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenotz, V. (2012). Awareness development for online reading. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar