Explicit embodiment of narrative worlds: a case study of student-teacher concept-led grammar conferencing for writing

References

• Anderson, C. (2000). How’s it going?: A practical guide to conferring with student writers. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A. (2012). Teaching writing through teacher-student writing conferences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.229
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. (2002). Research report: Better writers: Writing center tutoring and the revision of rough drafts. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2002.10850133
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H., & Ainsworth, S. (2021). Difficulties assessing knowledge of grammatical terminology implications for teacher education and teaching. Language Awareness, 30(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1752701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. (2005). Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668817
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, L. (2003). See me: Conference strategies for developmental writers. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 30(4), 391–402.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. (2014). The Rise of Writing: Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. (1983). Writing and the story of the world. In B. Kroll & C. Wells (Eds.), Explorations in the development of writing: Theory, research, and practice. (pp. 3–30). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. (2010). Why care about pedagogical stylistics? Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 19(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009356805
   Google Scholar
• Cajkler, W., & Hislam, J. (2002). Trainee teachers’ grammatical knowledge: The tension between expectations and individual competence. Language Awareness, 11(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667054
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (2007). Literature and language teaching 1986-2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00130.x
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (2010). Issues in pedagogical stylistics. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 19(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009356715
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Myhill, D. (2016). Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguistics and Education, 35, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, U., & Zyngier, S. (2003). Towards a pedagogical stylistics. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 12(4), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470030124003
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, I. (2018a). Stylistics goes to school. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 27(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018794093
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, I. (2018b). Suddenly, I am part of the poem’: texts as worlds, reader-response and grammar in teaching poetry. English in Education, 52(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2018.1414398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, I. (2021). Re-contextualising cognitive grammar for school teaching. In M. Giovanelli, C. Harrison, & L. Nuttall (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Grammar and Style. (pp. 241–259). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, L., & Capelli, R. (2007). Mentor texts: Teaching writing through children’s literature, K-6. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eickholdt, L. (2004). Scaffolding in the writing workshop. Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Fontich, X., & Camps, A. (2014). Towards a rationale for research into grammar teaching in schools. Research Papers in Education, 29(5), 598–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.813579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M. (2010). Pedagogical stylistics: A text world theory approach to the teaching of poetry. English in Education, 44(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01074.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M. (2014). Teaching grammar structure and meaning: Exploring theory and practice for post-16 English language teachers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M. (2016). Text world theory as cognitive grammatics: A pedagogical application in the secondary classroom. In J. Gavins & E. Lahey (Eds.), World building: Discourse in the mind. (pp. 109–126). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Giovanelli, M., & Harrison, C. (2018). Cognitive grammar in stylistics: A practical guide. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2018). The writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers & children at work. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. (2014). Pedagogical stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. (pp. 237–267). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. (3rd ed.). Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hardinge, F. (2011). Twilight Robbery. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, B., & Gardner, P. (2021). Writing, grammar and the body: A cognitive stylistics framework for teaching upper primary narrative writing. Literacy, 55(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. (2006). Synchronous online conference-based instruction: A study of whiteboard interactions and student writing. Computers and Composition, 23(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, T. S., Feng, L., Kuo, L.-J., & McTigue, E. (2016). Discovering the literacy gap: A systematic review of reading and writing theories in research. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1228284. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1228284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keebler, R. (1995). So, there are some things I don’t quite understand…”: An analysis of writing conferences in a culturally diverse second grade classroom. Tufts University.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S. (1965). Internal and external deviation in poetry. WORD, 21(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1965.11435425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, L. (1993). The Giver. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrew, D., & Reigstad, T. (2001). Tutoring writing: A practical guide for conferences. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, D. (2011). The place of stylistics in the English curriculum. In L. Jeffries & D. McIntyre (Eds.), Teaching Stylistics. (pp. 9–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McIver, M., & Wolf, S. (1999). The power of the conference is the power of suggestion. Language Arts, 77(1), 54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Morpurgo, M. (1985). Why the Whales came. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. (1979). The listening eye: Reflections on the writing conference. College English, 41(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/376356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. (1985). A writer teaches writing. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2003). Principled understanding? Teaching the active and passive voice. Language and Education, 17(5), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666856
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2012). The ordeal of deliberate choice: Metalinguistic development in secondary writers. In V. W. Berniger (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 247–274). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2018). Grammar as a meaning-making resource for language development. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(3), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2020). Wordsmiths and sentence-shapers: Linguistic and metalinguistic development in secondary writers. In H. Lewis, D. Myhill, & H. Chen (Eds.), Developing writers across the primary and secondary years: Growing into writing. (pp. 194–211). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2021). Grammar reimagined foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education, 55(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1885975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Cremin, T., & Oliver, L. (2021). Writing as a craft: Reconsidering teacher subject content knowledge for teaching writing. Research Papers in Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1977376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Lines, H. (2018). Supporting less-proficient writers through linguistically-aware teaching. Language and Education, 32(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1438468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 72(2), 139–166.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Watson, A. (2013). Grammar matters: How teachers’ grammatical knowledge impacts on the teaching of writing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Wilson, A. (2016). Writing conversations: Fostering metalinguistic discussion about writing. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1106694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Jones, S. (2018). Texts that teach: Examining the efficacy of using texts as ­models. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(2), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Watson, A. (2012). Making meaning with grammar: A repertoire of possibilities. English in Australia, 47(3), 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., & Newman, R. (2016). Metatalk: Enabling metalinguistic discussion about writing. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Newman, R., & Watson, A. (2020). Going meta: Dialogic talk in the writing classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43(1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, P. (2011). A Monster Calls. Walker Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sands, K. (2015). The Blackthorn Key. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. (2007). At last: The Meaning in Grammar. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2013). Creative Writing: A stylistics approach. In M. Burke, S. Csabi, L. Week, & J. Zerkowitz (Eds.), Pedagogical stylistics: Current trends in language, literature and ELT. Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2016). Worlds from Words: Theories of World-building as Creative Writing Toolbox. In J. Gavins & E. Lahey (Eds.), World Building: Discourse in the Mind. (pp. 127–145). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2018). Cognitive poetics and creative practice: Beginning the conversation. New Writing, 15(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2017.1376800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, M. (1999). How we write: Writing as creative design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, P. (2020). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1978). Figure and Ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & J. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language. (Vol. 4, pp. 625–649). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000). Towards a cognitive semantics, Vol 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolkien, J. R. R. (2002). The lord of the rings. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language learning. Language Awareness, 7(2-3), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667105
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Newman, R. (2017). Talking grammatically: L1 adolescent metalinguistic reflection on writing. Language Awareness, 26(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Newman, R., & Morgan, S. (2021). Metatalk and metalinguistic knowledge the interplay of procedural and declarative knowledge in the classroom discourse of first language grammar teaching. Language Awareness, 30(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1905655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnands, A., van Rijt, J., & Coppen, P. (2021). Learning to think about language step by step: a pedagogical template for the development of cognitive and reflective thinking skills in L1 grammar. Language Awareness, 30(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1871911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D. (2006). Pupils’ word choices and the teaching of grammar. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500490965
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., & Miller, E. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conference. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar