851
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Investigating novice EFL writing teachers’ beliefs and practices concerning written corrective feedback across contexts: a case study from a complexity theory perspective

ORCID Icon
Pages 465-486 | Received 11 Jul 2021, Accepted 21 Aug 2022, Published online: 12 Sep 2022

References

  • Aragao, R. (2011). Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning. System, 39(3), 302–313.
  • Barcelos, A. M. F., & Kalaja, P. (2011). Editorial: Introduction to beliefs about SLA revisited. System, 37, 366–379.
  • Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
  • Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn043
  • Borg, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186
  • Borg, M. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.
  • Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury.
  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). Macmillan.
  • Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: Student beliefs and perceptions. Language Awareness, 28(4), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1675680
  • Clarke, A., & Collins, S. (2007). Complexity science and student teacher supervision. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.10.006
  • Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., & Aitken, G. (2014). The challenge and promise of complexity theory for teacher education research. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 116(4), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600407
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing from five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2005). Complexity science and educational action research: Toward a pragmatics of transformation. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200291
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modeling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000516
  • Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587901
  • Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353–371.
  • Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
  • Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
  • Ferris, D. R. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004
  • Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307–329.
  • Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes How Explicit Does It Need to Be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184.
  • Guénette, D., & Lyster, R. (2013). Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre- service ESL teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1346
  • Haggis, T. (2008). ‘Knowledge must be contextual’: Some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theories for educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00403.x
  • Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 69, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003
  • Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003
  • Hyland, F. (2003). Focus on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
  • Izadinia, M. (2014). Teacher educators’ identity: A review of literature. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.947025
  • Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard”: A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
  • Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
  • Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
  • Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written corrective feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn010
  • Lee, I. (2010). Writing teacher education and teacher learning: Testimonies of four EFL teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.05.001
  • Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
  • Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
  • Maos, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 1–25.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Min, H. T. (2013). A case study of an EFL writing teacher’s belief and practice about written feedback. System, 41(3), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.018
  • Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.04.002
  • Robb, T., Ross. S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83–93.
  • Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguisitic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286–306.
  • Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x
  • Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond and basics. System, 27(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
  • Yang, L., & Gao, S. (2013). Beliefs and practices of Chinese university teachers in EFL writing instruction. Language Culture and Curriculum, 26(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2013.794817
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2014). ‘ Pre-service teachers’ changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, 44(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.02.002
  • Yuan, R., Zhang, J., & Yu, S. (2018). Understanding teacher collaboration processes from a complexity theory perspective: A case study of a Chinese secondary school. Teachers and Teaching, 24(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1447458
  • Zheng, H. (2015). Teacher beliefs as a complex system: English language teachers in China. Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.