Qatari student writers’ metalinguistic understanding of transitions in L2 English written argument

References

• Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215
   Google Scholar
• Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24
   Google Scholar
• Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.218
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A., Zhang, X., Rezk, L., & Zaghouani, W. (2024). Building an annotated L1 Arabic/L2 English bilingual writer corpus: The Qatari corpus of argumentative writing (QCAW). Corpus-Based Studies across Humanities, 1(1), 183–215. https://doi.org/10.1515/csh-2023-0012
   Google Scholar
• Alharbi, S. H. (2021). An investigation of metadiscourse features in applied linguistics academic research articles and master’s dissertations. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.1.p.46
   Google Scholar
• Appel, R., & Szeib, A. (2018). Linking adverbials in L2 English academic writing: L1-related differences. System, 78, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, R. (2020). A contrastive interlanguage analysis of linking adverbials in EFL writing: Identifying L1 related differences. Learner Corpus Studies in Asia and the World, 4, 24–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ashofteh, Z., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 16(4), 2077–2096. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851035
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burneikaitė, N. (2008). Metadiscourse in linguistics master’s theses in English L1 and L2. Kalbotyra, 59(3), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2008.7591
   Google Scholar
• Cao, F., & Hu, G. (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d). DOCUSCOPETM. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/english/research-and-publications/docuscope.html
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1976). Play with language and meta-linguistic awareness: One dimension of language experience. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 603–608). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., & Han, C. (2018). Transitions of contrast in Chinese and English university student writing. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 861–882. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0067
   Google Scholar
• Garner, J. R. (2013). The use of linking adverbials in academic essays by non-native writers: How data-driven learning can help. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.410-422
   Google Scholar
• Gombert, E. J. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalves, L. (2021). Development and demonstration of metalinguistic awareness in adult ESL ­learners with emergent literacy. Language Awareness, 30(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1776721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). In this paper we suggest “Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2022). Metadiscourse choices in EAP: An intra-journal study of JEAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, 101165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., Wang, W., & Jiang, F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265, 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., Myhill, D. A., & Bailey, T. C. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation into the effect of contextualised grammar teaching on student writing. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9416-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Sims, K., Jones, M. C., & Cuckle, P. (1996). Rethinking metalinguistic awareness: Representing and accessing knowledge about what counts as a word. Cognition, 58(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00680-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, Z. (2016). Using corpus results to guide the discourse-based interview: A case study of a student writer’s awareness of stance in philosophical argumentation. Journal of Writing Research, 8(1), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Leedham, M., & Cai, G. (2013). Besides … on the other hand: Using a corpus approach to explore the influence of teaching materials on Chinese students’ use of linking adverbials. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. (2009). Bringing writers’ voices to writing research: Talk around texts. In A. Carter, T. Lillis, & S. Parkin (Eds.), Why writing matters: Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy (pp. 169–187). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.12.24lil
   Google Scholar
• Liu, D. (2008). Linking adverbials: An across-register corpus study and its implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 491–518. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.05liu
   Google Scholar
• Malakoff, M. (1992). Translation ability: A natural bilingual and metalinguistic skill. Advances in Psychology, 83, 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61514-9
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for specific Purposes, 12(1), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J., & Tsang, E. S. (1993). A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research. In Studies in Lexis (pp. 215–246). http://repository.ust.hk/ir/bitstream/1783.1-1083/2/studies04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Lines, H., & Jones, S. (2020a). Writing like a reader: Developing metalinguistic understanding to support reading-writing connections. In Alves R., Limpo T., & Joshi R. (Eds.), Reading-writing connections (vol. 19, pp. 107–122). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_7
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2016). Writing conversations: Metalinguistic talk about writing. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliqué, 103, 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. (2019). Linguistic choice as empowerment: Teaching rhetorical decision-making in writing. Utbildning & Demokrati – Tidskrift För Didaktik Och Utbildningspolitk, 28(2), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.48059/uod.v28i2.1121
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Ahmed, A., & Abdollazadeh, E. (2023a). Going meta: Bringing together an understanding of metadiscourse with students’ metalinguistic understanding. Language Teaching, 56(1), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Ahmed, A., & Rezk, L. (2023b). Engaging with readers: Students’ metalinguistic understanding of the use of pronouns in building reader-writer relationships. Linguistics and Education, 75, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Newman, R., & Watson, A. (2020c). Going meta: Dialogic talk in the writing classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 43(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., Watson, A., & Newman, R. (2020b). Thinking differently about grammar and metalinguistic understanding in writing. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 13(2), e870. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.870
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. A., Lines, H., & Jones, S. M. (2018). Texts that teach: Examining the efficacy of using texts as models. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(Running Issue), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.03.07
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R., & Watson, A. (2020). Shaping spaces: Teachers’ orchestration of metatalk about written text. Linguistics and Education, 60, 100860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, N., & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.011
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. A., & El Euch, S. (2015). La conscience métalinguistique. Théorie, développement et instruments de mesure. Les Presses de l‘Université de Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(s1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
   Google Scholar
• Sealey, A., & Thompson, P. (2007). Corpus, concordance, classification: Young learners in the L1 classroom. Language Awareness, 16(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.2167/la453.0
   Google Scholar
• Serrano, R. (2011). From metalinguistic instruction to metalinguistic knowledge, and from metalinguistic knowledge to performance in error correction and oral production tasks. Language Awareness, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.529911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, P. (2009). Linking adverbials in student and professional writing in literary studies: What makes writing mature. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari, & S. Hunston (Eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse (pp. 215–235). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tapper, M. (2005). Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners’ written English: Preliminary results. In F. Heinat & E. Klingvall (Eds.), Working papers in linguistics (pp. 115–144). http://www.sol.lu.se/fileadmin/media/forskning/workingpapers/engelska/vol05/Tapper-wp-05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vande Kopple, W. J. (2012). The importance of studying metadiscourse. Applied Research in English, 1(2), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Walková, M. (2020). Transition markers in EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. M., & Newman, R. M. C. (2017). Talking grammatically: L1 adolescent metalinguistic reflection on writing. Language Awareness, 26(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1410554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. M., Newman, R. M. C., & Morgan, S. D. (2021). Metatalk and metalinguistic knowledge: The interplay of procedural and declarative knowledge in the classroom discourse of first-language grammar teaching. Language Awareness, 30(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1905655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, S. W. (2020). Establishing a three-dimension model of metadiscourse taxonomy based on global virtual team’s internal communication. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08(12), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812032
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, M. K., Malik, F., Rashid, R., Pilus, Z., & Zakaria, N. S. (2018). Metadiscourse in the academic writing of local and international students at a University in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.227.238
   Google Scholar