Gender mainstreaming and the Common Agricultural Policy

References

• BenschopY., and M.Verloo. 2006. “Sisyphus' Sisters: Can Gender Mainstreaming Escape the Genderedness of Organisations?” Journal of Gender Studies15 (1): 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BockB. B.1994. “Women and the Future of Umbrian Family Farms.” In Women in Family Farms, edited by M.van der Burg and M.Endeveld, 83–89. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Circle for Rural European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• BockB. B.2004. “Fitting in and Multi-tasking: Dutch Farm Women's Strategies in Rural Entrepreneurship.” Sociologia Ruralis44 (3): 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BockB. B.2010. “Personal and Social Development of Women in Rural Areas of Europe.” IP/B/AGRI/IC/2010_089, European Parliament, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• BockB. B.2014. “Gender Mainstreaming in Rural Development: The Trivialisation of Rural Gender Issues.” Gender, Place and Culture. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879105.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, B. B., and S.Shortall, eds. 2006. Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• BohakZ., A.Borec, and J.Turk. 2010. “An Appraisal of Family Farm Succession Studies: A Review.” Agricultura7 (1): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• BrandthB.2002. “Gender Identity in European Family Farming: A Literature Review.” Sociologia Ruralis42 (3): 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrandthB., and M. S.Haugen. 2010. “Doing Farm Tourism: The Intertwining Practices of Gender and Work.” Signs35 (2): 425–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantL., and B.Pini. 2011. Gender and Rurality. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CartwrightA., and N.Swain. 2003. “Finding Farming Households in Eastern Europe.” Working Paper no. 53. Rural Transition Series. Centre for Central and Eastern European Studies, University of Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Cernic IstenicM.2006. “Farm Women in Slovenia.” In Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies, edited by B. B.Bock and S.Shortall, 63–96. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Cernic IstenicM.2014. “Whether Rural Development Programmes Promote Gender Equality on Farms? The Case of Slovenia.” Gender, Place and Culture. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879102.
   Google Scholar
• COPA. 2009. Innovation Prize for Women Farmers. Brussels: COPA.
   Google Scholar
• CopusA., C.Hall, A.Barnes, H.Dalton, P.Cook, P.Weingarten, S.Baum, H.Stange, C.Lindner, A.Hill, G.Eiden, R.McQaid, M.Grief, and M.Johansson. 2006. Study on Employment in Rural Areas (SERA), Final Deliverable. Brussels: DG Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• “Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).”Official Journal of the European Union, October 21, 2005, L 277/1.
   Google Scholar
• DalyM.2005. “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics12 (3): 433–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElgstromO.2000. “Norm Negotiations. The Construction of New Norms Regarding Gender and Development in EU Foreign Aid Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy7 (3): 457–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. Equal Opportunities for Women and Men in the European Union Annual Report 1999. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2008. Report on the Situation of Women in Rural Areas of the EU (2007/2117(INI)), Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality, rapporteur: Christa Klaβ.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2009. Agricultural Statistics. Main Results 2007–2008. Luxembourg: Official publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• GibbardR.1997. “The Relationship between the European Community Agriculture Structural Policies and Their Implementation and Agricultural Succession and Inheritance within Member States.” University of Reading Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• GiovarelliR., and J.Duncan. 1999. “Women and Land in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Paper presented at Women Farmers: Enhancing Rights and Productivity, Bonn, Germany, August 26–27, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• GlaubenT., H.Tietje, and C.Weiss. 2004. “Intergenerational Succession in Farm Households: Evidence from Upper Austria.” Review of Economics of the Household2: 443–461.
   Google Scholar
• GormanM.2006. “Gender Relations and Livelihood Strategies.” In Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies, edited by B. B.Bock and S.Shortall, 27–46. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• HolmlundS.2008. “From Formal to Female Property Rights: Gender and Inheritance of Landed Property in Estuna, Sweden, 1810–1845.” In Gender Regimes, Citizen Participation and Rural Restructuring, edited by I.Asztalos Morell and B. B.Bock, 239–260. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• HolznerBrigitte M.2008. “Agrarian Restructuring and Gender – Designing Family Farms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Gender, Place and Culture15 (4): 431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JackC., J.Moss, and M.Wallace. 2009. “‘Waiting for Godot’ – Restructuring on Small Family Farms.” Paper presented at the 111 EAAE-IAAE Seminar ‘Small Farms: Decline or Persistence’, University of Kent, Canterbury, June 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• KellyR., and S.Shortall. 2002. “‘Farmers’ Wives': Women Who Are Off-Farm Breadwinners & the Implications for On-Farm Gender Relations.” Journal of Sociology38 (4): 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MathijsE., and N.Noev. 2004. “Subsistence Farming in Central and Eastern Europe: Empirical Evidence from Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania.” Eastern European Economics42 (6): 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melberg. 2008. “Succession Patterns in Norwegian Farm Generations: Gender Responses to Modernity.” In Gender Regimes, Citizen Participation and Rural Restructuring, edited by I.Morell and B.Bock, 217–238. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• MeredithD.2010. “Recent Trends in Employment and Unemployment: Assessing the Impact of the Economic Downturn on Part-Time Farmers.” Rural Economy Research Centre Paper, Teagasc, Athenry, Galway, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• MomsemJ.2006. “Gender at the Border.” In Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies, edited by B. B.Bock and S.Shortall, 136–154. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Oedl-WieserT.2014. “Gender Equality – A Core Dimension in Rural Development Programmes in Austria?” Gender, Place and Culturehttps://doi.org/doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879103.
   Google Scholar
• PerronsD.2005. “Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality in the New (Market) Economy: An Analysis of Contradictions.” Social Politics12 (3): 389–411.
   Google Scholar
• PriceL., and N.Evans. 2006. “From ‘as Good as Gold’ to ‘Gold Diggers’: Farming Women and the Survival of British Family Farming.” Sociologia Ruralis46 (4): 280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrüglE.2010a. “Does Gender Mainstreaming Work?” International Feminist Journal of Politics11 (2): 174–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrüglE.2010b. “Feminism and the Postmodern State: Gender Mainstreaming in European Rural Development.” Signs35 (2): 447–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamosG.2005. “The Continuity of Family Agriculture and the Succession System: The Basque Case.” www.redorbit.com.
   Google Scholar
• ReesT.2005. “Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe International Feminist.” Journal of Politics7 (4): 555–574.
   Google Scholar
• Safilios-RothschildC.2006. “CAP Regulations and Farm Household Relations.” In Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies, edited by B. B.Bock and S.Shortall, 260–278. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• SchwarzU.2004. To Farm or Not to Farm: Gendered Paths to Succession and Inheritance. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS.1996. “Training to be Farmers or Wives? Agricultural Training for Women in Northern Ireland.” Sociologia Ruralis36 (3): 269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShortallS.1997. “Women, Farming and Access to the Land.” Irish Journal of Sociology7: 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS.1999. Gender and Power – Women and Farming. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS.2001. “Women in the Field: Women, Farming and Organisations.” Gender, Work and Organisation8 (2): 164–182.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS.2002. “Gendered Agricultural and Rural Restructuring: A Case Study of Northern Ireland.” Sociologia Ruralis42 (2): 160–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShortallS.2006. “Gender and Farming: An Overview.” In Rural Gender Relations: Issues and Case-Studies, edited by B. B.Bock and S.Shortall, 19–26. Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS.2010. “Women Working on the Farm: How to Promote Their Contribution to the Development of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Europe.” IP/B/AGRI/IC/2010_090, European Parliament, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• ShortallS., and R.Kelly. 2001. Gender Proofing CAP Reforms. Cookstown. The Rural Community Network NI.
   Google Scholar
• Shucksmith, M., K.Thomson, and D.Roberts, eds. 2005. CAP and the Regions: the Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. Oxfordshire: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• SwainN.1999. “Agricultural Restitution and Cooperative Transformation in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia.” Europe-Adia Studies51 (7): 1199–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VerlooM.2005. “Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Concept and Practice of the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality.” Social Politics12 (3): 344–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VroliijkH., C.de Bont, P.Blokland, and R.Soboh. 2010. Farm Viability in the European Union – Assessment of the Impact of Changes in Farm Payment. LEI Report 2010–11, Project code, 31964. The Hague: Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• WalbyS.2005. “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics12 (3): 321–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoodwardA.2008. “Too Late for Gender Mainstreaming? Taking Stock in Brussels.” Journal of European Social Policy18 (2): 289–3024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar