Intimacy and angst in the field

References

• Berlant, Lauren, ed. 2000. Intimacy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chacko, Elizabeth. 2004. “Positionality and Praxis: Fieldwork Experiences in Rural India.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 25 (1): 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, Roma, and Deepak Mehta. 2007. Living with Violence: An Anthropology of Events and Everyday Life. Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, Sutapa. 2012. “Getting Personal While Narrating the ‘Field’: A Researcher's Journey to the Villages of the Narmada Valley.” Gender, Place & Culture 20: 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, Ayona. 2008. “Spatialising Performance: Masculinities and Femininities in a ‘Fragmented’ Field.” Gender, Place and Culture 15 (2): 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, Simone, and Megan Warin. 2010. “Honeyed Tongues and Hostile Intimacy: Engaging Trauma across Migrant Worlds.” Emotion, Space and Society 3: 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Deborah P. 2014. “The Way of the Flesh: Life, Geopolitics and the Weight of the Future.” Gender, Place & Culture 12 (2): 136–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, Deborah P., and Sallie A. Marston. 2011. “Introduction: Feminist Engagements with Geopolitics.” Gender, Place & Culture 18 (4): 445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowler, Lorraine, and Joanne Sharp. 2001. “A Feminist Geopolitics?” Space & Polity 5: 165–176.
   Google Scholar
• England, Kim. 1994. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality and Feminist Research.” Professional Geographer 46: 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. London: Pandora Books.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, Clifton. 2010. “Intimacy, Sport and Young Refugee Men.” Emotion, Space and Society 3: 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Karen T. 2014. “Positionality, Subjectivity, and Race in Transnational and Transcultural Geographical Research.” Gender, Place & Culture. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879097.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, M., and E. Kofman. 2004. “Critically Feminist Geopolitics.” In Mapping Women, Making Politics, edited by L. Staeheli, E. Kofman, and L. Peake, 113–126. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hapke, Holly M., and Devan Ayyankeril. 2001. “Of ‘Loose’ Women and ‘Guides,’ or, Relationships in the Field.” Geographical Review 91 (1/2): 342–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J., ed. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women, 183–202. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Jennifer. 2001a. “Towards a Feminist Geopolitics.” The Canadian Geographer 45: 210–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Jennifer. 2001b. “The Field as Here and Now, Not There and Then.” Geographical Review 91 (1–2): 262–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Cindi. 2009. “Fieldwork.” In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by Derek Gregory, Ron Johnston, Geraldine Pratt, Michael Watts, and Sarah Whatmore, 250–252. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Audrey. 2003. “GPC Ten Years On: Is Self-Reflexivity Enough?” Gender, Place & Culture 10: 345–349.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, Stephen. 2010. “An Intimate and Imperial Feminism: Meliscent Shephard and the Regulation of Prostitution in Colonial India.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 68–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, Sallie A. 2002. “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24: 219–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mody, Perveez. 2008. The Intimate State: Love-Marriage and the Law in Delhi. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, edited by Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres, 51–80. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, Nicola. 2011. Rural Nostalgias and Transnational Dreams: Identity and Modernity among Jat Sikhs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, Alison, and Jennifer Hyndman. 2006. “Feminist Approaches to the Global Intimate.” Women's Studies Quarterly 34 (1/2): 446–463.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, Richa. 2002. “Footloose Researchers, ‘Traveling’ Theories, and the Politics of Transnational Feminist Praxis.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9: 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar Richa. 2003, in consultation with Farah Ali and Sangatin women's collective, “Collaboration across Borders: Moving beyond Positionality.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24: 356–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar, Richa, and Susan Geiger. 2007. “Reflexivity and Positionality in Feminist Fieldwork Revisited.” In Politics and Practice in Economic Geography, edited by A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, J. Peck, and T. Barnes, 267–278. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, Richa, Victoria Lawson, Linda McDowell, and Susan Hanson. 2002. “Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization.” Economic Geography 78 (3): 257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, K. 1993. “How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist?” American Anthropologist 95 (3): 671–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olund, Eric. 2010. “‘Disreputable Life’: Race, Sex, and Intimacy.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 142–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswin, Natalie, and Eric Olund. 2010. “Governing Intimacy.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28: 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2006. The Empire of Love: Toward a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Geraldine, and V. Rosner. 2006. “Introduction: The Global and the Intimate.” Women's Studies Quarterly 34: 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, Elspeth. 2010. “Introduction: Researching Intimate Spaces.” Emotion, Space and Society 3 (1): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Raghuram, Parvati, and Clare Madge. 2006. “Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography? Possibilities and Challenges.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27: 270–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, Saraswati. 2002. “We Are Different, but Can We Talk?” Gender, Place and Culture 9 (2): 173–177.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangtin Writers Collective and Richa Nagar. 2006. Playing with Fire: Feminist Thought and Activism through Seven Lives in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Joanne, and Lorraine Dowler. 2011. “Framing the Field.” In A Companion to Social Geography, edited by Vincent J. Del Casino Jr., Mary E. Thomas, Paul Cloke, and Ruth Panelli, 146–160. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Sara. 2012. “Intimate Geopolitics: Religion, Marriage, and Reproductive Bodies in Leh, Ladakh.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (6): 1511–1528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak? Speculations on Widow Sacrifice.” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson, and L. Grossberg, 271–313. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, Ann Laura. 1995. Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, Ann Laura. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, Juanita. 2003. “Masculinist Epistemologies and the Politics of Fieldwork in Latin Americanist Geography.” The Professional Geographer 55 (2): 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Jodie. 2011. “The Intimate Insider: Negotiating the Ethics of Friendship When Doing Insider Research.” Qualitative Research 11: 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, Gill. 2002. “People Like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process.” In Feminist Geography in Practice, edited by Pamela Moss, 116–126. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar