Rethinking the place of emotions in the field through social laboratories

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Warwick. 2002. “Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (5–6): 643–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Abhijit V., and Esther Duflo. 2011. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Katy. 2002. “Participant Observation.” In Doing Cultural Geography, edited by Pamela Shurmer-Smith, 139–144. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, Timothy. 2012. “Review Essay: Poor Choices – Poverty from the Ground Level.” Foreign Affairs, 160–167.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, Liz. 2003. “Empathy and Identification: Conceptual Resources for Feminist Fieldwork.” ACME: International Journal of Critical Geography 2 (1): 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, Liz. 2005. “The Place of Emotions in Research: From Partitioning Emotion and Reason to the Emotional Dynamics of Research Relationships.” In Emotional Geographies, edited by Joyce Davidson, Liz Bondi, and Mick Smith, 231–246. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 1991. “Body-Images and the Pornography of Representation.” Journal of Gender Studies 1: 137–151.
   Google Scholar
• Brännström, Mats, Liza Johannesson, Pernilla Dahm-Kähler, Anders Enskog, Johan Mölne, Niclas Kvarnström, Cesar Diaz-Garcia, et al. 2014. “First Clinical Uterus Transplantation Trial: A Six-Month Report.” Fertility and Sterility 101 (5): 1228–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, Kath. 2003. “Negotiations and Fieldworkings: Friendship and Feminist Research.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers 2 (1): 132–146.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, Sutapa. 2012. “Getting Personal while Narrating the ‘Field’: A Researcher's Journey to the Villages of the Narmada Valley.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 20 (2): 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, Julie. 2002. “The Field as a Landscape of Desire: Sex and Sexuality in Geographical Fieldwork.” Area 34 (4): 382–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, Ayona. 2008. “Spatialising Performance: Masculinities and Femininities in a ‘Fragmented’ Field.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 15 (2): 189–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, Kim. 1994. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research.” The Professional Geographer 46 (1): 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garforth, Lisa. 2012. “In/Visibilities of Research: Seeing and Knowing in STS.” Science, Technology & Human Values 37 (2): 264–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1996. “Modest Witness: Feminist Diffractions of Science Studies.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, 428–442. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, Dean S., and Jacob Appel. 2011. More than Good Intentions: How a New Economics Is Helping to Solve Global Poverty. New York: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Cindi. 2009. “Fieldwork.” In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by Derek Gregory, R. J. Johnston, Geraldine Pratt, Michael Watts, and Sarah Whatmore, 251–252. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, Michi. 2012. “Ethnographische Praxis Im Feld Der Wissenschafts-, Medizin- Und Technikanthropologie.” In Science and Technology Studies: Eine Sozialanthropologische Einführung, edited by Stefan Beck, Jörg Niewöhner, and Estrid Sörensen, 245–274. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes & Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, Wolfgang, and Johannes Weyer. 1994. “Real-Life Experiments. Society as a Laboratory: The Social Risks of Experimental Research.” Science and Public Policy 21 (3): 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1983. “‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World’.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by Karin Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 141–170. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lobo, Michele. 2010. “Negotiating Emotions, Rethinking Otherness in Suburban Melbourne.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 17 (1): 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 1985. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory, Studies in Ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Paul.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, Edward, and Michael Kremer. 2004. “Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities.” Econometrica 72 (1): 159–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Vin-Kim. 2009. “Government-by-Exception: Enrollment and Experimentality in Mass HIV Treatment Programmes in Africa.” Social Theory & Health 7 (3): 196–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petryna, Adriana. 2009. When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1992. “From Science as Knowledge to Science as Practice.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 1–28. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Writing Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Elizabeth F. 2012. God's Laboratory. Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, Dani. 2009. “The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn?” In What Works in Development? edited by Jessica Lee Cohen and William Easterly, 24–47. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottenburg, Richard. 2009. “Social and Public Experiments and New Figurations of Science and Politics in Postcolonial Africa.” Postcolonial Studies 12 (4): 423–440.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr, Carolin, and Bettina Fredrich. 2015. “Serving the Transnational Surrogacy Market as a Development Strategy?” In A Handbook of Gender and Development, edited by Anne Coles, Leslie Grey, and Janet Momsen. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr, Carolin, and Dörte Segebart. 2012. “Tackling Feminist Postcolonial Critique through Participatory and Intersectional Approaches.” Geographica Helvetica 67 (3): 147–154.
   Google Scholar
• Schurr, Carolin, and Heather Walmsley. 2014. “Reproductive Tourism Booms on Mexico's Mayan Riviera.” International Medical Travel Journal  (May 2014). http://www.imtj.com/articles/2014/reproductive-tourism-booms-on-mexicos-mayan-riviera-40194/.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Joanne, Paul Routledge, Chris Philo, and Ronan Paddison. 2000. Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, Robert. 2014. “Infertility Trial Outcomes: Healthy Moms and Babies.” Fertility and Sterility 101 (5): 1209–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, Paul. 1992. “Automythologies and the Reconstruction of Ageing.” In Anthropology and Autobiography, edited by Judith Okely, and Helen Callaway, 50–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, Farhana. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers 6 (3): 374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Teele, Dawn Langan. 2014. Field Experiments and Their Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, Nigel. 2004. “Intensities of Feeling: Towards a Spatial Politics of Affect.” Geografiska Annaler 86 (1): 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, Gill. 2002. “People Like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process.” In Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods, edited by Pamela Moss, 116–126. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Viceisza, Angelino. 2012. Treating the Field as a Lab: A Basic Guide to Conducting Economics Experiments for Policymaking, Food Security in Practice. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. 2000. “Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: In What State is the Art?” Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 447–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdowfield, Rebekah. 2000. “The Place of Emotions in Academic Research.” Area 32 (2): 199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve. 1982. “Laboratory Studies: A Comment on the State of the Art.” Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 481–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar