References

• Barbosa, Gisele Peixoto, Karen Giffin, Antonia Angulo-Tuesta, Andrea de Souza Gama, Dóra Chor, Elenora D’Orsi, and Ana Cristina Gonçalves Vas dos Reis. 2003. “Parto cesáreo: quem o deseja? Em quais circunstâncias?” [Cesarean sections: Who wants them and under what circumstances?] Cadernos de Saúde Pública [Reports in Public Health] 19 (6): 1611–1620.10.1590/S0102-311X2003000600006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckett, Katherine. 2005. “Choosing Cesarean: Feminism and the Politics of childbirth in the United States.” Feminist Theory 6 (3): 251–275.10.1177/1464700105057363
   Google Scholar
• Béhague, Dominique P. 2002. “Beyond the Simple Economics of Cesarean Section Birthing: Women’s Resistance to Social Inequality.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 26 (4): 473–507.10.1023/A:1021730318217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron, Veronique. 2007. “The Ethics of Caesarean Section on Maternal Request: A Feminist Critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Position on Patient-choice Surgery.” Bioethics 21 (9): 478–487.10.1111/biot.2007.21.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell-Penc, Maia, and Kate Boyer. 2007. “Expressing Anxiety? Breast Pump Usage in American wage workplaces.” Gender, Place and Culture 14 (5): 551–567.10.1080/09663690701562248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Kate. 2011. “‘The Way to Break the Taboo is to Do the Taboo Thing’ Breastfeeding in Public and Citizen-activism in the UK.” Health & Place 17: 430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, Kate. 2012. “Affect, Corporeality and the Limits of Belonging: Breastfeeding in Public in the Contemporary UK.” Health & Place 18: 552–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browner, Carole H., and Carolyn F. Sargent. 2011. “Toward Global Anthropological Studies of Reproduction: Concepts, Methods, Theoretical Approaches.” In Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Carole H. Browner and Carolyn F. Sargent, 1–18. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, Joanne, Maree Porter, Sally K. Tracy, and Elizabeth A. Sullivan. 2007. “Caesarean Birth: Consumption, Safety, Order, and Good Mothering.” Social Science and Medicine 65: 1192–1201.10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caetano, André J., and Joseph E. Potter. 2004. “Politics and Female Sterilization in Northeast Brazil.” Population & Development Review 30 (1): 79–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Carmo Leal, Maria, Antônio Augusto Moura, da Silva, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama, Daphne Rattner, Maria Elizabeth Moreira, Mariza Miranda Theme Filha, et al. 2012. “Birth in Brazil: National Survey into Labour and Birth.” Reproductive Health 9: 15. doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz, Carmen Simone Grilo. 2005. “Humanization of Childbirth Care in Brazil: The Numerous Meanings of a Movement.” Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 10 (3): 1413–8123.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz, Simone Grilo, Cecilia De Mello E. Souza, and Ana Paula Portella. 1998. “Not Like Our Mothers: Reproductive Choice and the Emergence of Citizenship Among Brazilian Rural Workers, Domestic Workers and Housewives.” In Negotiating Reproductive Rights: Women’s Perspectives Across Countries and Cultures, edited by Rosalind P. Petchesky and Karen Judd, 31–68. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, Zillah. 2000. “Writing Bodies on the Nation for the Globe.” In Women, States, and Nationalism: At Home in the Nation?, edited by Sita Ranchod-Nilsson and Mary Ann Tétreault, 35–54. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Susan L. 2011. “Global Ethnography: Problems of Theory and Method.” In Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Carole H. Browner and Carolyn F. Sargent, 23–37. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fannin, Maria. 2003. “Domesticating Birth in the Hospital: ‘Family-centered’ Birth and the Emergence of ‘Homelike’ Birthing Rooms.” Antipode 35 (3): 513–535.10.1111/anti.2003.35.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fannin, Maria. 2013. “The Burden of Choosing Wisely: Biopolitics at the Beginning of Life.” Gender, Place, and Culture 20 (3): 273–289.10.1080/0966369X.2012.694355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2011. “The Mystery Child and the Politics of Reproduction: Between National Imaginaries and Transnational Confrontations.” In Reproduction, Globalization, and the State: New Theoretical and Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Carole H. Browner and Carolyn F. Sargent, 239–248. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822393948
   Google Scholar
• Finger, Carla. 2003. “Caesarean Section Rates Skyrocket in Brazil.” The Lancet 362 (9384): 628.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14204-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, Luz, José M. Belizán, Jeremey A. Lauer, Ana P. Betrán, Mario Merialdi, and Fernando Althabe. 2010. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed Per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2002. “Beyond Global vs. Local: Economic Politics Outside the Binary Frame.” In Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, edited by Andrew Herod and Melissa W. Wright, 25–60. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, Faye D., and Rayna Rapp. 1995. “Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, edited by Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp, 1–17. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harootunian, Harry. 2000. History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Betsy. 1995. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2003. “The Possibility of Nationalist Feminism.” Hypatia 18 (3): 135–160.10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb00825.x
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Kristine. 2000. “Are Brazilian Women Really Choosing to Deliver by Cesarean?” Social Science & Medicine 51 (5): 725–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, Margaret. 1998. “Colonial and Postcolonial Plots in Histories of Maternities and Modernities.” In Maternities and modernities, edited by Kalpana Ram and Margaret Jolly, 1–25. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621826
   Google Scholar
• Kilsztajn, Samuel, Manuela S. N. do Carmo, and Luis C. Machado Jr., Erika S. Lopes, and Luciana Z. Lima. 2007. “Caesarean Sections and Maternal Mortality in São Paulo.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 132 (1): 64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, Rebecca. 2014. “Healthy Discretion? Breastfeeding and the Mutual Maintenance of Motherhood and Public Space.” Gender, Place & Culture 21 (2): 195–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Amy Su May, and Maggie Kirkman. 2008. “Disciplinary Discourses: Rates of Cesarean Section Explained by Medicine, Midwifery, and Feminism.” Health Care for Women International 29: 448–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, Robyn. 2005a. “(Ad)dressing Pregnant Bodies in New Zealand: Clothing, Fashion, Subjectivities and Spatialities.” Gender, Place and Culture 12 (4): 433–446.10.1080/09663690500356842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, Robyn. 2005b. “Situating Bodies.” In A Companion to Feminist Geography, edited by Lise Nelson and Joni Seager, 337–349. Portsmouth, NH: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, Robyn. 2008. Maternities: Gender, Bodies, and Space. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longhurst, Robyn. 2009. “YouTube: A New Space for Birth?” Feminist Review 93: 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, Claire, and Henrietta O’Connor. 2005. “Mothers in the Making? Exploring Liminality in Cyber/Space.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1): 83–97.10.1111/tran.2005.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, Becky, and Julie Guthman. 2015. “Epigenetic Life: Biological Pasticity, Abnormality, and New Configurations of Race and Reproduction.” Cultural Geographies 22 (1): 3–20.10.1177/1474474014555659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, Sallie A., John Paul Jones III, and Keith Woodward. 2005. “Human Geography Without Scale.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4): 416–432.10.1111/tran.2005.30.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Tamar. 2000. Gender Ironies of Nationalism: Sexing the Nation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, Cecilia. 2005. “Explaining Caesarean Section in Salvador da Bahia, Brazil.” Sociology of Health & Illness 27 (2): 215–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, Cecilia, and Ana Paula dos Reis. 2005. “Childbirth as Ritual in Brazil: Young Mothers' Experiences.” Ethnos 70 (3): 335–360.10.1080/00141840500294417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, Cecilia, and Ana Paula dos Reis. 2006. “Users’ and Providers’ Perspectives on Technological Procedures for ‘Normal’ Childbirth in a Public Maternity Hospital in Salvador, Brazil.” Salud Pública de México 50 (1): 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministério de Saúde. 2013. “Informações de Saúde.” Brazil’s Ministry of Health Database. Accessed June 18, 2014. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Katharyne, Sallie A. Marston, and Cindi Katz. 2004. Life's Work. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444397468
   Google Scholar
• Nahman, Michal Rachel. 2013. Extractions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137291752
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-world Feminism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dougherty, Maureen. 2013. “Plot and Irony in Childbirth Narratives of Middle-class Brazilian Women.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 27 (1): 43–62.10.1111/maq.12015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, Renato. 1985. Cultura Brasileira e Identidade Nacional [Brazilian Culture and National Identity]. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, Rachel, Cathy Bailey, and Graham Mowl. 2001. “Infant Feeding in North East England: Contested Spaces of Reproduction.” Area 33 (3): 261–272.10.1111/area.2001.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, Joseph E., Elza Berquo, Ignez H. O. Perpetuo, Ondina Fachel Leal, Kristine Hopkins, Marta Rovery Souza, and Maria Cécilia de Carvalho Formiga. 2001. “Unwanted Caesarean Sections Among Public and Private Patients in Brazil: Prospective Study.” BMJ 323 (7322): 1155–1158.10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, Joseph E., Kristine Hopkins, Anibal Faúndes, and Ignacio Perpétuo. 2008. “Women’s Autonomy and Scheduled Cesarean Sections in Brazil: A Cautionary Tale.” Birth 35 (1): 33–40.10.1111/bir.2008.35.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, Kalpana. 1998. “Maternity and the Story of Enlightenment in the Colonies: Tamil Coastal Women, South India.” In Maternities and Modernities, edited by Kalpana Ram and Margaret Jolly, 114–143. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621826
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo, Fernanda, Camilla Medeiros Macedo Da Rocha, Taisa Rodrigues Cortes, Carmen Lucia Dutra, and Gilberto Kac. 2010. “High Cesarean Prevalence in a National Population-based Study in Brazil: The Role of Private Practice.” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 89 (7): 903–908.10.3109/00016349.2010.484044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti, Sabine. 2012. “Preocupação com Sexualidade afasta Brasileira do Parto Normal.” Folha de S. Paolo [Concerns about sexuality turn Brazilians away from normal birth]. February 19. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/equilibrioesaude/2012/02/1050598-preocupacao-com-sexualidade-afasta-brasileira-do-parto-normal.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Sargent, Carolyn, and Lauren Gulbas. 2011. “Situating Birth in the Anthropology of Reproduction.” In A Companion to Medical Anthropology, edited by Merrill Singer and Pamela I. Erickson, 289–303. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444395303
   Google Scholar
• Tsipy, Ivry. 2010. Embodying Culture: Pregnancy in Japan and Israel. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, Kristin P., and Helen L. Ball. 2013. “Misrecognition of Need: Women’s Experiences of and Explanations for Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.” Social Science & Medicine 85: 103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hollen, Cecilia. 2003. Birth on the Threshold: Childbirth and Modernity in South India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wagner, Victoria, and. 2004. “Thinking through the Debate about Caesarean Section ‘On Demand’.” Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice 3 (1): 12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Judith. 2009. “Time as the Fourth Dimension in the Globalization of Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 80 (5): 483–509.10.1353/jhe.0.0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Shannon. 2013. “Conceiving Modernity.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 27 (2): 175–192.10.1111/maq.2013.27.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2009. Monitoring Emergency Obstetric Care: A Handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2013. “Global Health Observatory Data Repository.” Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.531.
   Google Scholar