453
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The entanglements of the law, digital technologies and domestic violence in Seattle

&
Pages 903-923 | Received 09 Sep 2021, Accepted 10 Mar 2022, Published online: 16 Apr 2022

References

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2004. “The Work of Watching One Another: Lateral Surveillance.” Risk and Governance. Surveillance and Society 2 (4): 479–497.
  • Besio, Kathryn, and David Butz. 2004. “Autoethnography: A Limited Endorsement.” The Professional Geographer 56 (3): 432–438.
  • Blomley, Nicholas. 1994. Law, Space and the Geographies of Power. New York: The Guildford Press.
  • Braverman, I. N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and A. Kedar. 2014. The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Brazile, Liz. 2020. “King County Has Already Seen 13 Domestic Violence Homicides in 2020.” KUOW National Public Radio. Accessed 3 September 2020. https://www.kuow.org/stories/13-domestic-violence-homicides-have-happened-in-king-county-this-year
  • Brickell, Katherine, and Dana Cuomo. 2019. “Feminist Geolegality.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (1): 104–122. doi:10.1177/0309132517735706.
  • Bumb, Megan L. 2017. “Domestic Violence Law, Abusers’ Intent, and Social Media: How Transaction-Bound Statutes Are the True Threats to Prosecuting Perpetrators of Gender-Based Violence.” Brooklyn Law Review 82 (2): 917–960.
  • Crampton, Jeremy 2015. “Collect It All: National Security, Big Data and Governance.” GeoJournal 80 (4): 519–531. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9598-y.
  • Cuomo, Dana, and Katherine Brickell. 2019. “Feminist Legal Geographies.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (5): 1043–1049. doi:10.1177/0308518X19856527.
  • Cuomo, Dana, and Natalie Dolci. 2021. “New Tools, Old Abuse: Technology-Enabled Coercive Control (TECC).” Geoforum 126: 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.08.002.
  • Cuomo, Dana, and Natalie Dolci. 2019. Gender-Based Violence and Technology-Enabled Coercive Control in Seattle: Challenges & Opportunities. https://sites.lafayette.edu/cuomod/files/2021/06/Technology-Enabled-Coercive-Control-Whitepaper-2019-1-1.pdf
  • Douglas, Heather, Bridget Harris, and Molly Dragiewicz. 2019. “Technology-Facilitated Domestic and Family Violence: Women’s Experiences.” The British Journal of Criminology 59 (3): 551–570. doi:10.1093/bjc/azy068.
  • Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 36 (4): 273–290.
  • Elwood., Sarah. 2021. “Digital Geographies, Feminist Relationality, Black and Queer Code Studies: Thriving Otherwise.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (2): 209–228. doi:10.1177/0309132519899733.
  • Elwood, Sarah, and Agnieszka Leszczynski. 2018. “Feminist Digital Geographies.” Gender, Place and Culture 25 (5): 629–644. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1465396.
  • Faria, Caroline, Sarah Klosterkamp, Rebecca Maria Torres, and Jayme Walenta. 2020. “Embodied Exhibits: Toward a Feminist Geographic Courtroom Ethnography.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (4): 1095–1113. doi:10.1080/24694452.2019.1680233.
  • Faries, Elizabeth, and Tristan Sturm. 2019. “Feminist Legal Geographies of Intimate-Image Sexual Abuse: Using Copyright Logic to Combat the Unauthorized Distribution of Celebrity Intimate Images in Cyberspaces.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (5): 1145–1165. doi:10.1177/0308518X18786964.
  • Freed, Diana, Jackeline Palmer, Diana Minchala, Karen Levy, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicole Dell. 2018. ““A Stalker’s Paradise”: How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology.” In CHI ‘18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, April 2018. Paper No.: 667, 1-3. doi:10.1145/3173574.3174241.
  • Freeman, Lindsay 2018. “Digital Evidence and War Crimes Prosecutions: The Impact of Digital Technologies on International Criminal Investigations and Trials.” Fordham International Law Journal 41: 283–336.
  • Gorman, Cynthia 2019. “Feminist Legal Archeology, Domestic Violence and the Raced-Gendered Juridicial Boundaries of U.S Asylum Law.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (5): 1050–1067. doi:10.1177/0308518X18757507.
  • Hughes, Rachel. 2015. “Ordinary Theatre and Extraordinary Law at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (4): 714–731. doi:10.1177/0263775815598081.
  • Inslee, Jay. 2020. Proclamation by the Governor: Stay Home – Stay Healthy. State of Washington Office of the Governor. Accessed 1 September 2021. https://www.governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/proclamations/2025%20Coronovirus%20Stay%20Safe-Stay%20Healthy%20%28tmp%29%20%28002%29.pdf
  • Jackson, Lucy, and Gill Valentine. 2014. “Emotion and Politics in a Mediated Public Sphere: Questioning Democracy, Responsibility and Ethics in a Computer Mediated World.” Geoforum 52: 193–202. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.008.
  • Jeffrey, Alex. 2019. “Legal Geography I: Court Materiality.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (3): 565–573. doi:10.1177/0309132517747746.
  • Jeffrey, Alex. 2021. “Legal Geography III: Evidence.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (4): 902–913. doi:10.1177/0309132520973756.
  • Jeffrey, Alex, and Michaelina Jakala. 2014. “The Hybrid Legal Geographies of a War Crimes Court.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104 (3): 652–667. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.892365.
  • Jones, Stacy Holman. 2008. “Autoethnography: Making the Personal Political.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 763–791. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kindon, Sara Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby. 2007. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
  • Kinsley, Sam. 2019. “Subjetc/Ivities.” In Digital Geographies, edited by J. Ash, R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski, 153–162. London: Sage.
  • Kitchin, Rob. 2018. “Governance.” In Digital Geographies, edited by J. Ash, R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski, 238–249. London: Sage.
  • Kitchin, Rob, and Martin Dodge. 2011. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Leszczynski, Agnieszka, and Sarah Elwood. 2015. “Feminist Geographies of New Spatial Media.” The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien 59 (1): 12–28. doi:10.1111/cag.12093.
  • Logan, TK, Robert Walker, William Hoyt, and Teri Faragher. 2015. The Kentucky Civil Protective Order Study: A Rural and Urban Multiple Perspective Study of Protective Order Violation Consequences, Responses, and Costs, 2006-2008. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. doi:10.3886/ICPSR30341.v1.
  • Longhurst, Robyn. 2013. “Using Skype to Mother: Bodies, Emotions, Visuality, and Screens.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (4): 664–679. doi:10.1068/d20111.
  • McLean, Jessica, Sophia Maalsen, and Sarah Prebble. 2019. “A Feminist Perspective on Digital Geographies: Activism, Affect and Emotion, and Gendered Human-Technology Relations in Australia.” Gender, Place and Culture 26 (5): 740–761. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555146.
  • Mulcahy, Linda 2011. Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Powell, Anastasia, and Nicola Henry. 2018. “Policing Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence against Adult Victims: Police and Service Section Perspectives.” Policing and Society 28 (3): 291–307. doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1154964.
  • Pratt, Geraldine. 2000. “Participatory Action Research.” In Dictionary of Human Geography. 4th ed., edited by R. Johnson, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts, 574 Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Rossner, Meredith 2016. “Does The Placement of the Accused at Court Undermine the Right to a Fair Trial?” LES Law – Policy Briefing Paper 18. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887340
  • Rossner, Meredith, David Tait, and Martha McCurdy. 2021. “Justice Reimagined: Challenges and Opportunities with Implementing Virtual Courts.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 33 (1): 94–110. doi:10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968.
  • “Seattle Shooting Leaves Two Dead: Man Kills Pregnant Wife and Friend at King County Courthouse.” 1995. The Spokesman-Review. Accessed 9 September 2021. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1995/mar/03/seattle-shooting-leaves-two-dead-man-kills/
  • Slupska, Julia, and Leonie Tanczer. 2021. “Threat Modeling Intimate Partner Violence: Tech Abuse as a Cybersecurity Challenge in the Internet of Things.” In The Emerald International Handbook of Technology-Facilitated Violence and Abuse, edited by J. Bailey, A. Flynn, and N. Henry, 663–688. West Yorkshire: Emerald Publishing.
  • Staeheli, Lynn, Eleanor Kofman, and Linda Peake. 2004. Mapping Women, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Stark, Evan 2007. Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Statz, Michelle, and Lisa Pruitt. 2019. “To Recognize the Tyranny of Distance: A Spatial Reading of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (5): 1106–1127. doi:10.1177/0308518X18757508.
  • Stoeker, Randy. 2013. Research Methods for Community Change: A Project-Based Approach. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Terry, Matthew, Steve Johnson, and Peter Thompson. 2010. Virtual Court Pilots Outcome Evaluation. Ministry of Justice Research Series 21/10. www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research.htm
  • Valverde, Mariana. 2014. ““Time Thickens, Takes on Flesh”: Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Law.” In The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Geography, edited by Irus. Braverman, Nicholas. Blomley, David Delaney and Alexander Kedar, 53–76. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Walenta, Jayme. 2020. “Courtroom Ethnography: Researching the Intersection of Law, Space and Everyday Practices.” The Professional Geographer 72 (1): 131–138. doi:10.1080/00330124.2019.1622427.
  • Wiig, Alan. 2018. “Secure the City, Eevitalize the Zone: Smart Urbanization in Camden, New Jersey.” Environment and Planning C 36 (3): 403–422.
  • Women’s Law. N.d. Legal Information: General. Last accessed 27 December 2021. https://www.womenslaw.org/laws/general/restraining-orders

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.