82
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Remapping Labour Rights: The Case of Transitional Lithuania

Pages 749-769 | Published online: 01 Jul 2010

References

  • 2000 . Financial Times , 20 December : 15
  • Ibid.
  • EuroBusiness, 2, 8, January 2001, Special Report, Baltic States, p. 69.
  • Ibid, p. 70.
  • R. Bagdzeciciene & G. Belazriene, 'Shadow Economy in Lithuania', Lithuanian Business Review, 2001, 8, pp. 25-28, suggest that the black economy might have made up about 23% of GDP in 2000. This figure is based on an analysis by the Lithuanian Free Market Institute, A Survey of Macroeconomic Variables in Lithuania 2000/2001 (Vilnius, 2000), p. 143, which states that 'the shadow economy accounts for 23% of GDP, unrecorded imports for about 20% of total imports, and unrecorded exports for about 12% of total exports'.
  • OECD, 'Foreign Direct Investment Impact and Policy Analysis--Lithuania', OECD Working Papers, VIII, 2000, No. 92, p. 12.
  • Apart from its two Baltic neighbours, Lithuania only came behind front runners for EU enlargement such as Hungary, Slovenia, Poland and the Czech Republic (cited in A. Valionis, 'Investment Yields Returns', Lithuania in the World, 9, 4, 2001, p. 34).
  • A. Aasland & G. Tyldum, Better or Worse? Living Conditions and Developments in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 1994-1999, Fafo-report 334 (Oslo, Norway, 2000). This three-nation survey of the ex-Soviet Baltic republics ranks Lithuania as the poorest country on the basis of the percentage of household s in relative income poverty (lower than 50% of median income). The respective rates are 15% for Lithuania, 11% for Latvia and 10% for Estonia (p. 6). Only 46% of households in Lithuania have income from wages, compared with 56% for Latvia and Estonia (p. 7). For an academic view on Lithuania's current prospects see M. Taljunaite, R. Blom & H. Melin, Streaming towards Social Stability (Vilnius, Lithuanian Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, and Tampere, Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Tampere, 2000).
  • EuroBusiness, 2, 8, January 2001, p. 8; see also Eurostat News Release, No. 48/2000,18 April 2000. Lithuanian official sources stress the wage cost advantage of investing in the Lithuanian economy, and rank the 'Availability of Well-Trained, Low-Cost Labour Force' (with wages being one-tenth of industrialised countries, including those in the EU, and 20-50% lower than those in CEE states) only behind its advantageous geographical location between CIS and EU. See 'Ten Reasons to Invest in Lithuania', Lithuanian Development Agency, at http://www.lda.lt/.
  • O.G. Rakuaskiene, 'Employment and Prerequisites for its Growth', The Survey of the Lithuanian Economy May 2001, Ministry of Economy and Lithuanian Statistics Department (Vilnius, 2001), p. 145.
  • Figures for 1998 from UN Lithuanian Human Development Report, 1999, p. 69. See also note 13 below.
  • UN Lithuanian Human Development Report, 1999, p. 69.
  • Joel Blocker, 'Lithuania: Crisis Reflects New Eastern Skepticism', RFE/RL Weekly Reports, 21 October 1999, comments that 'public concern over the Williams deal is a sign of rapidly changing attitudes toward Western investment'. See also I. Pasukeviciute & M. Roe, 'The Politics of Oil in Lithuania: Strategies after Transition', Energy Policy, 29, 5, April 2001, pp. 383-397.
  • Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, Resolution on the Programme of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania for 2000-2004, 9 November 2000, No. IX-20, Vilnius.
  • Romas Lazutka, 'Kas Lietuvoje ikalino darba?', Lietuva, December 2000. Even before liberalisation Lithuania had the highest comparative proportion of employees on temporary contracts in the Baltic states. See Aasland & Tyldum, p. 17.
  • 'Labour Relations Liberalised', Lithuanian Seimas, Parliamentary Mirror, 3,43, January 2001, pp. 13-14.
  • V.N. Voloshinov, Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (The Hague, Mouton, 1972).
  • 'LSDPS Profesinis solidarumas', Respublika, 22 March 2001.
  • L. Gadiekts, 'Subsistence Farming--No Way to New Economy', Lithuanian Business Review, 2000, 4, April, p. 13.
  • ELTA News Service, 'Lithuanian PM Pledges Investor Friendly Climate to Finnish Entrepreneurs', 29 August 2001.
  • Kauno Diena, 6 September 2001.
  • Orthodox Marxist analyst s would, of course, argue that all legal initiative s of capitalist states are aimed at strengthening or 'preserving the ideological basis of capitalism'. See for example R. Quinney, Critique of Legal Order (Boston, Little and Brown, 1973), pp. 55-56.
  • This is the well known argument on the political implications of foreign investment formulated by Baran & Sweezy in the mid-1960s (see P. Baran & P. Sweezy, 'Notes on the Theory of Imperialism', Monthly Review, 17, 10, 1966).
  • The structural limits of neo-liberal rule have been discussed by, inter alia, R. Griffiths, 'Capitalist Crisis: A Vindication of Marxist Political Economy', Communist Review, 27, 1998.
  • This issue has received some, albeit superficial, analytical treatment in L. Thurow, Generating Inequality (New York, Basic Books, 1975).
  • Reuters, 'Lithuanian Jan Jobless Hits 13.1 pet, 10-yr High', 3 February 2001; see also Lithuania Labour Exchange, at http://www.ldb.lt/eng/sit.htm. The highest unemployment rates on 1 January 2001 were registered in Druskininkai (27%), Akmenë (24%) and Pasvalys (22.8%). An unemployment rate of more than 20% was registered in seven territories and of more than 15% in six of ten regions.
  • UN Lithuanian Human Development Report, 1999, p. 64.
  • R. Dovydeniene, 'Trade Union Responses to Globalization in Lithuania', International Labour Organisation, Institute for Labour Studies, Labour and Society Programme, 2000, at http://www.ilo.org/ public/bureau/inst/papers/1999/dpl 11/index htm#intro.
  • Lithuanian Department of Statistics 2000 Yearbook (Vilnius, 2000). The expenditure on food amongst the wealthiest 10% was 3.8 times greater than that of the poorest 10%. The private share of Lithuania's GDP increased from just under 40% in 1992 to over 70% in 1998.
  • Ibid., p. 9.
  • US Embassy, 1998 Country Commercial Guide: Lithuania (Vilnius, 1988).
  • US Embassy, 1998 Country Commercial Guide: Lithuania.
  • Lenin on Trade Unions (Moscow, Progress Publishers, nd); I. Deutscher, Soviet Trade Unions: Their Place in Soviet Labour Policy (London, Oxford University Press, 1950); Alex Pravda & Blair A. Ruble (eds), Trade Unions in Communist States (Boston, Alien & Unwin, 1986) ; Blair A Ruble, Soviet Trade Unions: Their Development in the 1970s (Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press, 1981).
  • Republic of Lithuania, 'Law on Trade Unions', 21 November 1991, No. I-2018. English version at http://www.litlex.lt/Litlex/Eng/Frames/Laws/Documents/60.HTM.
  • Republic of Lithuania, 'Law on the Regulation of Collective Disputes', 17 March 1992, No. I-2386. English version at http://www3.lrs.lt/c-bin/eng
  • UN Human Development Report Lithuania, 1997, chapter 4; see also Lithuanian Secretariat of Tripartite Board at http://www.socmin.lt/trisale/index.html
  • European Commission, 2000 Regular Report on Lithuania's Progress Towards Accession, chapter 13 (Brussels, 2000), pp. 62-93, at http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/report 11 00/index.htm#Reports ; G. Casale (ed.). Social Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest, International Labour Office, 1999); J. Due, M. Maflanda & V. Makarov, 'Social Dialogue in the Baltic Countries', report for the 'Seminar on Social Dialogue in the Baltic Sea Region', Warsaw, 25-26 October 2000 (University of Copenhagen, Employment Relations Research Centre, 2000).
  • R. Dovydeniene & G. Casale, 'Industrial Relations and Tripartism in Lithuania', in Casale (ed.), p. 230, suggest that about 20-25% of the working population are union members but note that not all unions provide accurate figures. Aasland & Tyldum, p. 17, suggest that trade union membership extends to only 5% of the workforce (as against 8% in Estonia and 10% in Latvia).
  • R. Valtaka, 'Fear of Investment--Escalated Myth', Lithuanian Business Review, 2000, 4, April, pp. 11-12.
  • Brazauskas was to receive the ultimate accolade from EU enlargement commissioner Verbeugen by way of an assurance that Brussels 'had full confidence in his reformist credentials'. By contrast to the former communist premier of Slovakia whose recent return to office was said to threaten Slovakia's progress in accession talks', Brazauskas was described as a 'successful former president' who had initiated Lithuania's drive for integration into the EU. See A. Lobjakas, 'Lithuania: Verbeugen Hints At First-Wave EU Membership', RFE/RL Weekly Reports, 24 July 2001.
  • With liberalisation of the labour market and bankruptcy law high on the political agenda for 2001, most observers have predicted even sharper rises in unemployment in the coming period as further restructuring takes place (see Rakuaskiene, p. 140). Following an increase in the number of companies declaring bankruptcy under the terms of the existing Lithuanian Law on the Bankruptcy of Enterprises, and having financial difficulties in paying their workers, an urgent decree of the government, passed on 1 September 1997, temporarily established a fund to meet the demands of the workers of enterprises currently undergoing or having experienced bankruptcy. During the year 1998 a total of 31.7 million LTL of repayable financial assistance was granted to 21 enterprises under this Fund for Bankrupt Enterprises. See Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour, Social Report, 1998 (Vilnius, 1999), pp. 8 and 25. Employer opposition to this fund (0.02% of their contribution to the national social security budget) has been sustained and compulsory contribution s have been much resented. Remarkably, official sources continue to emphasise the employability of the highly educated Lithuanian workforce, of which 17.9% possess university degrees and 44.1% a specialised education (i.e. technical certificates) (Lithuanian Development Agency, A Practical Guide for Investors in Lithuania, at http://www.lda.lt).
  • The notions of a 'race to the bottom' or 'races to laxity', to which our argument bears close resemblance, are well developed in the US literature on state environmental legislation. For a review of this literature see for example P. S wire, "The Race to Laxity and the Race to Undesirabflity : Explaining Failures in Competition Among Jurisdictions in US Law', Yale Journal on Regulation, 14, 67, 1996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.