The Legislative Logic of Electoral Reform in Ukraine

References

• Arel, D. & Wilson, A. (1994) ‘The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections’, RFE/RL Research Report, 3, 26.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, K. (1993) ‘The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome’, American Journal of Political Science, 37, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, C. (1990) ‘The Personal Vote in Australian Federal Elections’, Political Studies, 38, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. (2004) ‘Models of Electoral System Change’, Electoral Studies, 23, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. & Hayden, J. (2004) ‘Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland’s Electoral System, 1989–2001’, The Journal of Politics, 66, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K. & Schiemann, J. (2001) ‘Institutional Choice in New Democracies: Bargaining over Hungary’s 1989 Electoral Law’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (1995) ‘Electoral Behaviour in Western Ukraine in National Elections and Referendums, 1989–91’, Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (1997) ‘Nomenklatura Democratization: Electoral Clientelism in Post-Soviet Ukraine’, Democratization, 4, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (2000) Elections and Democratization in Ukraine (New York, NY, St Martin’s Press).
   Google Scholar
• Boix, C. (1999) ‘Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 93, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojcun, M. (1995) ‘The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections in March–April 1994’, Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, D. & Mo, J. (1992) ‘Electoral Systems and Institutional Choice: A Case Study of the 1988 Korean Elections’, Comparative Political Studies, 24, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, E. & Micozzi, J. (2005) ‘The Governor’s Backyard: A Seat-Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races’, The Journal of Politics, 67, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (2009) Legislative Voting and Accountability (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. & Shugart, M. (1995) ‘Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas’, Electoral Studies, 14, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. (2007) Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R., Rakhimkulov, E. & Wise, C. (2005) ‘The Ukrainian Orange Revolution Brought More than a New President: What Kind of Democracy will the Institutional Changes Bring?’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, J. (ed.) (2004) Handbook of Electoral System Choice (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Colomer, J. (2005) ‘It’s Parties that Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down)’, Political Studies, 53, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Anieri, P. (2007) Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics, and Institutional Design (Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe).
   Google Scholar
• D’Anieri, P., Kravchuk, R. & Kuzio, T. (1999) Politics and Society in Ukraine (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).
   Google Scholar
• Diuk, N. & Gongadze, M. (2002) ‘Post-Election Blues in Ukraine’, Journal of Democracy, 13, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties (New York, NY, Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, R. (1978) Home Style: House Members in their Districts (Boston, MA, Little, Brown).
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. (1997) Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Frechette, G., Maniquet, F. & Morelli, M. (2008) ‘Incumbents’ Interests and Gender Quotas’, American Journal of Political Science, 52, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2005) ‘Conclusion’, in Gallagher, M. & Mitchell, P. (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E. (2002) ‘Mixed Electoral Rules and Party Strategies: Responses to Incentives by Ukraine’s Rukh and Russia’s Yabloko’, Party Politics, 8, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, E. (2004) ‘Political Actors, Preferences and Election Rule Re-design in Russia and Ukraine’, Democratization, 11, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Herron, E. (2007) ‘State Institutions, Political Context and Parliamentary Election Legislation in Ukraine, 2000–2006’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 23, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (2005) ‘Why are There So Many (or So Few) Electoral Reforms?’, in Gallagher, M. & Mitchell, P. (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (1990) ‘Electoral Responsiveness and Partisan Bias in Multiparty Democracies’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P. (2000) ‘Regional Polarisation in Ukraine: Public Opinion, Voting and Legislative Behaviour’, Europe-Asia Studies, 52, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P. (2001) ‘The Limits of Electoral Democracy in Ukraine’, Democratization, 8, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. (2003) ‘The 2002 Parliamentary Elections in Ukraine: Democratization or Authoritarianism?’, Journal of Communist Studies & Transition Politics, 19, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. (2005) ‘Regime Type and Politics in Ukraine under Kuchma’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990 (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. (1993) ‘Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway’, The Journal of Politics, 55, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• McElwain, K. M. (2008) ‘Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single-Party Dominance’, American Journal of Political Science, 52, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. (1999) ‘Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Post-Communist States’, World Politics, 51, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, B. (2003) ‘Political Parties and the Size of Government in Multiparty Legislatures: Examining Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence’, Comparative Political Studies, 36, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, P. (1994) ‘The Growth of the Constituency Role of the MP’, Parliamentary Affairs, 47, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. & Wood, D. (1990) ‘Constituency Service by Members of Parliament: Does it Contribute to a Personal Vote?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 43, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, J.-B. (2003) ‘Strategies under the Surface: The Determinants of Redistricting in Belgium’, Comparative European Politics, 5, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Protsyk, O. (2003) ‘Troubled Semi-Presidentialism: Stability of the Constitutional System and Cabinet in Ukraine’, Europe-Asia Studies, 55, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. (2007) ‘Democratization and Electoral Reform in the Asia-Pacific Region: Is There an “Asian Model” of Democracy?’, Comparative Political Studies, 40, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, T. & Smith, S. (1996) ‘Political Goals, Institutional Context, and the Choice of an Electoral System: The Russian Parliamentary Electoral Law’, American Journal of Political Science, 40, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, A. (2010) The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, A., Hanretty, C. & Hine, D. (2009) ‘Partisan Self-Interest and Electoral Reform: The New Italian Electoral Law 2005’, Electoral Studies, 28, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. (1999) ‘Women in the Legislatures and Executives in the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling’, World Politics, 51, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. (2008) ‘Inherent and Contingent Factors in Reform Initiation in Plurality Systems’, in Blais, A. (ed.) To Keep or To Change First Past the Post? The Politics of Electoral Reform (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. & Carey, J. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. & Wattenberg, M. (eds) (2001) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. & Muller, W. (eds) (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Thames, F. (2005) ‘A House Divided: Party Strength and the Mandate Divide in Hungary, Russia, and Ukraine’, Comparative Political Studies, 38, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames, F. (2007) ‘Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J. & King, G. (2003) ‘CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results’, Journal of Statistical Software, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics (Berkley, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1996a) Stenograma N 43 (zasidannaya 14 listopada 1996 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL26/141196_43.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1996b) Stenograma N 44 (zasidannaya 14 listopada 1996 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL26/141196_44.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1997a) Byuleten’ N 04 (zasidannaya 10 veresnya 1997 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL28/100997_04.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1997b) Byuleten’ N 13 (zasidannaya 18 veresnya 1997 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL28/180997_13.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1997c) Byuleten’ N 139 (zasidannaya 29 serpnya 1997 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL27/290897_139.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1997d) Byuleten’ N 18 (zasidannaya 24 veresnya 1997 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL28/240997_18.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (1997e) Byuleten’ N 27 (zasidannaya 5 bereznya 1997 r.), available at: http://www.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl2/BUL24/171095_27.htm, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002a) Poyasnuval’na zapiska. Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnyx deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002b) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 1, No. 1017.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002c) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 1, No. 1017-1.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002d) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002e) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-3.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002f) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 1, No. 1017-4.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002g) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-5.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002h) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-6.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2002i) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny. IVth Convocation, Session 2, No. 1017-7.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2003) Zasidannaya N 21 (14 zhovtnya 2003 r.), available at: http://static.rada.gov.ua/zakon/skl4/4session/STENOGR/4SES/14100304_21.htm, accessed 8 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2006) Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine: official website, available at: http://portal.rada.gov.ua/, accessed 24 May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2010) Proekt vyborchogo kodesksu Ukrainy. VIth Convocation, Session 6.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovna Rada (2011) Proekt Zakonu pro vybory narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny, VIth Convocation, Session 9, No. 9265-d, available at: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=41814, accessed 6 June 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H. & John, P. (1999) ‘Targeting Benefits for Electoral Gain: Constituency Marginality and the Distribution of Grants to English Local Authorities’, Political Studies, 47, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasylyk, M. (1994) ‘Ukraine Prepares for Parliamentary Elections’, RFE/RL Research Report, 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, S. (2004) State-building in Ukraine: The Ukrainian Parliament, 1990–2003 (New York, NY, RoutlegeCurzon).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. (2005) Ukraine’s Orange Revolution (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. & Bilous, A. (1993) ‘Political Parties in Ukraine’, Europe-Asia Studies, 45, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. & Birch, S. (1999) ‘Voting Stability, Political Gridlock: Ukraine’s 1998 Parliamentary Elections’, Europe-Asia Studies, 51, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar