The Role of Power in EU–Russia Energy Relations: The Interplay between Markets and Geopolitics

References

• Bach, D. & Newman, A. L. (2007) ‘The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-institutions, Macro-influence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. (2012) Russia’s Position on the Energy Charter, Chatham House Meeting Summary, 27 April (London, Chatham House).
   Google Scholar
• Belyi, A. (2015) Transnational Gas Markets and Euro-Russian Energy Relations (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Boedeltje, F. & Van Houtum, F. (2011) ‘Brussels is Speaking: The Adverse Speech Geo-Politics of the European Union Towards its Neighbours’, Geopolitics, 16, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosse, G. (2011) ‘The EU’s Geopolitical Vision of a European Energy Space: When “Gulliver” meets “White Elephants” and Verdi’s Babylonian King’, Geopolitics, 16, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casier, T. (2011) ‘The Rise of Energy to the Top of the EU–Russia Agenda: From Interdependence to Dependence?’, Geopolitics, 16, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casier, T. (2016) ‘Great Game or Great Confusion: The Geopolitical Understanding of EU–Russia Energy Relations’, Geopolitics, 21, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012) ‘Market Power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiryol, T. (2015) ‘Interdependence, Balancing and Conflict in Russian–Turkish Relations’, in Klieman, A. (ed.) Great Powers and Geopolitics (Heidelberg, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, R., Hassanzadeh, E., Henderson, J., Honoré, A., El-Katiri, L., Pirani, S., Rogers, H., Stern, J. & Yafimava, K. (2014) Reducing European Dependence on Russian Gas: Distinguishing Natural Gas Security from Geopolitics, OIES Paper 92 (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. (1972) ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in Mayne, R. (ed.) Europe Tomorrow, Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead (London, Collins Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Farchy, J. (2015) ‘Gazprom Bows to Brussels by Holding First European Gas Auction’, Financial Times, 7 September, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/ad9a8a5e-5556-11e5-8642-453585f2cfcd, accessed 27 April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. (2016) Nord Stream 2: Trust in Europe (Zurich, Center for Security Studies)
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, T. (2013) ‘The Power of the European Union: What Explains the EU’s (lack of) Influence on Russia?’, Politique Européenne, 39, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. & Sitter, N. (2014) ‘A Liberal Actor in a Realist World? The Commission and the External Dimension of the Single Market for Energy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. & Sitter, N. (2015) ‘Soft Power with a Hard Edge: EU Policy Tools and Energy Security’, Review of International Political Economy, 22, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotev, G. (2017) ‘EU–Gazprom Deal Clears Bulgaria of South Stream Cancellation Claims’, Euractiv, 13 March, available at: http://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-gazprom-deal-clears-bulgaria-of-south-stream-cancellation-claims, accessed 23 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gotev, G. (2018) ‘Poland Rolls out Big Legal Gun against Nord Stream 2’, Euractiv, 9 May, available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/poland-rolls-out-big-legal-gun-against-nord-stream-2/, accessed 10 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Grigas, A. (2013) The Politics of Energy and Memory between the Baltic States and Russia (Farnham, Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Grigorjeva, J. & Siddi, M. (2016) Nord Stream 2: Opportunities and Dilemmas of a New Gas Supply Route for the EU (Berlin, Jacques Delors Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, A. (2008) ‘EU–Russia Energy Relations: Aggregation and Aggravation’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 16, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Hecking, H. & Schulte, S. (2016) ‘Nord Stream 2: Gazprom’s Answer to a Strategic Disadvantage?’, EWI Energy Research and Scenarios, 2 December, available at: http://www.ewi.research-scenarios.de/de/nord-stream-2-gazproms-answer-to-a-strategic-disadvantage/, accessed 26 April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P. (2013) Red Gas: Russia and the Origins of European Energy Dependence (New York, NY, Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• IEA (2014) World Energy Outlook 2014 (Paris, OECD/International Energy Agency).
   Google Scholar
• Judge, A., Maltby, T. & Sharples, J. (2016) ‘Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU–Russia Energy Relations’, Geopolitics, 21, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveshnikov, N. (2010) ‘The Issue of Energy Security in Relations between Russia and the European Union’, European Security, 19, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Konarzewska, N. (2015) ‘Will Turkish Stream Compete with the Southern Gas Corridor?’, The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 13 May.
   Google Scholar
• Kononczuk, W. (2015) ‘Why Ukraine has to Reform its Gas Sector’, Energy Post, 10 September, available at: http://energypost.eu/ukraine-reform-gas-sector/, accessed 25 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kropatcheva, E. (2011) ‘Playing Both Ends Against the Middle: Russia’s Geopolitical Energy Games with the EU and Ukraine’, Geopolitics, 16, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kustova, I. (2015) ‘EU–Russia Energy Relations, EU Energy Integration, and Energy Security: The State of the Art and a Roadmap for Future Research’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kustova, I. (2017) ‘Towards a Comprehensive Research Agenda on EU Energy Integration: Policy Making, Energy Security, and EU Energy Actorness’, Journal of European Integration, 39, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzemko, C. (2014) ‘Ideas, Power and Change: Explaining EU–Russia Energy Relations’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loskot-Strachota, A. & Zachmann, G. (2014) Rebalancing the EU–Russia–Ukraine Gas Relationship, Bruegel Policy Contribution (Brussels, Bruegel).
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, J. & Minio-Paluello, M. (2013) The Oil Road: Journeys from the Caspian Sea to the City of London (London, Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. & Nicolaidis, K. (2006) ‘The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mironova, I. (2014) Russia and the Energy Charter Treaty, 7 August (Brussels, Energy Charter Secretariat), available at: https://energycharter.org/what-we-do/knowledge-centre/occasional-papers/russia-and-the-energy-charter-treaty/, accessed 10 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. L. & Posner, E. (2010) ‘International Interdependence and Regulatory Power: Authority, Mobility, and Markets’, European Journal of International Relations, 17, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York, NY, Public Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• Oxenstierna, S. & Tynkkynen, V. (eds) (2014) Russian Energy and Security up to 2030 (Abingdon, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pirani, S. (2014) Ukraine’s Imports of Russian Gas: How a Deal Might be Reached, Oxford Energy Comment (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Pirani, S., Stern, J. & Yafimava, K. (2009) The Russo–Ukrainian Gas Dispute of January 2009: A Comprehensive Assessment, OIES Paper 27 (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Pirani, S. & Yafimava, K. (2016) Russian Gas Transit Across Ukraine Post-2019: Pipeline Scenarios, Gas Flow Consequences, and Regulatory Constraints, OIES Paper 105 (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Proedrou, F. (2016) ‘Why Russian Gas Diplomacy Fails: The Geopolitics–Energy Nexus in Ukraine and Turkey’, Asia Europe Journal, 15, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanova, T. (2016) ‘Is Russian Energy Policy Towards the EU Only about Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package’, Geopolitics, 21, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, N. (2014) ‘Geopolitical Implications of the US Unconventional Energy Revolution’, The International Spectator, 49, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, J. (2015) Gazprom Monitor, 47, European Geopolitical Forum, April.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2016a) ‘The EU’s Energy Union: A Sustainable Path to Energy Security?’, The International Spectator, 51, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2016b) ‘German Foreign Policy Towards Russia in the Aftermath of the Ukraine Crisis: A New Ostpolitik?’, Europe-Asia Studies, 68, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2017a) ‘The EU’s Gas Relationship with Russia: Solving Current Disputes and Strengthening Energy Security’, Asia Europe Journal, 15, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2017b) ‘Identities and Vulnerabilities: The Ukraine Crisis and the Securitisation of EU–Russia Gas Trade’, in Szulecki, K. (ed.) Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2017c) ‘The EU’s Botched Geopolitical Approach to External Energy Policy: The Case of the Southern Gas Corridor’, Geopolitics, available online first at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14650045.2017.1416606, accessed 11 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2017d) ‘EU–Russia Energy Relations: From a Liberal to a Realist Paradigm?’, Russian Politics, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2018a) Russia’s Evolving Gas Relationship with the European Union: Trade Surges despite Political Crises, FIIA Briefing Paper 246 (Helsinki, Finnish Institute of International Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. (2018b) ‘The Arctic Route for Russian LNG Opens’, WE_World Energy 83, March, available at: https://www.aboutenergy.com/en_IT/topics/arctic-route-for-russian-lng-opens.shtml, accessed 10 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, O. P. (2010) ‘A Corridor Through Thorns: EU Energy Security and the Southern Energy Corridor’, European Security, 19, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J. & Yafimava, K. (2017) The EU Competition Investigation of Gazprom’s Sales in Central and Eastern Europe: A Detailed Analysis of the Commitments and the Way Forward, OIES Paper 121 (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Stulberg, A. (2015) ‘Out of Gas?: Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the Changing Geopolitics of Natural Gas’, Problems of Post-Communism, 62, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagliapietra, S. (2018) Beyond Nord Stream 2: A Look at Russia’s Turk Stream Project, 4 July (Brussels, Bruegel), available at: http://bruegel.org/2018/07/beyond-nord-stream-2-a-look-at-russias-turk-stream-project/, accessed 10 October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Tagliapietra, S. & Zachmann, G. (2015) The Russian Pipeline Waltz, 18 June (Brussels, Bruegel), available at: http://bruegel.org/2015/06/the-russian-pipeline-waltz/, accessed 24 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Talus, K. (2013) EU Energy Law and Policy: A Critical Account (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Toplensky, R. & Foy, H. (2017) ‘Gazprom Reaches Draft Antitrust Deal with EU’, Financial Times, 13 March, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/575f8d2e-07f2-11e7-ac5a-903b21361b43, accessed 23 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2009) ‘Russia’s Spheres of Interest, not Influence’, The Washington Quarterly, 32, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, T. (2015) ‘The Energy Parameters of the Russian–Ukrainian–EU Impasse: Dependencies, Sanctions and the Rise of “Turkish Stream”’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 15, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari, M. S. (2017) ‘TurkStream and its Second Line: Challenge for Some, Opportunity for Others’, Vocal Europe, 17 January, available at: http://www.vocaleurope.eu/the-turkstream-and-its-second-line-challenge-for-some-opportunity-for-others/, accessed 22 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Weinland, D. & Foy, H. (2017) ‘Gazprom Close to Revealing Financing for $11bn Pipeline’, Financial Times, 2 March, available at: https://www.ft.com/content/4214c756-ff44-11e6-96f8-3700c5664d30, accessed 24 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wrobel, A. (2017) ‘Naftogaz: A Good Start has Slowed, but Optimism Remains High’, Emerging Europe, 25 March, available at: http://emerging-europe.com/sectors/gas/naftogaz-a-good-start-has-slowed-but-optimism-remains-high/, accessed 25 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yafimava, K. (2015) European Energy Security and the Role of Russian Gas: Assessing the Feasibility and the Rationale of Reducing Dependence, IAI Working Paper 15 (Rome, Istituto Affari Internazionali).
   Google Scholar
• Yafimava, K. (2017) The OPAL Exemption Decision: Past, Present and Future, OIES Paper 117 (Oxford, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Yergin, D. (2006) ‘Ensuring Energy Security’, Foreign Policy, 2, 85.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. (2017) Europe’s Eastern Crisis: The Geopolitics of Asymmetry (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar