A Critical Political Cosmopolitanism for Conflict De-escalation: The Crimean Example

References

• Allan, P. & Keller, A. (2006) ‘The Concept of a Just Peace, or Achieving Peace Through Recognition, Renouncement, and Rule’, in Allan, P. & Keller A. (eds) What is a Just Peace? (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. S. (1999) ‘What is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics, 109, 2. doi: 10.1086/233897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. B. (1999) Do No Harm. How Aid Can Support Peace—Or War (Boulder, CO, & London, Lynne Rienner).
   Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D. (2008) The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Barry, B. (1998) ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, in Mapel, D. R. & Nardin, T. (eds) International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2006) The Cosmopolitan Vision (Cambridge & Malden, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Beitz, C. R. (1989) Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Beitz, C. R. (1999) Political Theory and International Relations (revised edn) (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1996) ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (2007) Democracy across Borders: From Dēmos to Dēmoi (Cambridge, MA, & London, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, D. (1998) Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Brassett, J. & Smith, W. (2008) ‘Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan, and Critical Perspectives’, Ethics & International Affairs, 22, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, M. (2008) The New Politics of Conflict Resolution: Responding to Difference (Basingstoke & New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. W. (2011) ‘Bringing the State Back into Cosmopolitanism: The Idea of Responsible Cosmopolitan States’, Political Studies Review, 9, 1. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. (2007) Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream (New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. H. (1964) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (2nd edn) (New York, NY, Harper & Row).
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (1998) ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50, 2. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. & Sabel, C. (2006) ‘Global Democracy’, Journal of International Law and Politics, 37, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Devatek, R. (2005) ‘Critical Theory’, in Burchill, S., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Linklater, A., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C. & True, J. (eds) Theories of International Relations (3rd edn) (Basingstoke & New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Devatek, R. & Higgott, R. (1999) ‘Justice Unbound? Globalization, States and the Transformation of the Social Bond’, International Affairs, 75, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovi, S. (2006) ‘Political Representation’, available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/political-representation/, accessed 24 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Drohobycky, M. (ed.) (1995) Crimea: Dynamics, Challenges, and Prospects (Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1990) Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in Elster, J. (ed.) Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Erskine, T. (2003) ‘Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and “Quasi-States”’, in Erskine, J. (ed.) Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations (Basingstoke & New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1993) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda (New York, NY, Crown Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. (2012) ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy: Neither a Category Mistake nor a Categorical Imperative’, in Archibugi, D., Marchetti, R. & Koenig-Archibugi, M. (eds) Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives (Cambridge & New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2007) ‘Dialektik der Moral. Grundlagen einer Diskurstheorie transnationaler Gerechtigkeit’, in Niesen, P. & Herborth, B. (eds) Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2011) The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man (New York, NY, Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. (1996) Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilisation (London & Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, G., Courtland, S. D. & Schmidtz, D. (2015) ‘Liberalism’, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/liberalism/, accessed 13 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gaxie, D. (1993) La démocratie représentative (Paris, Montchrestien).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (2nd edn) (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2005) ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’, in Brock, G. & Brighouse, H. (eds) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge & New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2010) Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, K. (1999) International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era (London & Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (1999) New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2009) ‘Who Is the Enemy?’, in Kaldor, M. & Kalyvas, S. (eds) Contemporary Violent Conflict, The Broker Issue, 14, available at: https://bibalex.org/baifa/Attachment/Documents/138183.pdf, accessed 24 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2001) ‘Governance in a Partially Globalized World’, American Political Science Review, 95, 1. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. (2007) Ukraine–Crimea–Russia: Triangle of Conflict (Stuttgart, Ibidem-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (2001) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship (Oxford & New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, T. (2010) Sauver la face, sauver la paix: Sociologie constructiviste des crises internationales (Paris, L’Harmatan).
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. (2001a) ‘The Changing Contours of Critical International Relations Theory’, in Jones, R. W. (ed.) Critical Theory and World Politics (Boulder, CO, & London, Lynne Rienner).
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. (2001b) ‘Citizenship, Humanity, and Cosmopolitan Harm Conventions’, International Political Science Review, 22, 3. doi: 10.1177/0192512101223004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, A. (2007) Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity (New York, NY, & Abingdon, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1995) ‘Is Patriotism a Virtue?’, in Beiner, R. (ed.) Theorizing Citizenship (Albany, NY, State University of New York Press).
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B. (1995) Principes du gouvernement représentatif (Paris, Calmann-Levy).
   Google Scholar
• McFaul, M. (2014) ‘Moscow’s Choice’, Foreign Affairs, 93, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19, 3. doi: 10.2307/2539078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (London & New York, NY, Norton).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1995) On Nationality (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1972) Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace (5th edn) (New York, NY, Alfred A. Knopf).
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H. (1994) ‘Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln: Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H. (2004) ‘Arguing, Bargaining and all That: Communicative Action, Ratonalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 10, 3. doi: 10.1177/1354066104045542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2006) Hearing the Other Side Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Niesen, P. (2007) ‘Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit—ein Problemaufriss’, in Niesen, P. & Herborth, B. (eds) Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1997) ‘Kant and Cosmopolitanism’, in Bohman, J. & Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant‘s Cosmopolitan Ideal (Cambridge, MA, & London, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) Woman and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge & New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2005) ‘Beyond the Social Contract’, in Brock, G. & Brighouse, H. (eds) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge & New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. (1967) The Concept of Representation (Berkeley, CA, & London, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. M. (1989) Realizing Rawls (Ithaca, NY, & London, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. M. (2002a) ‘Can the Capability Approach be Justified?’, Philosophical Topics, 30, 2. doi: 10.5840/philtopics200230216
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. M. (2002b) ‘Cosmopolitanism: A Defence’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 5, 3. doi: 10.1080/13698230410001702672
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. M. (2008) World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2nd edn) (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, M., Turner, M. & Cooper, N. (eds) (2008) Whose Peace? Critical Perspectives on the Political Economy of Peacebuilding (London, Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T. & Miall, H. (2011) Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts (3rd edn) (Cambridge & Malden, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA & London, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2004) ‘Global Governance and Communicative Action’, Government and Opposition, 39, 2. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. (2007) The Crimea Question: Identity: Transition, and Conflict (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schmemann, S. (1993) ‘Russian Parliament Votes a Claim to Ukrainian Port of Sevastopol’, New York Times, 10 July, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/10/world/russian-parliament-votes-a-claim-to-ukrainian-port-of-sevastopol.html, accessed 21 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1987) ‘The Standard of Living’, in Hawthorn, G. (ed.) The Standard of Living (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined (New York, NY, & Oxford, Russel Sage Foundation & Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1999) Development as Freedom (New York, NY, Alfred A. Knopf).
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2006) Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (New York, NY, W.W. Norton & Co).
   Google Scholar
• Shapcott, R. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan Conversations: Justice, Dialogue and the Cosmopolitan Community’, Global Society, 16, 3. doi: 10.1080/09537320220148058
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J., Bächtinger, A., Spörndli, M. & Steenbergen, M. R (2004) Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse (Cambridge & New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1992) Multiculturalism and ‘The Politics of Recognition’ (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ünal, A. (2014) ‘Current Situation Worse Than Soviet Era’, Daily Sabah, 1 December, available at: https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2014/12/01/current-situation-worse-than-soviet-era, accessed 14 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2015) ‘TV Rain: Inside Russia’s Only Independent Television Channel’, The Guardian, 9 June, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/09/tv-rain-russia-only-independent-television-channel, accessed 14 January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley).
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (1990) ‘Realist Thought and Realist Theory’, Journal of International Affairs, 44, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (New York, NY, Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organisation, 46, 2. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1998) Voice, Trust, and Memory. Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar