Russia’s Architecture of Hegemony: Christian Orthodox Subordination Strategies in Russia’s Peripheral Zone

References

• Anderson, J. (2007) ‘Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church: A Symmetric Symphonia?’, Journal of International Affairs, 61, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Athanasiou, B. (2016) ‘The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. A Religious Minority and a Global Player’, Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, 26, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bociurkiw, B. R. (2003) ‘Some Methodological Problems in Writing a History of the Orthodox Church in Interwar Soviet Ukraine (1921–1939)’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 26, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckh, K. (2016) ‘Ukraine After the Euromaidan: Ecumenism Versus Religious Repression’, in Krawchuk, A. & Bremer, T. (eds) Churches in the Ukrainian Crisis (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, T. (2016) ‘Religion in Ukraine: Historical Background and the Present Situation’, in Krawchuk, A. & Bremer, T. (eds) Churches in the Ukrainian Crisis (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Buciora, J. (2018) ‘Canonical Territory of the Moscow Patriarchate. An Analysis of Contemporary Russian Orthodox Thought’, All Saints of Ukraine Chapel, available at: http://www.allsaintschapel.ca/lectures/canonical-territory-of-the-moscow-patriarchate/, accessed 28 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bugajski, J. (2010) ‘Russia’s Pragmatic Reimperialization’, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, 4, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York, NY, Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H. & Wight, M. (1966) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Z. (2018) ‘Russia’s Orthodox Church Has Opened 30,000 Places of Worship in Last 30 Years’, Aleteia, 2 January, available at: https://aleteia.org/2018/01/02/russias-orthodox-church-has-opened-30000-places-of-worship-in-last-30-years/, accessed 28 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. & Spruyt, H. (2009) Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, J. J. (2018) Russia’s Border Wars and Frozen Conflicts (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Curanović, A. (2007) ‘The Attitude of the Moscow Patriarchate Towards Other Orthodox Churches’, Religion, State and Society, 35, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957) ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, 2, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, W. L. (2006) The Orthodox Church and Civil Society in Russia (College Station, TX, Texas A&M University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2015) Ukraine between the EU and Russia: The Integration Challenge (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Dragneva, R. & Wolczuk, K. (2016) ‘Between Dependence and Integration: Ukraine’s Relations with Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 68, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Quenoy, I. (2019) ‘Church and State in Ukraine and the Power Politics of Orthodox Christianity’, War on the Rocks, 14 February, available at: https://warontherocks.com/2019/02/church-and-state-in-ukraine-and-the-power-politics-of-orthodox-christianity/, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, P. (2000) Russian Messianism. Third Rome, Revolution, Communism and After (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• ECHR (2002) ‘Case of Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova’, European Court of Human Rights, 27 March, available at: https://www.legislationline.org/documents/id/4887, accessed 27 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, M. (2014) ‘Contemporary Russian Messianism and New Russian Foreign Policy’, Contemporary Security Policy, 35, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. (2002) ‘Forced Miracles: The Russian Orthodox Church and Postsoviet International Relations’, Religion, State & Society, 30, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Feklyunina, V. (2008) ‘Battle for Perceptions: Projecting Russia in the West’, Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feklyunina, V. (2012a) ‘Constructing Russophobia’, in Taras, R. (ed.) Russia’s Identity in International Relations. Images, Perceptions, and Misperceptions (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Feklyunina, V. (2012b) ‘Russia’s International Images and its Energy Policy. An Unreliable Supplier?’, Europe-Asia Studies, 64, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feklyunina, V. (2016) ‘Soft Power and Identity: Russia, Ukraine and the “Russian World(s)”’, European Journal of International Relations, 22, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2001) ‘Religion as an Overlooked Element of International Relations’, International Studies Review, 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. A. (1999) ‘Actors and Preferences in International Relations’, in Lake, D. A. & Powell, R. (eds) Strategic Choice and International Relations (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Greeley, A. (1994) ‘A Religious Revival in Russia?’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hast, S. (2018) Spheres of Influence in International Relations. History, Theory and Politics (Farnham, Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, J. (2009) ‘Religion and Foreign Policy’, in Haynes, J. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics (New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. (2018) ‘The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate as Potential “Tool” of Russian Soft Power in the Wake of Ukraine’s 2013 Euromaidan’, Europe-Asia Studies, 70, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1993) ‘If not Civilisations, What? Paradigms of the Post-Cold War World’, Foreign Affairs, 72, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York, NY, Simon & Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• Kharkovshchenko, Y. & Bortnikova, O. (2018) ‘Geopolitical Vector of Ukrainian Orthodoxy in the Context of National Security’, in Dingley, J. & Mollica, M. (eds) Understanding Religious Violence. Radicalism and Terrorism in Religion Explored via Six Case Studies (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• King, C. (1994) ‘Moldovan Identity and the Politics of Pan-Romanianism', Slavic Review, 53, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochan, N. (2016) ‘Shaping Ukrainian Identity: The Churches in the Socio-Political Crisis’, in Krawchuk, A. & Bremer, T. (eds) Churches in the Ukrainian Crisis (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Kolossov, V. & O’Loughlin, J. (1998) ‘Pseudo-States as Harbingers of a new Geopolitics: The Example of the Trans-Dniester Moldovan Republic (TMR)’, Geopolitics, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kornilov, A. & Makarychev, A. (2014) ‘Russia’s Soft Power in the South Caucasus. Discourses, Communication, Hegemony’, in Agadjanian, A., Jödicke, A. & van der Zweerde, E. (eds) Religion, Nation and Democracy in the South Caucasus (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Krawchuk, A. (2016) ‘Redefining Orthodox Identity in Ukraine After the Euromaidan’, in Krawchuk, A. & Bremer, T. (eds) Churches in the Ukrainian Crisis (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, U. (2018) ‘Preventing Escalation in the Baltics: A NATO Playbook’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Kuhn_Baltics_INT_final_WEB.pdf, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. (1997) ‘In Search of Unity and Autocephaly: Ukraine’s Orthodox Churches’, Religion, State and Society, 25, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. (2018) ‘Why Independence for Ukraine’s Orthodox Church is an Earthquake for Putin’, Atlantic Council, 10 September, available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-independence-for-ukraine-s-orthodox-church-is-an-earthquake-for-putin, accessed 20 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, V. & Saarelainen. (2017) Spirituality as a Political Instrument. The Church, the Kremlin, and the Creation of the ‘Russian World’, FIIA Working Paper 98 (Helsinki, Finish Institute of International Affairs), available at: https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/ws/portalfiles/portal/89607397/WP98_Russia.pdf, accessed 20 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2007) ‘Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics’, International Security, 32, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY, & London, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2017) ‘Hierarchy and International Relations: Theory and Evidence’, in Thompson, W. R. (ed.) The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. (2015) ‘The Russian World. Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination’, Center on Global Interests, 21 May, available at: http://globalinterests.org/2015/05/26/the-russian-world-russias-soft-power-and-geopolitical-imagination/, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Legvold, R. (2007) ‘Russian Foreign Policy During Periods of Great State Transformation’, in Legvold, R. (ed.) Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Leustean, L. N. (2011) ‘The Concept of Symphonia in Contemporary European Orthodoxy’, International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 11, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Leustean, L. N. (2017) ‘Eastern Orthodoxy, Geopolitics and the 2016 “Holy and Great Synod of the Orthodox Church”’, Geopolitics, 23, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leustean, L. N. (2018) ‘The Politics of Orthodox Churches in the European Union’, International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 18, 2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liik, K., Metodiev, M. & Popescu, N. (2019) ‘Defender of the Faith? How Ukraine’s Orthodox Split Threatens Russia’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 30 May, available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/defender_of_the_faith_how_ukraines_orthodox_split_threatens_russia/, accessed 12 April 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, B. (2002) Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era. Reality, Illusion and Mythmaking (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Lomagin, N. (2012) ‘Interest Groups in Russian Foreign Policy: The Invisible Hand of the Russian Orthodox Church’, International Politics, 49, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2004) Power: A Radical View (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Mádl, M. (2019) ‘Orthodox Church of Ukraine: Escalating Nation Building’, Ústav mezinárodníh vztahů, 4 February, available at: https://www.iir.cz/article/orthodox-church-of-ukraine-escalating-nation-building, accessed 29 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Makarkin, A. & Oppenheimer, P. M. (2011) ‘The Russian Social Contract and Regime Legitimacy’, International Affairs, 87, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. (2019) ‘Closed City Christians: Theopolitics of Canonical Territory in Post-Soviet Russia’, The Journal of Religion, 99, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzato, K. (2009) ‘Inter-Orthodox Relations and Transborder Nationalities in and Around Unrecognised Abkhazia and Transnistria’, Religion, State and Society, 37, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Matveychev, O. (2009) Suverenitet Dukha (Moscow, EKSMO).
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. (1948) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York, NY, Alfred A. Knopf).
   Google Scholar
• Munteanu, V. (2015) ‘Behind the Curtain: The Relationship between the Moldovan State and Church’, in Hug, A. (eds) Traditional Religion and Political Power: Examining the Role of the Church in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova (London, Foreign Policy Centre).
   Google Scholar
• Niebuhr, R. (1953) Christian Realism and Political Problems (New York, NY, Charles Scribner’s Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2002) The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower can’t go it Alone (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (Washington, DC, Public Affairs).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2008a) ‘Security and Smart Power’, American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2008b) ‘Smart Power and the “War on Terror”’, Asia Pacific Review, 15, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (2009) ‘Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power’, Foreign Affairs, 88, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohle, M., Cook, R. J., Han, Zh.-Y. & Mamazhanov, R. (2019) ‘Caught in the Middle: What is Bishkek’s Hedging Strategy’, Contemporary Eurasia, 8, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Østbø, J. (2016) The New Third Rome: Readings of a Russian Nationalist Myth (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pertsev, A. (2017) ‘President and Patriarch: what Putin wants from the Orthodox Church’, Carnegie Moscow Center, 19 December, available at: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/75058, accessed 30 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Petro, N. (2015) ‘Russia’s Orthodox Soft Power’, Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 23 March, available at: https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/articles_papers_reports/727, accessed 20 February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, M. (2020) ‘Russkiy mir: The Geopolitics of Russian Compatriots Abroad’, Geopolitics, 25, 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponomariov, A. (2019) ‘Ukrainian Church Autocephaly: The Redrawing of the Religious Borders and Political Identities in the Conflict between Ukraine and Russia’, Russian Analytical Digest, 231.
   Google Scholar
• Rap, M. (2015) ‘The Conflict between Traditional Christian Churches in Ukraine as a Conflict of Identities: Where to Search for the Prospects of Reconciliation? A Reflection in the Light of the Theories of Paul Ricoeur and John Paul Lederach’, Political Theology, 16, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogstad, A. (2018) ‘The Next Crimea? Getting Russia’s Transnistria Policy Right’, Problems of Post-Communism, 65, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohtmets, P. (2019) ‘The Autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Future of the Eastern Orthodox Church’, International Centre for Defence and Security, 1 March, available at: https://icds.ee/the-autocephaly-of-the-ukrainian-orthodox-church-and-the-future-of-the-eastern-orthodox-church/, accessed 20 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Roslycky, L. L. (2011) ‘Russia’s Smart Power in Crimea: Sowing the Seeds of Trust’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 11, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaru, V. (2018) ‘Forced Attraction?’, Problems of Post-Communism, 65, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, P. & Kazantsev, A. (2016) ‘The Limits of Russia’s “Soft Power”’, Journal of Political Power, 9, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryzhkov, V. (2015) ‘Russian Orthodox Church Facing Ukraine Split’, Moscow Times, 15 June, available at: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2015/06/15/russian-orthodox-church-facing-ukraine-split-a47389, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sergunin, A. & Karabeshkin, L. (2015) ‘Understanding Russia’s Soft Power Strategy’, Politics, 35, 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, M. K. (2012) ‘How does Religion Matter? Pathways to Religion in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 38, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorov, D. (2006) ‘Post-imperial Third Romes: Resurrections of a Russian Orthodox Geopolitical Metaphor’, Geopolitics, 11, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, G. (2015) ‘Perception of Russia’s Soft Power and Influence in the Baltic States’, Public Relations Review, 41, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solik, M. & Baar, V. (2019) ‘The Russian Orthodox Church: An Effective Religious Instrument of Russia’s Soft Power Abroad. The Case of Moldova’, Acta Politologica, 11, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Stan, L. & Turcescu L. (2000) ‘The Romanian Orthodox Church and Post-Communist Democratisation’, Europe-Asia Studies, 52, 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, S. (2019) ‘Autonomie der Orthodoxen Kirche der Ukraine als Politikum’, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 10 January, available at: https://www.swp-berlin.org/kurz-gesagt/2018/autonomie-der-orthodoxen-kirche-der-ukraine-als-politikum/, accessed 29 March 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Stronski, P. & Sokolsky, R. (2017) ‘The Return of Global Russia: An Analytical Framework’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 14 December, available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/12/14/return-of-global-russia-analytical-framework-pub-75003, accessed 23 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Suslov, M. (2015) ‘“Holy Rus”: The Geopolitical Imagination in the Contemporary Russian Orthodox Church’, Russian Social Science Review, 56, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Suslov, M. (2016) ‘The Russian Orthodox Church and the Crisis in Ukraine’, in Krawchuk, A. & Bremer, T. (eds) Churches in the Ukrainian Crisis (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Suslov, M. (2018) ‘“Russian World” Concept: Post-Soviet Geopolitical Ideology and the Logic of “Spheres of Influence”’, Geopolitics, 23, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. M. (2001) ‘Faith, History and Martin Wight: The Role of Religion in the Historical Sociology of the English School of International Relations’, International Affairs, 77, 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonoyan, L. S. & Payne, D. P. (2010) ‘The Visit of Patriarch Kirill to Ukraine in 2009 and its Significance in Ukraine’s Political and Religious Life’, Religion, State and Society, 38, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2001) The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border between Geopolitics and Globalization (Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2009a) ‘Russia’s Spheres of Interest, Not Influence’, The Washington Quarterly, 32, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2009b) ‘Russia Reborn—Reimagining Moscow’s Foreign Policy’, Foreign Affairs, 88, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2012) Post-imperium: evraziiskaya istoriya (Mocsow, Rosspen).
   Google Scholar
• Trenin, D. (2013) ‘Orthodox Diplomacy’, Carnegie Moscow Center, 26 July, available at: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/52501, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tumanov, S., Gasparishvili, A. & Romanova, E. (2011) ‘Russia–EU Relations, or How the Russians Really View the EU’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 27, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Verkhovsky, A. (2002) ‘The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in Nationalist, Xenophobic and Antiwestern Tendencies in Russia Today: Not Nationalism, but Fundamentalism’, Religion, State and Society, 30, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Vuving, A. (2009) ‘How Soft Power Works’, paper presented at the panel ‘Soft Power and Smart Power’, American Political Science Association, Toronto, 3 September.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. & Ludwig, J. (2017) ‘The Meaning of Sharp Power: How Authoritarian States Project Influence’, Foreign Affairs, 16 November, available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-11-16/meaning-sharp-power, accessed 11 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J. (2006) ‘The Religio-Political Strategies of the Russian Orthodox Church as a “Politics of Discourse”’, Religion, State and Society, 34, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J. (2008) ‘Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. L. (2017) ‘The Russian Pursuit of Regional Hegemony’, Rising Powers Quarterly, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, B. (2016) Asymmetry and International Relationships (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar