Trusting the Untrustworthy: An Exploration of Attitudes Towards the Populist Government in Poland Using Survey Data

References

• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A. (2014) ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaioannou, E. & Passari, E. (2017) ‘The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (1997) ‘Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems’, American Political Science Association, 99, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, H. (1996) ‘Strengths and Limitations of Ipsative Measurement’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, P. C., Barbera, P., Ackermann, K. & Venetz, A. (2017) ‘Is the Left–Right Scale a Valid Measure of Ideology? Individual-Level Variation in Associations with “Left” and “Right” and Left–Right Self-Placement’, Political Behavior, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, P. C. & Freitag, M. (2018) ‘Measuring Trust’, in Uslaner, E. M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A. & Tipton, S. M. (1985) Habits at Heart (Oakland, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. A. (2001) ‘How Can I Deal with Missing Data in My Study?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., Lenihan, D. G., Williams, J. & Young, W. (2001) Measuring Quality of Life: The Use of Societal Outcomes by Parliamentarians (Ottawa, Centre for Collaborative Government).
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, P., Thorgren, S. & Wincent, J. (2011) ‘Entrepreneurs Learning Together: The Importance of Building Trust for Learning and Exploiting Business Opportunities’, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijlsma-Frankema, K. & Costa, A. C. (2005) ‘Understanding the Trust–Control Nexus’, International Sociology, 20, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. & Walle, S. V. D. (2003) ‘Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. & Richardson, J. (1986) ‘The Forms of Capital’, in Hallinan, M. T. (ed.) The Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Goettingen, Otto Schartz & Co.).
   Google Scholar
• Bustikova, L. & Guasti, P. (2017) ‘The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe?’, Journal of Politics and Governance, 5, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Caillier, J. (2010) ‘Citizen Trust, Political Corruption, and Voting Behavior: Connecting the Dots’, Politics & Policy, 38, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, R. E. & Love, G. J. (2018) ‘Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 48, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelfranchi, C. & Falcone, R. (2010) ‘Social-Cognitive Model of Trust: Basic Ingredients’, in Castelfranchi, C. & Falcone, R. (eds) Trust Theory (Chichester, John Wiley and Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G. & Moreno, A. (2006) ‘The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawvey, M., Hayes, M., Canache, D. & Mondak, J. J. (2018) ‘Biological and Psychological Influences on Interpersonal and Political Trust’, in Uslaner, E. M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, D. (1998) ‘Client Satisfaction Measures: What Are Their Applications for Public Policy in Privatisation and Contracting Out?', paper presented at the International Conference of the Australasian Evaluation Society, Proceedings Volume 2, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A. & Osborne, J. W. (2005) ‘Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis’, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Curow, K. M. (2000) Populist Promises, Populist Threats: The Origins, Nature and Dynamics of Populism in Post-Communist Europe (College Park, MD, University of Maryland).
   Google Scholar
• Davidov, E. (2009) ‘Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Political Analysis, 17, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, D. (2011) ‘The Legitimacy of Political Institutions: Explaining Contemporary Populism in Latin America’, Comparative Political Studies, 44, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G. & Kubik, J. (2001) Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993 (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., Stępińska, A. & Hopmann, D. N. (2016) ‘Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives’, in Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J. & Vreese, C. H. (eds) Populist Political Communication in Europe (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1999) ‘Economics and Politics Revisited: Exploring the Decline in Conservative Support 1992–1995’, Political Studies, 47, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieschi, C. & Heywood, P. (2004) ‘Trust, Cynicism and Populist Anti-politics’, Journal of Political Legitimacies, 9, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, M. & Bauer, P. C. (2016) ‘Personality Traits and the Propensity to Trust Friends and Strangers’, The Social Science Journal, 53, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M., Bossert, D. & Stukowski, S. (2013) ‘Response Rate and Nonresponse Bias: Impact of the Number of Contact Attempts on Data Quality in the European Social Survey’, Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 117, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Guidorossi, G. & Svensson, P. (1995) ‘Support for the Democratic System’, in Klingemann, H. & Fuchs, D. (eds) Citizens and the State (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1996) Trust: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order (New York, NY, Simon and Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, A. (2010) ‘Understanding Unequal Turnout: Education and Voting in Comparative Perspective’, Electoral Studies, 29, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanville, J. L. & Paxton, P. (2007) ‘How Do We Learn to Trust? A Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis of the Sources of Generalized Trust’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greskovits, B. (1998) The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared (Budapest, Central European University).
   Google Scholar
• Grogan, C. M. (2019) ‘The Sources and Consequences of Distrust of Government’, Social Service Review, 93, 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund, K. & Setala, M. (2007) ‘Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout’, Comparative European Politics, 5, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Herrera, H., Morelli, M. & Sonno, T. (2017) Populism: Demand and Supply, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11871 (Paris, Centre for Economic Policy Research).
   Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2010) Civic Capital as the Missing Link (Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research).
   Google Scholar
• Harder, J. & Krosnick, J. (2008) ‘Why Do People Vote? A Psychological Analysis of the Causes of Voter Turnout’, Journal of Social Issues, 64, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2006) Trust (Cambridge, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hofferbert, R. I. & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000) Democracy and its Discontents in Post-Wall Germany, USB Koln Working Paper (Berlin, WZB).
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., Marien, S. & Pauwels, T. (2011) ‘Where Do Distrusting Voters Turn if There Is No Viable Exit or Voice Option? The Impact of Political Trust on Electoral Behaviour in the Belgian Regional Elections of June 2009’, Government and Opposition, 46, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. & Catterberg, G. (2003) ‘Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43, 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. F. & Norris, P. (2016) Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash, HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026 (Cambridge, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government).
   Google Scholar
• Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R. & Eva, G. (2007) Measuring Attitudes Crossnationally. Lessons from the European Social Survey (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Kaase, M., Newton, K. & Scarbrough, E. (1997) ‘Beliefs in Government’, Journal of Politics, 17, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminska, O. & Lynn, P. (2017) ‘Survey-Based Cross-Country Comparisons Where Countries Vary in Sample Design: Issues and Solutions’, Journal of Official Statistics, 33, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmis, D. & Rocher, F. (2018) Trust, Distrust, and Mistrust in Multinational Democracies: Comparative Perspectives (Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kazimierczuk, A. (2016) ‘Petru: Tusk zdradził swój elektorat’, Rzeczpospolita, 30 January.
   Google Scholar
• Khalitova, L., Myslika, B., Turska-Kawab, A. & Kiousisa, S. T. S. (2020) ‘He Who Pays the Piper, Calls the Tune? Examining Russia’s and Poland’s Public Diplomacy Efforts to Shape the International Coverage of the Smolensk Crash’, Public Relations Review, 46, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielczewska, M. & Brandt, N. (2018) The ‘Family 500+’ Child Allowance and Female Labour Supply in Poland (Paris, OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2021) Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrad Four (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Koch, I. (2016) ‘Bread and Butter Politics: Democratic Disenchantment and Everyday Politics on an English Council Estate’, American Ethnologist, 43, 2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg, A. (2005) ‘Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Perspectives on Politics, 3, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kotwas, M. & Kubik, J. (2019) ‘Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland’, East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 33, 2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. & Frey, T. (2006) ‘Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared’, European Journal of Political Research, 45, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzymowski, M. (2017) ‘Jarosław Kaczyński: Jesteście kanaliami’, Newsweek, 23 July.
   Google Scholar
• Krzyżanowski, M. (2020) ‘Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism’, Social Semiotics, 30, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, A. (2021) ‘Between Cooperation and Competition Electoral Alliances of the Parliamentary Opposition in Poland During the 2018–2019 Series of Three Election’, Czech Journal of Political Science, 28, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932) ‘A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes’, Archives of Psychology, 140.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J. (2012) ‘Why Feed the Hand That Bites You? Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and System Support in Post-Communist Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 51, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipiński, A. & Stępińska, A. (2019) ‘Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media: Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media’, Problems of Post-Communism, 66, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listhaug, O. (1995) ‘Confidence in Political and Private Institutions’, in Klingemann, H. D. & Fuchs, D. (eds) Citizens and the State (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, P. C. (2014) ‘Government Effectiveness and Support for Democracy’, European Journal of Political Research, 53, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcinkiewicz, K. & Stegmaier, M. (2016) ‘The Parliamentary Election in Poland, October 2015’, Electoral Studies, 41, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (2018) ‘Creating Authoritarian Clientelism: Poland After 2015’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski, R. (2020) ‘Plurality Support for Democratic Decay: The 2019 Polish Parliamentary Election’, West European Politics, 43, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. & Listhaug, O. (1999) ‘Political Performance and Institutional Trust’, in Norris, P. (ed.) Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Government (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. S. & Mitamura, T. (2003) ‘Are Surveys on Trust Trustworthy?’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2001) ‘What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, 34, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013) ‘Populism’, in Freeden, M. & Stears, M. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (1999) ‘Social and Political Trust in Establishes Democracies’, in Norris, P. (ed.) Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Government (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (2001) ‘Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy’, International Political Science Review, 22, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. (2011) Causal Inference for Binary Regression, available at: https://www.stata.com/meeting/chicago11/materials/chi11_nichols.pdf, accessed 19 September 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Paldam, M. & Svendsen, G. T. (2000) ‘Missing Social Capital and the Transition in Eastern Europe’, Journal of Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. (1995) ‘Introducing the Topic’, in Peters, G. B. & Savoie, D. J. (eds) Governance in a Changing Environment (Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G. & Tucker, J. A. (2020) ‘Communist Legacies and Left-Authoritarianism’, Comparative Political Studies, 53, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C. & Taggart, P. (2019) The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe, available at: www.popu-list.org, accessed 20 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1962) ‘The Association Between Self-Esteem and Anxiety’, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1, 2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. & Shah, D. V. (2000) ‘Personality Strength and Social Capital: The Role of Dispositional and Informational Variables in the Production of Civic Participation’, Communication Research Journal, 27, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Siemsen, P. (2020) ‘Voting PiS: Voting Left when Voting Far-Right Populist?’, Polish Political Science Review, 8, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, B. (2017) ‘Populism in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Espejo, P. O. & Ostiguy, P. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Populism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Stoop, I., Billiet, J., Koch, A. & Fitzgerald, R. (2010) Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey (Chichester, John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Tawfik, A. & Oesch, D. (2015) Script to Construct an Indicator of Social Class in the ESS, available at: https://people.unil.ch/danieloesch/files/2014/05/Description_SocialClassPackage_ESS_26Nov2015.pdf, accessed 2 December 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, J. J. & van der Kolk, H. (2009) ‘Effectiveness and Political Support in Old and New Democracies’, in Klingemann, H. D. (ed.) The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2004) Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications (Washington, DC, American Psychological Association).
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2018) ‘The Study of Trust’, in Uslaner, E. M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. W. G. (2017) ‘Political Trust and the “Crisis of Democracy”’, in Thompson, W. R. (ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, S. T. (2011) Supply and Demand: Identifying Populist Parties in Europe and Explaining their Electoral Performance, PhD thesis (Brighton, University of Sussex).
   Google Scholar
• Vougiouklis, T. & Kambaki-Vougioukli, P. (2011) ‘On the Use of the Bar’, China–USA Business Review, 10, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (1999) ‘Conclusion’, in Warren, M. (ed.) Democracy and Trust (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weil, F. (1989) ‘The Sources and Structure of Legitimation in Western Democracies: A Consolidated Model Tested with Time-Series Data in Six Countries Since World War II’, American Sociological Review, 54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001) ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’, Comparative Politics, 34, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge, MA, MIT).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (1992) Governance and Development (Washington, DC, The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., Liu, H. & Li, H. (2017) ‘Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study’, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. & Newton, K. (2008) ‘Social Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żuk, P., Pluciński, P. & Żuk, P. (2021) ‘The Dialectic of Neoliberal Exploitation and Cultural-Sexual Exclusion: From Special Economic Zones to LGBT-Free Zones in Poland’, Antipode, 53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar