The End of Russian Hegemony in the Post-Soviet Space? War in Ukraine and Disintegration Processes in Eurasia

References

• Acharya, A. (2020) ‘The Myth of the “Civilisation State”: Rising Powers and the Cultural Challenge to World Order’, Ethics & International Affairs, 34, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, W. (1987) ‘Gramsci and the Politics of Civil Society’, Praxis International, 7, 3/4.
   Google Scholar
• Aleprete, M. (2011) ‘Competing Visions of the International System: Role-Identity Incommensurability and US–Russian Relations’, Russian History, 38, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althusser, L. (1971) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (New York, NY, Monthly Review Press).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. (2017) The H-Word: The Peripeteia of Hegemony (London, Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Avdaliani, E. (2023) ‘Central Asia and the South Caucasus Draw Closer Together’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 6 October, available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/90731, accessed 17 February 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Balanchuk, I. (2023) ‘Lukashenko Devoted Half of his Address to War in Ukraine and Need for Negotiations’, Ukrainska Pravda, 31 March, available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/03/31/7395856/, accessed 10 February 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Bartmanski, D. (2011) ‘Successful Icons of Failed Time: Rethinking Post-Communist Nostalgia’, Acta Sociologica, 54, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, S. (2008) ‘Theorising Today: The Post-Soviet Condition’, The Log, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. (1991) ‘New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century’, International Affairs, 67, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, C. & Moran, J. (2000) ‘Imagining Communities in Central Asia: Nationalism and Interstate Affect in the Post-Soviet Era’, Asian Affairs: An American Review, 26, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Cheskin, A. & Kachuyevski, A. (2020) The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Post-Soviet Space: Language, Politics and Identity (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, G. (2022) ‘Russian Thinking About CSTO Peacekeeping: Central Asia, China, and the Ukraine War’, ASAN Forum, 11 May, available at: https://theasanforum.org/russian-thinking-about-csto-peacekeeping-central-asia-china-and-the-ukraine-war/, accessed 15 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Colpani, G. (2022) ‘Two Theories of Hegemony: Stuart Hall and Ernesto Laclau in Conversation’, Political Theory, 50, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (1996) Approaches to World Order (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Denitch, B. (1978) ‘Eurocommunism: A Threat to Soviet Hegemony?’, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 33, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Deyermond, R. (2009) ‘Matrioshka Hegemony? Multi-Levelled Hegemonic Competition and Security in Post-Soviet Central Asia’, Review of International Studies, 35, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. (1986) Empire (Ithaca, NY, & London, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. & Holmes, L. (2002) Post-Communist Democratisation: Political Discourses Across Thirteen Countries (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, M. (2022) ‘Echo of Empire: Why Russia’s War on Ukraine Troubles All Post-Soviet Countries’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 15 March, available at: https://ecfr.eu/article/echo-of-empire-why-russias-war-on-ukraine-troubles-all-post-soviet-countries/, accessed 10 February 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Femia, J. (1981) Gramsci’s Political Thought (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fowkes, B. (2002) Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Gayoso, C. (2009) ‘Russian Hegemonies: Historical Snapshots, Regional Security and Changing Forms of Russia’s Role in the Post-Soviet Region’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman, C. (1981) ‘Self-Determination and the Soviet Empire’, World Affairs, 144, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Goshulak, G. (2003) ‘Soviet and Post-Soviet: Challenges to the Study of Nation and State Building’, Ethnicities, 3, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2011a) Prison Notebooks, Vol. 2 (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2011b) Prison Notebooks, Vol. 3 (New York, NY, Columbia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, S. (2005) ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. (2005) ‘Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia’, World Politics, 58, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. (2015) ‘Forced to Friendship? Russian (Mis-)Understandings of Soft Power and the Implications for Audience Attraction in Ukraine’, Politics, 35, 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamova, N. (2022) ‘Central Asian Countries Tread Cautiously on Russia’s War in Ukraine’, Voice of America, 1 March, available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/central-asian-states-tread-cautiously-on-russia-s-war-in-ukraine/6465144.html, accessed 8 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ishchenko, V. (2021) ‘Ukraine in the Vicious Circle of the Post-Soviet Crisis of Hegemony’, LeftEast, 29 October, available at: https://lefteast.org/ukraine-in-the-vicious-circle-of-the-post-soviet-crisis-of-hegemony/, accessed 2 January 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (1977) ‘Soviet Hegemony in Eastern Europe: The Dynamics of Political Autonomy and Military Intervention’, World Politics, 29, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozłowski, K. (2016) ‘Color Revolutions, Frozen Conflicts and the New Silk Road: The Political Struggle in the Post-Soviet Space’, Politeja, 41.
   Google Scholar
• Krancberg, S. (1986) ‘Common Sense and Philosophy in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks’, Studies in East European Thought, 32, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kulyk, V. (2001) ‘The Politics of Ethnicity in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Beyond Brubaker’, Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 26, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London & New York, NY, Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2020) ‘Contemporary Russian Messianism Under Putin and Russian Foreign Policy in Ukraine and Syria’, Slavonic and East European Review, 98, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2012) Theory of Society, Vol. 1 (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power: Volume 1. A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2001) The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939 (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, A. (2013) The New Russian Foreign Policy Concept: Evolving Continuity (London, Chatham House).
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. (1990) ‘Soft Power’, Foreign Policy, 80, Autumn.
   Google Scholar
• Orlans, H. (1996) ‘Edward Shils’ Beliefs About Society and Sociology’, Minerva, 34, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa, C. (2003) ‘On Hegemony, Post-Ideology and Subalternity’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. (1998) Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Plokhy, S. (2014) The Last Empire: The Final Days of the Soviet Union (New York, NY, Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, G. (1994) ‘Subaltern Studies as Postcolonial Criticism’, American Historical Review, 99, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Rhamey, P., Slobodchikoff, M. & Volgy, T. (2015) ‘Order and Disorder Across Geopolitical Space: The Effect of Declining Dominance on Interstate Conflict’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigi, J. (2007) ‘The War in Chechnya: The Chaotic Mode of Domination, Violence and Bare Life in the Post-Soviet Context’, Critique of Anthropology, 27, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romashko, T. (2018) ‘Biopolitics and Hegemony in Contemporary Russian Cultural Policy’, Russian Politics, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rudkouski, P. (2021) ‘Russia’s Cultural Leverage in Belarus’, New Perspectives, 29, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. (2023) ‘Crisis of the International System and International Politics’, Russia in Global Affairs, 21, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, R. (2019) Russia, BRICS, and the Disruption of Global Order (Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. (1982) The Constitution of Society (Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Silvius, R. (2014) ‘The Russian State, Eurasianism, and Civilisations in the Contemporary Global Political Economy’, Journal of Global Faultlines, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Skladanowski, M. & Borzecki, L. (2020) ‘Radical Russianness: The Religious and Historiosophic Context of Aleksandr Dugin’s Anti-Occidentalism’, Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 14, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Slobodchikoff, M. (2017) ‘Challenging US Hegemony: The Ukrainian Crisis and Russian Regional Order’, Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 44.
   Google Scholar
• Standish, R. (2022) ‘Ukraine War a New Test for Chinese Power Across Eurasia’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 1 May, available at: https://www.rferl.org/a/china-russia-ukraine-war-power-eurasia-sco-/31829145.html, accessed 13 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Suny, R. (2017) ‘The Empire That Dared Not Speak Its Name’, Current History, 116, 792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szostek, J. (2018) ‘The Mass Media and Russia’s “Sphere of Interests”: Mechanisms of Regional Hegemony in Belarus and Ukraine’, Geopolitics, 23, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. (2018) ‘Refiguring the Subaltern’, Political Theory, 46, 6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishkov, V. (1991) ‘The Soviet Empire Before and After Perestroika’, Theory and Society, 20, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations (2022) ‘Aggression Against Ukraine: Resolution / Adopted by the General Assembly’, United Nations Digital Library, 2 March, available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3959039, accessed 10 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2023) ‘UN General Assembly Calls for Immediate End to War in Ukraine’, UN News, 23 February, available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/02/1133847, accessed 24 February 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. (1976) ‘Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis’, Theory and Society, 3, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wawrzonek, M. (2014) ‘Ukraine in the “Gray Zone”: Between the “Russkiy Mir” and Europe’, East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures, 28, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2017) ‘The Russian Pursuit of Regional Hegemony’, Rising Powers Quarterly, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Worth, O. (2005) Hegemony, International Political Economy, and Post-Communist Russia (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Zaporozhchenko, R. (2021) ‘Rethinking the Arab Spring in the Context of Geohistorical Transformations’, Ideology and Politics Journal, 3, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Zaporozhchenko, R. (2023a) ‘“Shadow of the Empire”: Rethinking Russian Imperial Sovereignty in the Context of the War Against Ukraine, 2022’, Russian Politics, 8, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Zaporozhchenko, R. (2023b) ‘The End of “Putin’s Empire”? Ontological Problems of Russian Imperialism in the Context of the War against Ukraine, 2022’, Problems of Post-Communism, available online first at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2022.2158873, accessed 10 November 2023.
   Google Scholar