Learning conversations: teacher researchers evaluating dialogic strategies in early years settings

References

• Alexander, R. 2004. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Bilton, H. 2012. “The Type and Frequency of Interactions that Occur between Staff and Children Outside in Early Years Foundation Stage Settings during a Fixed Playtime Period When There Are Tricycles Available.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2012.704763.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., and J. Blase. 2004. Handbook of Instructional Leadership – How Successful Principals Promote Teaching and Learning. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, P. 2014. “Learning Teaching in School.” In Professional Studies in Primary Education. 2nd ed., edited by CooperHilary Cooper, 267–288. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, P., and S. Bloxham. 2014. “A Situative Metaphor for Teacher Learning: The Case of University Tutors Learning to Grade Student Coursework.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 337–352. doi:10.1002/berj.3082.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P. 2008. “Research and Evidence-informed Practice: Focusing on Practice and Practitioners.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (1): 37–52. doi:10.1080/03057640801889964.
   Google Scholar
• Crichton, H. 2013. “Production and Reception Formats: An Alternative Participation Framework for Analysis of Classroom Discourse?” British Educational Research Journal 39 (1): 166–181. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.615387.
   Google Scholar
• Damhuis, R., and A. De Blauw, 2008. “High Quality Interaction in the Classroom: A Focus for Professional Learning.” L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature 8 (4): 107–126. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-713-4_15.
   Google Scholar
• DCSF. 2008a. The Bercow Report. London: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• DCSF. 2008b. Every Child a Talker: Guidance for Lead Practitioners. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• DCSF. 2009. Every Child a Talker: Guidance for Consultants and Early Language Lead Practitioners. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. 2007. Guidelines for Video Research in Education: Recommendations from an Expert Panel. Chicago: Data Research and Development Center (NORC at the University of Chicago). Accessed May 14. http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research.html.
   Google Scholar
• Drie, J., and R. Dekker. 2013. “Theoretical Triangulation as an Approach for Revealing the Complexity of Classroom Discussion.” British Educational Research Journal 39 (2): 338–360. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.652069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., and Wood, E. 2012. “Changing Educational Practice in the Early Years through Practitioner-led Action Research: An Adult-Child Interaction Project.” International Journal of Early Years Education 20 (2): 114–129. doi:10.1080/09669760.2012.715400.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. 2008. A Teacher’s Guide to Practitioner Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. 2011. “Mobilising Research Knowledge in Education.” London Review of Education 9 (1): 15–26. doi:10.1080/14748460.2011.550431.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. 2013. “To Know Is Not Enough: Research Knowledge and Its Use.” Review of Education 1 (1): 2–31. doi:10.1002/rev3.3001.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. 2002. Discourse Analysis for language teachers. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2008. “Developing Dialogues.” In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, edited by G. Wells and G. Claxton, 141–153. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., T. Jung, and I. Walter. 2008. “The Many Forms of Research-informed Practice: A Framework for Mapping Diversity.” Cambridge Journal of Education 38 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1080/03057640801889980.
   Google Scholar
• Osipova, A., B. Prichard, A. G. Boardman, M. T. Kiely, and P. Carroll. 2011. “Refocusing the Lens: Enhancing Elementary Special Education Reading Instruction through Video Self-reflection.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 26 (3): 158–171. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00335.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainbird, H., A. Fuller, and A. Munro. 2004. Workplace Learning in Context. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. 2006. “‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and Classroom Conversation.” Applied Linguistics 27 (1): 51–77. doi:10.1093/applin/ami041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. 1987. The Reflective Practitioner; How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. 1998. “On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One.” Educational Researcher, 27 (2): 4–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X027002004.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., K. Sylva, S. Muttock, R. Gilden, and D. Bell. 2003. Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years. London: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tizard, B., and M. Hughes. 1984. Young Children learning: Talking and Thinking at Home and at School. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Wadensjo, C. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S., and R. Flewitt. 2010. “New Technologies, New Multimodal Literacy Practices and Young Children’s Metacognitive Development.” Cambridge Journal of Education 40 (4): 387–399. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2010.526589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. 1998. “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, edited by C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe, 87–106. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar