More? Great? Childcare? A discourse analysis of two recent social policy documents relating to the care and education of young children in England

References

• Anthony, L. 2009. “Issues in the Design and Development of Software Tools for Corpus Studies: The Case for Collaboration.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, edited by P. Baker, 87–104. London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, L. 2013a. “A Critical Look at Software Tools in Corpus Linguistics.” Linguistics Research 30 (2): 141–161. doi: 10.17250/khisli.30.2.201308.001
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, L. 2013b. “ AntConc 3.2.4w Programme.” http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/antconc_index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeze, R. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis and its Critics.” Pragmatics 21 (4): 493–525. doi: 10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T. 2011. “Succession Planning In England: New Leaders and New Forms of Leadership.” School Leadership and Management 31 (3): 181–198. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2010.545383
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2012. “ The Nutbrown Review: Foundations for Quality: The Independent Review of Early Education and Childcare Qualifications.” DFE-00068 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175463/Nutbrown-Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2013. “ More Great Childcare: Raising Quality and Giving Parents More Choice.” DFE-00002-2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/219660/More_20Great_20Childcare_20v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P. 2007. “What are Nurseries For? The Concept of Primary Task and its Application in Differentiating Roles and Tasks in Nurseries.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 5 (2): 169–188. doi: 10.1177/1476718X07076727
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., and N. Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and Discourse on Language. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. 2008. “The Interface between Childcare, Family Support and Child Poverty Strategies under New Labour: Tensions and Contradictions.” Social Policy and Society 7 (4): 479–494. doi: 10.1017/S1474746408004442
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. 2012. “The Marketisation of Early Years Education and Childcare in England.” In Policy Issues in the Early Years, edited by L. Miller and D. Hevey, 107–122. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E., and E. Hallet. 2010. “Professionalising the Early Childhood Workforce in England: Work in Progress or Missed Opportunity?” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 11 (1): 75–88. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.75
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. 2008. “Developing Professionalism within a Regulatory Framework in England: Challenges and Possibilities.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 16 (2): 255–268. doi: 10.1080/13502930802141667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, P. 2003. Beyond Caring: The Case for Reforming the Childcare and Early Years Workforce. London: Daycare Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, J., ed. 2007. Attachment Relationships: Quality of Care for Young Children. Milton Keynes: Open University and The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, J. 2011. Narratives from the Nursery: Negotiating Professional Identities in Early Childhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, H. 2011. “Gambling on the Market: The Role of For-profit Provision in Early Childhood Education and Care.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 9 (2): 150–161. doi: 10.1177/1476718X10387999
   Google Scholar
• Penn, H. 2013. “Childcare Markets: Do they Work?” In Childcare Markets: Can They Deliver an Equitable Service? edited by E. Lloyd and H. Penn, 19–43. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silberfeld, C. H., and K. Horsley. 2013. “The Early Years Foundation Stage Curriculum in England: A Missed Opportunity?” In The Early Years Curriculum: The UK Context and Beyond, edited by L. Ang, 12–32. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tenorio, E. H. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis: An Overview.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 10 (1): 183–210.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, M. 2010. “Rethinking Professionalism in Early Childhood: Untested Feasibilities and Critical Ecologies.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 11 (1): 1–7. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.1
   Google Scholar
• (UNCRC) United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, United Nations Children's Fund, and Bernard Van Leer Foundation. 2005. A Guide to General Comment 7: Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood. The Hague: Bernard Van Leer Foundation. http://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/files/Guide_to_GC7.pdf.
   Google Scholar