The effect of soil type and farm size on the variability of weed infestation in maize (Zea mays L.) fields in the south-west region of Poland

References

• Andreasen C, Streibig JC. 2011. Evaluation of changes in weed flora in arable fields of Nordic countries – based on Danish long-term surveys. Weed Res. 51:214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altop EK, Mennan H. 2011. Genetic and morphologic diversity of Echinochloa crus-galli populations from different origins. Phytoparasitica. 39:93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batlla D, Benech-Arnold RL. 2007. Predicting changes in dormancy level in weed seed soil banks: implications for weed management. Crop Prot. 26:189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvenuti C. 2007. Natural weed seed burial: effect of soil texture, rain and seed characteristics. Seed Sci Res. 3:211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshaw RE, Harker KN, O'Donovan TJ, Beckie HJ, Smith EG. 2008. Ongoing development of integrated weed management systems on the Canadian prairies. Weed Sci. 56:146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardina J, Herms CP, Doohan DJ. 2002. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Sci. 50:448–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office. 2014. Statistical yearbook of agriculture. Warszawa: Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Decision 85/377/EEC. 1985. Establishing a community typology for agricultural holdings. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31985D0377
   Google Scholar
• Demjanová E, Macák M, Dalović I, Majerník F, Týr Š, Smatana J. 2009. Effects of tillage systems and crop rotation on weed density, weed species composition and weed biomass in maize. Agron Res. 7:785–792.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman JA, Mortensen DA, Buhler DD, Ferguson RB. 2000. Identifying associations among site properties and weed species abundance. II. Hypothesis generation. Weed Sci. 48:576–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dille JA, Mortensen DA, Young LJ. 2002. Predicting weed species occurrence based on site properties and previous year's weed presence. Precis Agric. 3:193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Głowacka A. 2011. Dominant weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation and their competitiveness under conditions of various methods of weed control. Acta Agrobot. 64:119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gołębiowska H. 2011. Diversity of weed infestation depending on maize cropping system. Acta Sci Pol Agric. 10:13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman LA. 1978. Analysing qualitative/categorical data: Log-linear models and latent structure analysis. In: Magidson J, editor. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books; p. 471–473.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes C, Squire GR, Hallett PD, Watson CA, Young M. 2010. Arable plant communities as indicator of farming practice. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 138:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Appl Stat. 23:340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunková E, Winkler J, Demjanová E. 2011. The weed seed bank assessment in two soil depths under various mineral fertilising. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun. 59:105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Keller M, Böhringer N, Möhring J, Rueda-Ayala V, Gutjahr C, Gerhards R. 2014. Long-term changes in weed occurrence, yield and use of herbicides in maize in south-western Germany, with implications for the determination of economic thresholds. Weed Res. 54:457–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knežević M, Durkić M, Knežević I, Lončarić Z. 2003. Effects of pre- and post-emergence weed control on weed population and maize yield in different tillage systems. Plant Soil Environ. 49:223–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer RJ, Jiaimei L. 2003. Developing weed-suppressive soils through improved soil quality management. Soil Till Res. 72:193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf MJ, Spitters CJT, Schnieders BJ, Joenje W, de Groot W. 1992. An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. II. Model evaluation. Weed Res. 32:451–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman M, Davis AS. 2000. Integration of soil, crops and weed management in low external-input farming system. Weed Res. 40:27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lötjönen T, Mikkola H. 2000. Three mechanical weed control techniques in spring cereals. Agr Food Sci Finland. 9:269–278.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison AS, Black MM, Lowe CR, Macmahon B, Yuasa S. 1973. Some international differences in histology and survival in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 11:261–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkoa R, Owen MDK, Swanton CJ. 2015. Weed abundance, distribution, diversity, and community analyses. Weed Sci. 63:64–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusz W, Pląskowska E, Weber R, Kita W. 2015. Assessing the abundance of airborne fungi in a Dairy Cattle Barn. Pol J Environ Stud. 24:241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Kropáč Z, Chytrý M, Wild J, Tichý L. 2005. Effects of abiotic factors on species richness and cover in Central European weed communities. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 109:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghloo A, Asghari J, Ghaderi-Far F. 2013. Seed germination and seedling emergence of Velvelleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Planta-Daninha. 31:259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekutowski T. 2009. Soil type and soil store seed bank. Prog Plant Prot. 49:1379–1382. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Swanton CJ, Mahoney KJ, Chandler K, Gulden RH. 2008. Integrated weed management: knowledge-based weed management systems. Weed Sci. 56:168–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton CJ, Nkoa R, Blackshaw RE. 2015. Experimental methods for crop-weed competitions studies. Weed Sci. 63:2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabi Tataw J, Hall R, Ziss E, Schwarz T, von Hohberg und Buchwald C, Formayer H, Hosch J, Baumgarten A, Berthold H, Michel K, Zaller JG. 2014. Soil types will alter the response of arable agroecosystems to future rainfall patterns. Ann Applied Biol. 164:35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver SE, McWilliams EL. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 44. Amaranthus retrofl exus L., A. powellii S. Wats. and A. hybridus L. Can J Plant Sci. 60:1215–1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber R, Bortniak M, Gołębiowska H. 2011. Log-linear and correspondence analysis of variability of weed infestation of several winter wheat cultivars in relation to tillage system and preceding crop stubble height. J Plant Prot Res. 51:399–404.
   Google Scholar
• Yao S, Lan H, Zhang F. 2010. Variation of seed heteromorphism in Chenopodium album and the effect of salinity stress on the descendants. Ann Bot. 105:1015–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar