Short term effects of Bacillus thuringiensis and diflubenzuron aerial applications on non-target arthropods in a Mediterranean Forest

References

• Berger P, Hauxwell C, Murray D. 2007. Nucleopolyhedrovirus introduction in Australia. Virol Sin. 22:173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Birch ANE, Begg GS, Squire GR. 2011. How agro-ecological research helps to address food security issues under new IPM and pesticide reduction policies for global crop production systems. J Experi Botany. 62:3251–3261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanowicz SM, Mastro V C, Prasher DC, Harrison RG. 1997. Microsatellite DNA variation among Asian and North American gypsy moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Systematics. 90:768–775.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanowicz SM, Schaefer PW, Harrison RG. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA variation among worldwide populations of gypsy moths, Lymantria dispar. Mol Phylogen Evol. 15(3):487–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler L, Kondo V. 1993. Impact of Dimilin on non-target Lepidoptera: results of an operational gypsy moth suppression program at Coopers Rock State Forest, West Virginia. In West Virginia University, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, College of Agriculture and Forestry. 710.
   Google Scholar
• Butler L, Chrislip GA, Kondo VA, Townsend EC. 1997. Effect of diflubenzuron on non-target canopy arthropods in closed, deciduous watersheds in a Central Appalachian forest. J Econ Entomol. 90(3):784–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess EPJ, Barraclough EI, Kean AM, Markwick NP, Malone LA. 2015. Responses of 9 lepidopteran species to Bacillus thuringiensis: How useful is phylogenetic relatedness for selecting surrogate species for nontarget arthropod risk assessment? Insect Sci. 22(6):803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell RW, Sloan RJ. 1977. Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. For Sci Monogr. 19:34.
   Google Scholar
• Collins S. 1961. Benefits to understory from canopy defoliation by gypsy moth larvae. Ecology. 42(4):836–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corso IC, Gazzoni D, Nery ME. 1999. Efeito de doses e de refúgio sobre a seletividade de inseticidas a predadores e parasitóides de pragas de soja. Pesq Agropec Bras. 34(9):1529–1538.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson CB, Gottschalk KW, Johnson JE. 1999. Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States: a review. For Sci. 45:74–94.
   Google Scholar
• Eisler R. 1992. Diflubenzuron hazards to fish, wildlife and invertebrates: a synoptic review. PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER LAUREL MD.
   Google Scholar
• Elkinton J, Healy W, Buonaccorsi J, Boettner G, Hazzard A, Smith H. 1996. Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecol. 77(8):2332–2342.
   Google Scholar
• Emmet BJ, Archer BM. 1980. The toxicity of Diflubenzuron to honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in apple orchards. Plant Pathol. 29:177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajvan MA, Wood JM. 1996. Stand structure and development after gypsy moth defoliation in the Appalachian Plateau. For Ecol Manage. 59:79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer SA, Hall LW. 1992. Environmental concentrations and aquatic toxicity data on Diflubenzuron (Dimilin). Crit Rev Toxicol. 22(1):45–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glare TR, Caradus J, Gelernter W, Jackson T, Keyhani N, Kohl J, Marrone P, Morin L, Stewart A. 2012. Have biopesticides come of age? Trends Biotechnol. 30(5):250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk KW. MacFarlane RW. 1993. Photographic guide to crown condition of oaks: use for gypsy moth silviculture. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-168. Radnor, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p., 168.
   Google Scholar
• Grace JR. 1986. The influence of gypsy moth on the composition and nutrient content of litter fall in a Pennsylvania oak forest. For Sci. 32:855–870.
   Google Scholar
• Grosscourt AC. 1977. Diflubenzuron: Some aspects of its ovicidal and larvicidal mode of action and an evaluation of its practical possibilities. Pest Manage Sci. 9 (5):373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Grosscourt AC, Jongsma B. 1987. Mode of action and insecticidal properties of diflubenzuron. In: Wright JE and Renakan A, editors. Chitin and benzoyphenyl ureas. New York: Plenum Press; p. 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Ibañez-Justicia A, Martínez Gonzalvo M, Perez-Laorga Arias E. 2007. Distribución y abundancia de Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) en las principales masas de carrasca Quercus ilex (L.) subsp. rotundifolia (Lam.) y alcornoque Quercus suber (L.) de la Comunitat Valenciana. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal-Plagas. 33(4):491–502.
   Google Scholar
• Kang TH, Han SH, Lee HS. 2017. Genetic structure and demographic history of Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) in its area of origin and adjacent areas. Ecol Evol. 7(21):9162–9178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS. 2015. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future. J Invert Pathol. 132:1–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken A, Lillicrap A, Langford K. 2015. Benzoylurea pesticides used as veterinary medicines in aquaculture: Risks and developmental effects on nontarget crustaceans. Environ Toxicol Chem. 34(7):1533–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderino R, Crist TO, Haynes KJ. 2014. Lepidoptera‐specific insecticide used to suppress gypsy moth outbreaks may benefit non‐target forest Lepidoptera. Agr Forest Entomol. 16(4):359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinat PJ, Jennings DT, Whitmore RC. 1993. Effects of diflubenzuron on the litter spider and orthopteroid community in a central Appalachian forest infested with gypsy-moth (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae). Environ Entomol. 22(5):1003–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejmanová J, Cvačka J, Hrdý I, Kuldová J, Mertelík J, Muck A, Nešněrová P, Svatoš A. 2006. Residues of diflubenzuron on horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) leaves and their efficacy against the horse chestnut leafminer, Cameraria ohridella. Pest Manag Sci. 62(3):274–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell JK, Hannam JJ, Steinkraus DC. 2010. Conservation biological control using fungal entmopathogens. BioControl. 55(1):187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogue MG, Schaefer PW. 2007. A review of selected species of Lymantria Hübner [1819] including three new species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Lymantriinae). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team.
   Google Scholar
• Ponge JF. 1983. Les collemboles, indicateurs du type d´humus en milieu forestier. Résultats obtenus au Sud de Paris. Acta Oecol Oecol Generale. 4:359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Perry WB, Christiansen TA, Perry SA. 1997. Response of soil and leaf litter microarthropods to forest application of diflubenzuron. Ecotoxicol. 6(2):87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieske LK, Buss LJ. 2001. Effects of gypsy moth suppression tactics on litter- and ground-dwelling arthropods in the central hardwood forests of the Cumberland Plateau. Forest Ecology Manage. 149(1–3):181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample BE, Butler L, Whitmore RC. 1993. Effects of an operational application of Dimilin on non-target insects. Can Entomol. 125(2):173–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample BE, Butler L, Zivkovich C, Whitmore RC, Reardon R. 1996. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis berliner var kurstaki and defoliation by the gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)] on native arthropods in west Virginia. Can Entomol. 128(4):573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schintlmeister A. 2004. The taxonomy of the genus Lymantria Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Quadrifina. 7:1–248.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simó M, Laborda Á, Castro M. 2011. Las arañas en agroecosistemas: bioindicadores terrestres de calidad ambiental. INNOTEC. 6:51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 163(4148):688–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HR. 1985. Wildlife and the gypsy moth. Wildl Soc Bull. 13:166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria S, Abós F, Martín E. 1988. Influencia de los tratamientos con Diflubenzurón OCD 45 por 100 sobre pinares en las poblaciones de Graellsia isabelae (Graells) (Lep. Sphingidae) y reseña de su biología. In: Robredo F, editor. Estudios sobre los tratamientos forestales con diflubenzurón y su incidencia sobre la fauna. Madrid: ICONA. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación; p. 93–117.
   Google Scholar
• Zeppelini D, Bellini BC, Creao-Duarte AJ, Hernández M. 2009. Collembola as bioindicators of restoration in mined sand dunes of Northeastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv. 18(5):1161–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar