References
- Boghossian, P. (2005) ‘Is Meaning Normative?’, in C. Nimtz & A. Beckermann (eds) Philosophy–Science–Scientific Philosophy, Paderborn: Mentis.
- Broome, J. (2014) ‘Normativity in Reasoning’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95: 622–33.
- Bykvist, K., and A. Hattiangadi (2013) ‘Belief, Truth, and Blindspots’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dorsey, D. (2012) ‘Objective Morality, Subjective Morality, and the Explanatory Question’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6(3): 1–24.
- Driver, J. (2012a) Consequentialism, Abingdon: Routledge.
- Driver, J.. (2012b) ‘What the Objective Standard is Good For’, in M. Timmons (ed.) Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, volume 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Engel, P. (2013) ‘In Defence of Normativism about the Aim of Belief’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Evans, M., and N. Shah (2012) ‘Mental Agency and Metaethics’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 7, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gibbard, A. (2012) Meaning and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gibbons, J. (2013) The Norm of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Glüer, K., and Å. Wikforss (2009) ‘Against Content Normativity’, Mind 118: 31–70.
- Glüer, K., and Å. Wikforss. (2010) ‘The Truth-Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Steglich-Petersen’, Mind 119: 757–61.
- Glüer, K.., and Å. Wikforss (2013) ‘Against Belief Normativity’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Papineau, D. (2013) ‘There are No Norms of Belief’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Parfit, D. (2011) On What Matters, volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pettit, P. (1993) The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Railton, P. (2003 [1984]) ‘Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality’, reprinted in Facts, Values, and Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ridge, M. (2014) Impassioned Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ross, J. (2009) ‘How to be a Cognitivist about Practical Reason’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schroeder, M. (2007) Slaves of the Passions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schroeder, M.. (2009) ‘Hybrid Expressivism: Virtues and Vices’, Ethics 119: 257–309.
- Schroeder, M.. (2013) ‘Tempered Expressivism’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 8, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shah, N., and J. D. Velleman (2005) ‘Doxastic Deliberation’, Philosophical Review 114: 497–534.
- Smith, M. (2001) ‘Some Not-Much-Discussed Problems for Non-Cognitivism in Ethics’, Ratio 14: 93–115.
- Steglich-Petersen, A. (2010) ‘The Truth Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Glüer and Wikforss’, Mind 119: 749–55.
- Steglich-Petersen, A.. (2013) ‘The No Guidance Argument’, Theoria 79: 279–83.
- Toppinen, T. (2013) ‘Believing in Expressivism’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 8, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Toppinen, T.. (2015) ‘Expressivism and the Normativity of Attitudes’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96(2): 233–55.
- Wedgwood, R. (2002) ‘The Aim of Belief’, Philosophical Perspectives 16: 267–97.
- Whiting, D. (2010) ‘Should I Believe the Truth?’, Dialectica 61: 213–24.
- Whiting, D.. (2014) ‘Keep Things in Perspective: Reasons, Rationality and the A Priori’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 8(1): 1–22.
- Zangwill, N. (2010) ‘Normativity and the Metaphysics of Mind’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88: 21–39.