301
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How Norms (Might) Guide Belief

References

  • Boghossian, P. (2005) ‘Is Meaning Normative?’, in C. Nimtz & A. Beckermann (eds) Philosophy–Science–Scientific Philosophy, Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Broome, J. (2014) ‘Normativity in Reasoning’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95: 622–33.
  • Bykvist, K., and A. Hattiangadi (2013) ‘Belief, Truth, and Blindspots’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dorsey, D. (2012) ‘Objective Morality, Subjective Morality, and the Explanatory Question’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6(3): 1–24.
  • Driver, J. (2012a) Consequentialism, Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Driver, J.. (2012b) ‘What the Objective Standard is Good For’, in M. Timmons (ed.) Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, volume 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Engel, P. (2013) ‘In Defence of Normativism about the Aim of Belief’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Evans, M., and N. Shah (2012) ‘Mental Agency and Metaethics’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 7, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gibbard, A. (2012) Meaning and Normativity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gibbons, J. (2013) The Norm of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Glüer, K., and Å. Wikforss (2009) ‘Against Content Normativity’, Mind 118: 31–70.
  • Glüer, K., and Å. Wikforss. (2010) ‘The Truth-Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Steglich-Petersen’, Mind 119: 757–61.
  • Glüer, K.., and Å. Wikforss (2013) ‘Against Belief Normativity’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Papineau, D. (2013) ‘There are No Norms of Belief’, in T. Chan (ed.) The Aim of Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Parfit, D. (2011) On What Matters, volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pettit, P. (1993) The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Railton, P. (2003 [1984]) ‘Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality’, reprinted in Facts, Values, and Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ridge, M. (2014) Impassioned Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ross, J. (2009) ‘How to be a Cognitivist about Practical Reason’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schroeder, M. (2007) Slaves of the Passions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schroeder, M.. (2009) ‘Hybrid Expressivism: Virtues and Vices’, Ethics 119: 257–309.
  • Schroeder, M.. (2013) ‘Tempered Expressivism’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 8, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Shah, N., and J. D. Velleman (2005) ‘Doxastic Deliberation’, Philosophical Review 114: 497–534.
  • Smith, M. (2001) ‘Some Not-Much-Discussed Problems for Non-Cognitivism in Ethics’, Ratio 14: 93–115.
  • Steglich-Petersen, A. (2010) ‘The Truth Norm and Guidance: A Reply to Glüer and Wikforss’, Mind 119: 749–55.
  • Steglich-Petersen, A.. (2013) ‘The No Guidance Argument’, Theoria 79: 279–83.
  • Toppinen, T. (2013) ‘Believing in Expressivism’, in R. Shafer-Landau (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 8, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Toppinen, T.. (2015) ‘Expressivism and the Normativity of Attitudes’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96(2): 233–55.
  • Wedgwood, R. (2002) ‘The Aim of Belief’, Philosophical Perspectives 16: 267–97.
  • Whiting, D. (2010) ‘Should I Believe the Truth?’, Dialectica 61: 213–24.
  • Whiting, D.. (2014) ‘Keep Things in Perspective: Reasons, Rationality and the A Priori’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 8(1): 1–22.
  • Zangwill, N. (2010) ‘Normativity and the Metaphysics of Mind’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88: 21–39.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.