The end of what? Phenomenology vs. speculative realism

References

• Allais, L. (2004) ‘Kant’s One World: Interpreting “Transcendental Idealism”’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12(4): 655–684.10.1080/0960878042000279314
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. (2009) Logics of Worlds: Being and Event 2, London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, M. (1928) ‘Die neue Problemlage der Erkenntnistheorie’, Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 6: 611–639.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2012) Alien Phenomenology, or What it’s Like to be a Thing, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brassier, R. (2001). Alien Theory: The Decline of Materialism in the Name of Matter. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Brassier, R. (2007) Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590823
   Google Scholar
• Brassier, R., I. H. Grant, G. Harman, and Q. Meillassoux (2007) Speculative Realism. Collapse III: 306–449.
   Google Scholar
• Brassier, R., and Rychter, M. (2011). “I Am a Nihilist Because I Still Believe in Truth”. Kronos. Retrieved October 5, 2015 from http://www.kronos.org.pl/index.php?23151,896
   Google Scholar
• Braver, L. (2007) A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-realism, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braver, L. (2012) ‘A Brief History of Continental Realism’, Continental Philosophy Review 45(2): 261–289.10.1007/s11007-012-9220-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, T. (2003) Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498060
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, A. (2011) ‘Scientific Realism’. In E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1990) ‘The Structure and Content of Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 87(6): 279–328.10.2307/2026863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (2001) Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., and C. Spinosa (1999) ‘Coping with Things-in-Themselves: A Practice-Based Phenomenological Argument for Realism’, Inquiry 42(1): 49–78.10.1080/002017499321624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, S. (2002) ‘A Phenomenological Solution to the Measurement Problem? Husserl and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33(3): 467–491.10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazebrook, T. (2001) ‘Heidegger and Scientific Realism’, Continental Philosophy Review 34(4): 361–401.10.1023/A:1013148922905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, L. (2014) Nature’s Suit: Husserl’s Phenomenological Philosophy of the Physical Sciences, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2005) Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things, Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2008) ‘On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl’, Collapse IV. 333–364.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2011) The Quadruple Object, Alresford: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawking, S., and Mlodinow, L. (2010) The Grand Design, New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1982) The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1970) The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-7445-6
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1994) Briefwechsel – Wissenschaftlerkorrespondenz Husserliana Dokumente III/7 K.Schuhmann (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4899-3805-3
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (2001) Logical Investigations II, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1972) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meillassoux, Q. (2008) After Finitude. An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency, London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2012) ‘Art in the age of asymmetry: Hegel, objects, aesthetics’, Evental Aesthetics 1(1): 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, S. (2003) ‘On Levinas’ Critique of Husserl’, In D. Zahavi, S. Heinämaa, H. Ruin (eds) Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation, 115–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-007-1011-5
   Google Scholar
• Petitot, J. et al. (eds.) (1999) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1978) Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1987) The Many Faces of Realism, LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1988) Representation and Reality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1990) Realism with a Human Face, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1992) Renewing Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1999) The Threefold Cord. Mind, Body, and World, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockmore, T. (2011) Kant and Phenomenology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. (1959) My Philosophical Development. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ryckman, T. (2005) The Reign of Relativity: Philosophy in Physics, 1915–1925, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195177177.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, H. (2008) Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science, Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sebold, R. (2014) Continental Anti-Realism: A Critique, London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2011) ‘Panpsychism and/or Eliminativism’. Retrieved October 5, 2015 from http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=1012
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. (1997) ‘Realistic Phenomenology’, In L. Embree (ed.) Encyclopedia of Phenomenology, 586–590). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-5344-9
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, T. (2014) The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and the New Realism, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J. (1996). ‘Neurophenomenology a Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4): 330–349.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltsche, H. (under review) ‘Science, Realism and Correlationism. A Phenomenological Critique of Meillassoux’ Argument from Ancestrality’.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, P. (2014) Object-Oriented Philosophy: The Noumenon’s New Clothes, Falmouth: Urbanomic.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (1996) Husserl und die transzendentale Intersubjektivität. Eine Antwort auf die sprachpragmatische Kritik. Phaenomenologica 135, Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1585-5
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2003) Husserl’s Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2004a) ‘Phenomenology and the project of naturalization’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3(4): 331–347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2004b) ‘Natural Realism, Anti-Reductionism, and Intentionality. The ‘Phenomenology’ of Hilary Putnam’, in D. Carr and C. F. Cheung (eds) Time, Space, and Culture, 235–251. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2007) Phänomenologie für Einsteiger, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2008) ‘Phenomenology’, in D. Moran (ed) Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy, 661–692. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2010a) ‘Naturalized Phenomenology’, in S. Gallagher and D. Schmicking (eds) Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 2–19. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2010b) ‘Husserl and the ‘absolute’’, in C. Ierna, H. Jacobs, and F. Mattens (eds) Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences: Essays in Commemoration of Husserl, Dordrecht: Springer. (71–92). Phaenomenologica Vol. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2012a) ‘Noesis and noema’, The Times Literary Supplement, June 29, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (ed.) (2012b) The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2013) ‘Naturalized Phenomenology: A Desideratum or a Category Mistake?’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72: 23–42.10.1017/S1358246113000039
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2015) ‘Phenomenology of reflection’, in A. Staiti (ed) Commentary on Husserl’s Ideas I, 177–193. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D., and G. Satne (2016) ‘Varieties of shared intentionality: Tomasello and classical phenomenology’, in J. Bell, A. Cutrofello, and P. Livingston (eds) Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century, 305–325. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar