Naturalism, Experience, and Hume’s ‘Science of Human Nature’

References

• Allison, H. E. (2008) Custom and Reason in Hume: A Kantian Reading of the First Book of the Treatise, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532889.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J. (1980) Hume, New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1991) A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections of Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M., and M. McGinn (1990) ‘Naturalism and Scepticism’, Philosophy 65(254): 413–414.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (1971) Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connon, R.W. (1979) ‘The Naturalism of Hume Revisited’ in D. F. Norton, N. Capaldi, and W. L. Robison (eds.) McGill Hume Studies, San Diego, CA: Austin Hill Press, 121–145.
   Google Scholar
• De Caro, M., and D. McArthur (eds.) (2010) Naturalism and Normativity, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1991) Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature (Trans. C. Boundas), New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (2001). ‘Introduction I’, in S. Todes (ed.) Body and World, xv–xxvii.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (2005) ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit From the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79: 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (2007a) ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental’, Inquiry 50(4): 352–365.10.1080/00201740701489245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (2007b) ‘Response to McDowell’, Inquiry 50(4): 371–377.10.1080/00201740701489401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. (2013) ‘The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental’, in J. K. Schear (ed.), Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelin, R. (1985) Hume’s Scepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelin, R. (2009) Hume’s Skeptical Crisis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387391.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1970) History of England, in D. Forbes (ed.) Middlesex: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1975) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1969) Formal and Transcendental Logic (trans. D. Cairns), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-017-4900-8
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1999) Cartesian Meditations: an Introduction to Phenomenology, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason (trans. P. Guyer and A. Wood), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, N. (1905a) ‘The Naturalism of Hume (I)’, Mind 14: 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, N. (1905b) ‘The Naturalism of Hume (II)’, Mind 14: 335–347.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, N. (1941) The Philosophy of David Hume, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblith, H. (2002) Knowledge and its Place in Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199246319.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1986) Philosophical Papers vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, L. (2002) Stability and Justification in Hume’s Treatise, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195146581.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Maddy, P. (2007) Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (1996) Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (1998). ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’ in J. McDowell (ed.) Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 167–197.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002) Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mounce, H. O. (1999) Hume’s Naturalism, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papineau, D. (1993) Philosophical Naturalism, Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H. (2011) Naturalism Without Mirrors, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. (1969) ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (2005) ‘Mind, Body, and World: Todes and McDowell on Bodies and Language’, Inquiry 48(1): 38–61.10.1080/00201740510015329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, C. V. (1929). The Central Problem of David Hume’s Philosophy. An Essay Towards a Phenomenological Interpretation of the First Book of the Treatise of Human Nature, Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schear, J. K. (ed.) (2013) Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1997) Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (1985) Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties, London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, B. (1977) Hume, London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203169056
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, B. (2006) ‘The constraints of Hume’s naturalism’, Synthese 152: 339–351.10.1007/s11229-006-9009-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todes, S. (2001) Body and World, London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traiger, S. (1994). ‘Beyond Our Senses: Recasting Book I, Part 3 of Hume’s Treatise, Hume Studies 20(2): 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (2004) ‘The Unity of Hume’s Philosophical Project’, Hume Studies 30(2): 265–296.
   Google Scholar