Verbs, Times and Objects

References

• Bach, E. 1986. “The Algebra of Events.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, T. M., and D. P. Smith. 2005. “Wholly Present’ Defined.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2): 318–344. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00451.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, T. 2009. “Watching, Sight and the Temporal Shape of Perceptual Activity.” Philosophical Review 118 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1215/00318108-2008-027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther, T. 2018. “Processes as Continuants and Process as Stuff.” In Process, Action and Experience, edited by R. Stout, 58–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, T., and M. Soteriou. 2017. “Time in the Dream.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by I. Phillips, 184–200. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dainton, B. 2014. “The Phenomenal Continuum.” In Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, edited by V. Arstila and D. Lloyd, 101–137. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M. 2011. “Endurantist and Perdurantist Accounts of Persistence.” Philosophical Studies 154 (1): 27–51. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9526-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, K. [2006] 2008. “In Defence of Three-Dimensionalism.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62 (62): 1–16. First published in The Journal of Philosophy 103 (12): 699–714. doi:10.1017/S1358246108000544.
   Google Scholar
• Hofweber, T., and J. D. Velleman. 2011. “How to Endure.” The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242): 37–57. doi:10.1111/phiq.2011.61.issue-242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, J. 2012. “Actions and Activity.” Philosophical Issues 22: 233–245. doi:10.1111/phis.2012.22.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalderon, M. E. 2017. “I—Trinitarian Perception.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91: 21–41. doi:10.1093/arisup/akw015.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. 2014. “Extensionalism, Atomism and Continuity.” In Debates in the Metaphysics of Time, edited by L. N. Oaklander, 149–173. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Longworth, G. forthcoming. “The Ordinary and the Experimental: Cook Wilson and Austin on Method in Philosophy.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, N. 2002. “The Endurance/Perdurance Distinction.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3): 288–306. doi:10.1080/713659467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourelatos, A. 1978. “Events, Processes and States.” Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434. doi:10.1007/BF00149015.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shaughnessy, B. 2000. Consciousness and the World. Oxford: O.U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Pelczar, M. 2010. “Presentism, Eternalism and Phenomenal Change.” Synthese 176 (2): 275–290. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9493-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2010. “Perceiving Temporal Properties.” European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2): 176–202. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00299.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2014a. “The Temporal Structure of Experience.” In Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality, edited by V. Arstila and D. Lloyd, 139–158. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, I. 2014b. “Experience of and in Time.” Philosophy Compass 9 (2): 131–144. doi:10.1111/phc3.12107.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, S. 2016. Experiencing Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, S. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Aspect. London: Wiley/Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1954. Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures 1953. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, F. 1955. “Seeking, Scrutinizing and Seeing.” Mind 64: 455–478. doi:10.1093/mind/LXIV.256.455.
   Google Scholar
• Soteriou, M. 2010. “Perceiving Events.” Philosophical Explorations 13 (3): 223–241. doi:10.1080/13869795.2010.501904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soteriou, M. 2013. The Mind’s Construction. Oxford: O.U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Soteriou, M. 2018. “Experience, Process, Continuity and Boundary.” In Process, Action and Experience, edited by R. Stout, 82–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, H. 1997. The Ontology of Mind: States, Processes and Events. Oxford: O.U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, H. 2018. “Occurrent States.” In Process, Action and Experience, edited by R. Stout, 102–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R. 1997. “Processes.” Philosophy 72: 19–27. doi:10.1017/S0031819100056631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, R. 2016. “The Category of Occurrent Continuants.” Mind 125 (497): 41–62. doi:10.1093/mind/fzv138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 1985. Modes of Occurrence: Verbs, Adverbs and Events. Aristotelian Society Series, Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, J. D. 2006. “So It Goes.” The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 1 (2006): 1–23. http://www.amherstlecture.org/velleman2006/.
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Z. 1967a. “Verbs and Times.” In Linguistics in Philosophy, edited by Z. Vendler, 97–121. Ithaca, NY. Cornell University Press. This reprints in a revised form the essay originally published in Philosophical Review 66: 143–160. All page references are to the 1967 version.
   Google Scholar
• Vendler, Z. 1967b. “Linguistics and The a Priori.” In Linguistics in Philosophy, edited by Z. Vendler, 1–32. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verkuyl, H. J. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar