The Normative Underpinnings of Democracy and the Balance between Morality and Legitimacy

References

• Allen, A. 2016. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes, K. 2016. Habermas. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. 1998. “The Retrieval of the Democratic Ethos.” In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, edited by, M. Rosenfeld and A. Arato, 287–305. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwalter, A. 2002. “Habermas, Hegel and the Concept of Law.” In Discourse and Democracy: Essays on Habermas’s between Facts and Norms, edited by R. von Schomberg and K. Baynes, 129–152. SUNY series in Social and Political Though.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, J. 1999. “Does Hegel Critique of Kant‘S Moral Theory Apply to Discourse Ethics?” In Habermas: A Critical Reader, edited by P. Dews, 29–52. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, J. 2011. “Introduction: The Habermas Rawls Dispute - Analysis and Reevaluation.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 1–21. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, J. 2016. “Where the Right Gets In: On Rawls’s Critique of Habermas’s Conception of Legitimacy.” Kantian Review 2 (2): 161–183.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. 2003. “Habermas on Human Rights: Law, Morality, and Intercultural Dialogue.” Social Theory and Practice 29 (3): 431–457.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. 2011. “Two Models of Human Rights: Extending the Rawls–Habermas Debate.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 247–264. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. 2011. “The Justification of Justice: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 153–180. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill, J. 2011. “Procedure in Substance and Substance in Procedure: Reframing the Rawls-Habermas Debate.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 181–199. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998a. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by C. Cronin and P. De Greiff. Translated by C. Cronin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998b. “Reply to Critics.” In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, edited by M. Rosenfeld and A. Arato, 283–304. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory XXIX: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2003. Truth and Justification. Translated by B. Fultner. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Translated by C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2011a. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on Rawls‘S Political Liberalism.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 25–45. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2011b. “‘Reasonable versus True’, or the Morality of Worldviews.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 92–113. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, E. 2007. “Habermas and the Kant-Hegel Contrast.” In German Idealism, Contemporary Perspectives, edited by E. Hammer, 113–134. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick, T. 2010. Rawls and Habermas. Reason, Pluralism, and the Claims of Political Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, W. F. H. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2014. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. Translated by J. Ganahl. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1957. Perpetual Peace. Translated by L. W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1996. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laden, A. S. 2011. “The Justice of Justification.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 135–152. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. 1995. “The Foundations of Modern Democracy: Reflections on Jürgen Habermas.” European Journal of Philosophy 3: 55–68. doi:10.1111/ejop.1995.3.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, D. 2018. “Habermas’s Discourse Ethics and Hegel’s Critique of Kant: Agent Neutrality, Ideal Role Taking, and Rational Discourse.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 44: 997–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maus, I. 1992. Zur Aufklärung Der Demokratietheorie. Rechts- Und Demokratietheoretische Überlegungen Im Anschluß an Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Michelmann, F. 1998. “Family Quarrel.” In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, edited by M. Rosenfeld and A. Arato, 309–322. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2002. “Rawls in Germany.” European Journal of Political Theory 1 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1177/1474885102001002004.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 1986. The View From Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkard, T. 1994. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkard, T. 1999. “Virtues, Morality, and Sittlichkeit: From Maxims to Practices.” European Journal of Philosophy 7: 217–239. doi:10.1111/ejop.1999.7.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pippin, R. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pippin, R. 1991. Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2011. “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas.” In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political, edited by J. G. Finlayson and F. Freyenhagen, 46–91. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar