References
- Alexander, J., and J. M. Weinberg. 2014. “The ‘Unreliability’of Epistemic Intuitions.” In Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, edited by E. Machery and E. O’Neill, 128–145. New York: Routledge.
- Brogaard, B. 2016. “Linda the Bank Teller Case Revisited: Our Useful Reliance on Contextual and Non-Literal Information.” Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201611/linda-the-bank-teller-case-revisited
- Levy, A., and P. Godfrey-Smith, eds. Forthcoming. Philosophical Imagination: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Norton, J. D. 2013. “Chasing the Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment.” In Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science and the Arts, edited by J. R. Brown, M. Frappier, and L. Meynell, 123–140. New York: Routledge.
- Nussbaum, M. C. 1990. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford University Press.
- Salis, F. 2018. “Scientific Discovery through Fictionally Modelling Reality.” Topoi. doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9582-0.
- Stanley, J. 2015. How Propaganda Works. Princeton University Press.
- Stuart, M. T. 2017. “How Thought Experiments Increase Understanding.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments, edited by M. T. Stuart, Y. J. H. Fehige, and J. R. Brown, 526–544. London: Routledge.
- Valdesolo, P., and D. DeSteno. 2006. “Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgement.” Psychological Science 17 (6): 476–477. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01731.x.
- Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.