165
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Two Versions of the Conceptual Content of Experience

References

  • Bayne, T. 2009. “Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.” Philosophical Quarterly 236: 385–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.631.x.
  • Brewer, B. 2006. “Perception and Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 14: 165–181. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00220.x.
  • Brewer, B. 2011. Perception and Its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chalmers, D. 2006. “Perception and the Fall from Eden.” In Perceptual Experience, edited by T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 49–125. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Chisholm, R. 1957. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Crane, T. 2013. “The Given.” In Mind, Reason, and Being-in-The-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, edited by J. Schear, 229–249. London: Routledge.
  • Davidson, D. 1999. “Reply to John Mcdowell.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by Lewis E. Hahn, 105–107. Chicago: Open Court.
  • Davidson, D. 2001a. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” Chap. 10. in Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Evans, G. 1982. Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fish, W. 2009. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ginsborg, H. 2006. “Reasons for Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2): 286–318. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00562.x.
  • Ginsborg, H. 2011. “Perception, Generality and Reasons.” In Reasons for Belief, edited by A. Reisner and A. Steglish-Peterse, 131–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huemer, M. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Kalpokas, D. 2015. “Perceptual Experience and Seeing-As.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1): 123–144. doi:10.15845/nwr.v4i1.3296.
  • Kalpokas, D. 2017. “Experience and Justification: Revisiting McDowell’s Empiricism.” Erkenntnis 82 (4): 715–738. doi:10.1007/s10670-016-9840-8.
  • Lyons, J. 2008. “Evidence, Experience, and Externalism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3): 461–479. doi:10.1080/00048400801886363.
  • Macpherson, F. 2012. “Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (1): 24–62. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00481.x.
  • McDowell, J. 1996. Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, J. 1998. “Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.” Chap. 11 in Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, J. 2002. “Responses.” In Reading McDowell on Mind and World, edited by N. Smith, 269–305. New York: Routledge.
  • McDowell, J. 2009a. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given.” Chap. 14. in Having the World in View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, J. 2009b. “Conceptual Capacities in Perception.” Chap. 7. in Having the World in View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • McDowell, J. 2013a. “Perceptual Experience: Both Relational and Contentful.” European Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 144–157. doi:10.1111/ejop.12005.
  • McDowell, J. 2013b. “Tyler Burge on Disjunctivism II.” Philosophical Explorations 16 (3): 259–279. doi:10.1080/13869795.2013.808693.
  • Montague, M. 2016. The Given: Experience and Its Content. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is It to Be a Bat?” Philosophical Review 83: 435–450. doi:10.2307/2183914.
  • Noë, A. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • O’Callaghan, C. 2011. “Against Hearing Meanings.” Philosophical Quarterly 61: 783–807. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.704.x.
  • Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. 1999. “Is Vision Continuous with Cognition? the Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Experience.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3): 341–365. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99002022.
  • Reiland, I. 2015. “On Experiencing Meanings.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 53: 481–492. doi:10.1111/sjp.12150.
  • Rosenberg, J. 2002. Thinking and Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Schellenberg, S. 2011. “Perceptual Content Defended.” Nous 45 (4): 714–750. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00791.x.
  • Schellenberg, S. 2018. The Unity of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shoemaker, S. 1994a. “Self-Knowledge and ‘Inner Sense’: Lecture III: The Phenomenal Character of Experience.” Philosophy and the Phenomenological Research 54 (2): 291–314. doi:10.2307/2108490.
  • Shoemaker, S. 1994b. “Phenomenal Character.” Nous 28 (1): 21–38. doi:10.2307/2215918.
  • Siegel, S. 2006. “Which Properties are Represented in Perception?” In Perceptual Experience, edited by T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 481–503. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Siegel, S. 2010. The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Siegel, S. 2011. “Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification.” Nous 42 (2): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00786.x.
  • Stokes, D. 2013. “Cognitive Penetrability of Perception.” Philosophy Compass 8 (7): 646–663. doi:10.1111/phc3.12043.
  • Strawson, P. 1974. “Imagination and Perception.” Chap. 3. in Freedom and Resentment. London: Methuen.
  • Thau, M. 2002. Consciousness and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Travis, C. 2004. “The Silence of the Senses.” Mind 113: 57–94. doi:10.1093/mind/113.449.57.
  • Vance, J. 2014. “Emotion and the New Epistemic Challenge from Cognitive Penetrability.” Philosophical Studies 169: 257–283. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0181-z.
  • Wittgenstein, L. [1953] 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Revised fourth edition by P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.