What We Talk about When We Talk about Truth: Dewey, Wittgenstein, and the Pragmatic Test

References

• Anderson, E. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme 3 (1–2): 8–22. doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, P. 2016. Epistemic Contextualism: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boncompagni, A. 2017. “Wittgenstein and Pragmatism: A Neglected Remark in Manuscript 107 (1930).” In Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology before the Great Divide, edited by S. Marchetti and M. Baghramian, 168–184. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwsma, O. K. 1986. Wittgenstein Conversations, 1949–1951. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. 2017. Experiencing William James: Belief in a Pluralistic World. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, J. 2017. “A Pragmatic Argument for a Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” Contemporary Pragmatism 14 (2): 135–156. doi:10.1163/18758185-01402001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, J. 2018. “Did Dewey Have a Theory of Truth?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54 (1): 39–63. doi:10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.54.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, J. 2020. “A Common-Sense Pragmatic Theory of Truth.” Philosophia 48 (2): 463–481. doi: 10.1007/s11406-019-00099-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, J. 2020a. “Democracy, Truth, and Understanding: An Epistemic Argument for Democracy.” In Democracy, Populism, and Truth, edited by M. C. Navin and R. Nunan, 63–76. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Capps, J. Forthcoming. “The Less Said the Better: Dewey, Neurath, and Mid-century Theories of Truth.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, H. 2001. The Truth Is What Works: William James, Pragmatism, and the Seed of Death. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938] 1991. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. In John Dewey: The Later Works (Volume 12), edited by J. Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1941. “Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 38 (7): 169–186. doi:10.2307/2017978.
   Google Scholar
• Dolby, D. 2017. “Wittgenstein on Truth.” In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by J. Glock and J. Hyman, 433–442. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, H.-J. 2004. “Wittgenstein on Truth.” In Knowledge and Belief, edited by W. Löffler and P. Weingartner, 328–346. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. 2016. “Wittgenstein on Truth.” Argumenta 2: 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1975. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Morvan, P. 2004. “Ramsey on Truth and Truth on Ramsey.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4): 705–718. doi:10.1080/0960878042000279332.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2004. Truth and the End of Inquiry. expanded ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2007. “Pragmatism and Deflationism.” In New Pragmatists, edited by C. Misak, 68–90. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2008. “A Culture of Justification: The Pragmatist’s Epistemic Argument for Democracy.” Episteme 5 (1): 94–105. doi:10.3366/E1742360008000257.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2009. “Truth and Democracy: Pragmatism and the Deliberative Virtues.” In Does Truth Matter? edited by R. Geenens and R. Tinnevelt, 29–39. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C. 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misak, C., and R. Talisse. 2014. “Pragmatist Epistemology and Democratic Theory: A Reply to Eric MacGilvray.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (3): 366–376. doi:10.1111/jopp.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyal-Sharrock, D., and W. H. Brenner, eds. 2007. Readings on Wittgenstein’s on Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and J. Weatherall. 2019. The Misinformation Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., and E. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1935. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 5., edited by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1986. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” In C. Kloesel, M. Fisch, L. Ziegler, D. Roberts & N. Houser (Eds.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition. Vols. 3: 1872–1878, edited by C. Kloesel, M. Fisch, et al., 257–276. Bloomington, In Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H. 2003. “Truth as Convenient Friction.” Journal of Philosophy 100 (4): 167–190. doi:10.5840/jphil200310048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. 2016. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. A. 2010. “Dewey’s Epistemology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Dewey, edited by M. Cochran, 34–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1970. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. 1991. On Truth. Edited by N. Rescher and U. Majer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, G. 2003. “Disunity in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.” In Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by G. Hardcastle and A. Richardson, 197–215. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1939. “Dewey’s New Logic.” In The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp and L. E. Hahn, 137–156. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1940. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1946. A History of Western Philosophy. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1994a. “Pragmatism.” In Philosophical Essays, 79–111. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1994b. “William James’ Conception of Truth.” In Philosophical Essays, 112–130. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. 2007. “On Our Interest in Getting Things Right: Pragmatism without Narcissism.” In New Pragmatists, edited by C. Misak, 7–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroll, A. 1994. Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., and C. Johnston. 2018. “Judgments, Facts, and Propositions: Theories of Truth in Russell, Wittgenstein, and Ramsey.” In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by M. Glanzberg, 150–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarski, A. 1944. “The Semantic Conception of Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3): 341–375. doi:10.2307/2102968.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherall, J., and C. O’Connor. 2020. “Conformity in Scientific Networks.” Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02520-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2007. “Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism Is Not Relativism.” Episteme 4 (1): 93–114. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.1.93.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Zollman, K. J. 2007. “The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5): 574–587. doi:10.1086/525605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollman, K. J. 2010. “The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.” Erkenntnis 72 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1007/s10670-009-9194-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar