References
- Adams, F., J. A. Barker, and J. Figurelli. 2012. “Towards Closure on Closure.” Synthese 188 (2): 179–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9922-8.
- Adams, F., and M. Clarke. 2005. “Resurrecting the Tracking Theories.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2): 207–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400500111030.
- Alfano, M. 2009. “Sensitivity Theory and the Individuation of Belief-Formation Methods.” Erkenntnis 70 (2): 271–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9127-9.
- Alspector-Kelly, M. 2011. “Why Safety Doesn’t Save Closure.” Synthese 183 (2): 127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9755-x.
- Ball, B. 2016. “Knowledge, Safety, and Questions.” Filosofia Unisinos 17 (1): 58–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.171.07.
- Becker, K. 2006. “Is Counterfactual Reliabilism Compatible with Higher‐Level Knowledge?” Dialectica 60 (1): 79–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2005.01046.x.
- Becker, K. 2007. Epistemology Modalized. London: Routledge.
- Becker, K. 2008. “Epistemic Luck and the Generality Problem.” Philosophical Studies 139 (3): 353–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9122-z.
- Becker, K. 2009. “Margins for Error and Sensitivity: What Nozick Might Have Said.” Acta Analytica 24 (1): 17–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-008-0042-0.
- Becker, K. 2012a. “Basic Knowledge and Easy Understanding.” Acta Analytica 27 (2): 145–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-011-0139-8.
- Becker, K. 2013. “Why Reliabilism Does Not Permit Easy Knowledge.” Synthese 190 (17): 3751–3775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0222-8.
- Becker, K. 2012b. “Methods and How to Individuate Them.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 81–97. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Becker, K. 2016. “BIVs, Sensitivity, Discrimination, and Relevant Alternatives.” In The Brain in a Vat, edited by S. C. Goldberg, 111–127. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Becker, K. 2018. “The Sensitivity Response to the Gettier Problem.” In The Gettier Problem, edited by S. Hetherington, 108–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Beddor, B., and C. Pavese. 2020. “Modal Virtue Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1): 61–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12562.
- Bernecker, S. 2012. “Sensitivity, Safety, and Closure.” Acta Analytica 27 (4): 367–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-011-0137-x.
- Bernecker, S. 2020. “Against Global Method Safety.” Synthese 197 (12): 5101–5116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02008-5.
- Bjerring, J. C., and L. B. Gundersen. 2020. “Higher-Order Knowledge and Sensitivity.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3): 339–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2019.36.
- Black, T., and P. Murphy. 2007. “In Defense of Sensitivity.” Synthese 154 (1): 53–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-8487-9.
- Black, T. 2002. “A Moorean Response to Brain-in-A-Vat Scepticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2): 148–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/724051028.
- Black, T. 2019. “Anti-Luck Epistemology.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck, edited by I. M. Church and R. J. Hartman, 284–294. New York: Routledge.
- Black, T. 2011. “Modal and Anti-Luck Epistemology.” In The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, edited by S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard, 187–198. New York: Routledge.
- Black, T. 2008. “Defending a Sensitive Neo-Moorean Invariantism.” In New Waves in Epistemology, edited by V. F. Hendricks and D. Pritchard, 8–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Blome-Tillmann, M. 2020. “Non-Reductive Safety.” Belgrade Philosophical Annual 33: 25–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/BPA2033025B.
- Blome-Tillmann, M. 2017. “Sensitivity Actually.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3): 606–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12253.
- Bogardus, T., and C. Marxen. 2014. “Yes, Safety is in Danger.” Philosophia 42 (2): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9508-4.
- Bolos, A., and J. H. Collin. 2018. “A Sensitive Virtue Epistemology.” Synthese 195 (3): 1321–1335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1273-z.
- Broncano-Berrocal, F. 2019. “Knowledge, Safety, and Gettiered Lottery Cases: Why Mere Statistical Evidence is Not a (Safe) Source of Knowledge.” Philosophical Issues 29(1): 37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12139.
- Broncano-Berrocal, F. 2014. “Is Safety in Danger?” Philosophia 42 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9467-9.
- Broncano-Berrocal, F. 2018. “Knowledge and Tracking Revisited.” Analysis 78 (3): 396–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx131.
- Carter, J. A. 2010. “Anti-Luck Epistemology and Safety’s Discontents.” Philosophia 38 (3): 517–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9219-z.
- Collin, J. H., and A. Bolos. 2020. “Sensitivity Theorists Aren’t Unhinged.” Erkenntnis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00206-2.
- Collin, J. H. 2018. “Towards an Account of Epistemic Luck for Necessary Truths.” Acta Analytica 33 (4): 483–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-018-0360-9.
- Cross, T. 2010. “Skeptical Success.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology. 3 vols., edited by T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, 35–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- David, M., and T. A. Warfield. 2008. “Knowledge-Closure and Skepticism.” In Epistemology: New Essays, edited by Q. Smith, 137–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- DeRose, K. 1995. “Solving the Skeptical Problem.” Philosophical Review 104 (1): 1–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2186011.
- DeRose, K. 2010. “Insensitivity is Back, Baby!” Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1): 161–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00189.x.
- Dutant, J. 2010. “Two Notions of Safety.” Swiss Philosophical Preprints 87: 1–19.
- Dutant, J. 2016. “How to be an Infallibilist.” Philosophical Issues 26 (1): 148–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12085.
- Garrett, B. J. 1983. “Nozick on Knowledge.” Analysis 43 (3): 181–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/43.4.181.
- Goldberg, S. 2012. “Sensitivity from Others.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 43–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Goldman, A. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 73 (20): 771–791. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2025679.
- Goldman, A. 2009. “Williamson on Knowledge and Evidence.” In Williamson on Knowledge, edited by P. Greenough and D. Pritchard, 73–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Greco, J. 2012. “Better Safe than Sensitive.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 193–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Grundmann, T. 2020. “Saving Safety From Counterexamples.” Synthese 197 (12): 5161–5185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1677-z.
- Gundersen, L. B. 2003. Dispositional Theories of Knowledge. Burlington: Ashgate.
- Gundersen, L. B. 2010. “Tracking, Epistemic Dispositions and the Conditional Analysis.” Erkenntnis 72 (3): 353–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-009-9201-y.
- Gundersen, L. B. 2012. “Knowledge, Cognitive Dispositions and Conditionals.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 66–81. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hirvelä, J. 2017. “Is It Safe to Disagree?” Ratio 30 (3): 305–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12137.
- Hirvelä, J. 2019. “Global Safety: How to Deal with Necessary Truths.” Synthese 196 (3): 1167–1186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1511-z.
- Hirvelä, J. 2020. “No Safe Haven for the Virtuous.” Episteme 17 (1): 48–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.15.
- Huemer, M. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ichikawa, J. J. 2011. “Quantifiers, Knowledge, and Counterfactuals.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2): 287–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00427.x.
- Kelp, C. 2013. “Knowledge: The Safe-Apt View.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2): 265–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2012.673726.
- Kripke, S. 2011. “Nozick on Knowledge.” In Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers. 1 vols., 162–224. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kvanvig, J. L. 2008. “Critical Notice of Pritchard’s Epistemic Luck.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 272–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592-2008.00187.x.
- Kvanvig, J. L. 2006. “Closure Principles.” Philosophy Compass 1 (3): 256–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00027.x.
- Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2008. “Single Premise Deduction and Risk.” Philosophical Studies 141: 157–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9157-1.
- Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2010. “Unreasonable Knowledge.” Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1): 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00183.x.
- Lewis, D. 1973a. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lewis, D. 1973b. “Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4): 418–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262950.
- Luper-Foy, S. 1984. “The Epistemic Predicament: Knowledge, Nozickian Tracking, and Scepticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (1): 26–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408412341241.
- Luper, S. 2006a. “Dretske on Knowledge Closure.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3): 379–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400600895862.
- Luper, S. 2006b. “Restorative Rigging and the Safe Indication Account.” Synthese 153 (1): 161–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-6399-3.
- Luper, S. 2020. “Epistemic Closure.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/closure-epistemic
- Luper, S. 2012. “False Negatives.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 207–226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Luper, S. 2003. “Indiscernability Skepticism.” In The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays (Ashgate Epistemology and Mind Series), edited by S. Luper, 183–202. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
- Manley, D. 2007. “Safety, Content, Apriority, Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 104 (8): 403–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2007104813.
- Melchior, G. 2015. “The Heterogeneity Problem for Sensitivity Accounts.” Episteme 12 (4): 479–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.31.
- Melchior, G. 2017b. “Sensitivity has Multiple Heterogeneity Problems: A Reply to Wallbridge.” Philosophia 45 (4): 1741–1747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9873-5.
- Melchior, G. 2021. “Sensitivity, Safety, and Impossible Worlds.” Philosophical Studies 178 (3): 713–729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01453-8.
- Melchior, G. 2017a. “Epistemic Luck and Logical Necessities: Armchair Luck Revisited.” In Thought Experiments between Nature and Society: A Festschrift for Nenad Miščević, edited by B. Borstner and S. Gartner, 137–150. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Miščević, N. 2007. “Armchair Luck: Apriority, Intellection and Epistemic Luck.” Acta Analytica 22 (1): 48–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866210.
- Murphy, P. 2005. “Closure Failures for Safety.”Philosophia 33: 331–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652659.
- Murphy, P. 2006. “A Strategy for Assessing Closure.” Erkenntnis 65: 365–383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9009-y.
- Murphy, P., and T. Black. 2012. “Sensitivity Meets Explanation: An Improved Counterfactual Condition on Knowledge.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 28–42. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Neil, C. 2019. “Safety, Domination, and Differential Support.” Synthese 198 (2): 1139–1152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02091-2.
- Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Paterson, N. J. 2020. “Safety and Necessity.” Erkenntnis. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-00231-6.
- Peet, A., and E. Pitcovski. 2018. “Normal Knowledge: Toward an Explanation-Based Theory of Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 115 (3): 141–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201811539.
- Pritchard, D. 2002. “Resurrecting the Moorean Response to Scepticism.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (3): 283–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550210152122.
- Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pritchard, D. 2007. “Anti-Luck Epistemology.” Synthese 158 (3): 277–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7.
- Pritchard, D. 2008c. “Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Luck, Revisited.” Metaphilosophy 39 (1): 66–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00522.x.
- Pritchard, D. 2009. “Safety-Based Epistemology: Whither Now?” Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 33–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2009_2.
- Pritchard, D. 2012a. “Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.” Journal of Philosophy 109 (3): 247–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201210939.
- Pritchard, D. 2015. “Anti-Luck Epistemology and the Gettier Problem.” Philosophical Studies 172 (1): 93–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0374-0.
- Pritchard, D. 2016. Epistemology. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Pritchard, D. 2008b. “Sensitivity, Safety, and Anti-Luck Epistemology.” In Oxford Handbook of Skepticism, edited by J. Greco, 437–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pritchard, D. 2013. “Knowledge Cannot be Lucky.” In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. 2nd ed., edited by M. Steup, J. Turri, and E. Sosa, 152–164. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Pritchard, D. 2017. “Knowledge, Luck, and Virtue: Resolving the Gettier Problem.” In Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem, edited by R. Borges, C. de Almeida, and P. Klein, 57–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pritchard, D. 2018. “The Gettier Problem and Epistemic Luck.” In The Gettier Problem, edited by S. Hetherington, 96–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pritchard, D. 2012b. “In Defence of Modest Anti-Luck Epistemology.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by T. Black and K. Becker, 173–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pritchard, D. 2008a. “Knowledge, Luck, and Lotteries.” In New Waves in Epistemology, edited by V. F. Hendricks and D. Pritchard, 28–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ramachandran, M. 2015. “Knowing by Way of Tracking and Epistemic Closure.” Analysis 75 (2): 217–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anv018.
- Roland, J., and J. Cogburn. 2011. “Anti-Luck Epistemologies and Necessary Truths.” Philosophia 39 (3): 547–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9295-0.
- Roush, S. 2005. Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Roush, S. 2012. “Sensitivity and Closure.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 242–268. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Sainsbury, R. M. 1997. “Easy Possibilities.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4): 907–919. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2953809.
- Schulz, M. 2021. “Finding Closure for Safety.” Episteme 18: 711–725.
- Sosa, E. 1999a. “How Must Knowledge be Modally Related to What is Known?” Philosophical Topics 26 (1&2): 373–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics1999261/229.
- Sosa, E. 1999b. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 141–154.
- Sosa, E. 2004. “Relevant Alternatives, Contextualism Included.” Philosophical Studies 119 (1/2): 35–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000029349.75799.17.
- Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. I vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, E. 2009. Reflective Knowledge: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge. II vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, E. 2015. Judgment and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, E. 1996. “Postscript to ‘Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology.” In Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga’s Theory of Knowledge, edited by J. Kvanvig, 269–278. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Sosa, E. 2002. “Tracking, Competence, and Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, edited by P. K. Moser, 264–287. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, E. 2003. “Neither Contextualism Nor Skepticism.” In The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays (Ashgate Epistemology and Mind Series), edited by S. Luper, 165–182. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
- Stalnaker, R. C. 1968. “A Theory of Conditionals.” In Studies in Logical Theory, edited by N. Rescher, 98–112. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Topey, B. 2022. “Saving Sensitivity.” The Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1): 177–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqab015.
- Vogel, J. 2000. “Reliabilism Leveled.” Journal of Philosophy 97 (11): 602–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2678454.
- Vogel, J. 2007. “Subjunctivitis.” Philosophical Studies 134 (1): 73–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9013-8.
- Vogel, J. 2012. “The Enduring Trouble with Tracking.” In The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology, edited by K. Becker and T. Black, 122–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Vogel, J. 1987. “Tracking, Closure, and Inductive Knowledge.” In The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics, edited by S. Luper, 197–215. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Wallbridge, K. 2017. “Sensitivity hasn’t Got a Heterogeneity Problem: A Reply to Melchior.” Philosophia 45 (2): 835–841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-016-9782-z.
- Wallbridge, K. 2018a. “Sensitivity and Higher-Order Knowledge.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (2): 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12164.
- Wallbridge, K. 2018b. “Sensitivity, Induction, and Miracles.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (1): 118–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1328697.
- Warfield, T. A. 2004. “When Epistemic Closure Does and Does Not Fail: A Lesson from the History of Epistemology.” Analysis 64 (1): 35–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.1.35.
- Wedgwood, R. 2020. “The Internalist Virtue Theory of Knowledge.” Synthese 197 (12): 5357–5378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1707-x.
- Williams, M. 1991. Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Williamson, T. 2009. “Reply to John Hawthorne and Maria Lasonen-Aarnio.” In Williamson on Knowledge, edited by P. Greenough and D. Pritchard, 313–329. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Zalabardo, J. 2012. Scepticism and Reliable Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Zalabardo, J. 2017. “Safety, Sensitivity and Differential Support.” Synthese 197 (12): 5379–5388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1645-z.
- Zhao, B. 2021a. “A Dilemma for Globalized Safety.” Acta Analytica. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-021-00478-w.
- Zhao, B. 2021b. “Knowledge from Falsehood, Ignorance of Necessary Truths, and Safety.” Philosophia. doi:11.1007/s11406-021-00410-x.
- Zhao, B. forthcoming. “Epistemic Closure, Necessary Truths, and Safety.” American Philosophical Quarterly.
- Zhao, H., and P. Baumann. 2021. “Inductive Knowledge and Lotteries: Could One Explain Both ‘Safely’?” Ratio 34 (2): 118–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12296.