Blame as a sentiment

References

• Arneson, R. 2003. “The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility and Desert.” In Desert and Justice, edited by S. Olsaretti, 233–258. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ze’ev, A. 2000. The Subtlety of Emotions. Vol. 63. MIT Press.: Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• D’arms, J. 2003. “VIII. The Significance of Recalcitrant Emotion: Justin D’Arms and Daniel Jacobson.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 52: 127–145. doi:10.1017/S1358246100007931.
   Google Scholar
• D’Arms, J., and D. Jacobson. 2000. “The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions.” Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1): 65–90. doi:10.2307/2653403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deonna, J., and F. Teroni. 2009. “Taking Affective Explanations to Heart.” Social Science Information 48 (3): 359–377. doi:10.1177/0539018409106197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deonna, J., and F. Teroni. 2011. The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, A. C. 1948. The Definition of Good. Westport, CT: Hyperion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2016. “What’s the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation.” Noûs 50 (1): 165–183. doi:10.1111/nous.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. 2018. Between Values and the World: Studies in second-order Value Theory. Lund: Media-Tryck.
   Google Scholar
• Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, B. W. 2009. “Love, Identification, and the Emotions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1): 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, P. 2004. “The Force and Fairness of Blame.” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1): 115–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. edited by D. F. Norton and J. Mary. Oxford: Norton. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kubala, R. 2017. “Valuing and Believing Valuable.” Analysis 77 (1): 59–65. doi:10.1093/analys/anx043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menges, L. 2017. “The Emotion Account of Blame.” Philosophical Studies 174 (1): 257–273. doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0680-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milam, P. 2021. “Get Smart: Outcomes, Influence, and Responsibility.” The Monist 104 (4): 443–457. doi:10.1093/monist/onab011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, edited by S. Mumford. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, S. 1998. Dispositions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naar, H. 2013. “A Dispositional Theory of Love.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3): 342–357. doi:10.1111/papq.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naar, H. 2018. “Sentiments.” In The Ontology of Emotions, edited by H. Naar and F. Teroni, 149–168. Clays: St Ives plc: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2016. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, D. 2009. “Free Will, Love and Anger.” Ideas Y Valores 58 (141): 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, H. 2013. “Irrational Blame.” Analysis 73 (4): 613–626. doi:10.1093/analys/ant075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmore, D. W. 2022. “A Comprehensive Account of Blame: Self-Blame, Non-Moral Blame, and Blame for the Non-Voluntary.” In Self-Blame and Moral Responsibility, edited by A. B. Carlsson, 48–76, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of the Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, J. 2009. “The Moral Emotions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, edited by P. Goldie, 519–538. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. 2015. “The Alethic Conception of Moral Responsibility.” In The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays, edited by R. Clarke, M. McKenna, and A. M. Smith, 65–87. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. 2008. Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. 2010. Equality and Tradition: Questions of Value in Moral and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sher, G. 2005. In Praise of Blame. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skorupski, J. 2010. The Domain of Reasons. Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, R. C. 1976. The Passions. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Svedberg, M., and T. Tännsjö. 2017. “Consequentialism and Free Will.” The Harvard Review of Philosophy 24: 23–41. doi:10.5840/harvardreview2017558.
   Google Scholar
• Tappolet, C. 2016. Emotions, Value, and Agency. New York: Oxford University Press UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vendrell Ferran, Í. forthcoming. “Hate: Toward a Four-Types Model.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. 1994. Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. United States of America: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R. J. 2012. “Dispassionate Opprobrium.” In Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon, edited by R. J. Wallace, R. Kumar, and S. Freeman, 348–372. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. 2011. “Blame, Italian Style.” In Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon, edited by R. J. Wallace, R. Kumar, and S. Freeman, 332–347. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. 1988. An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar